NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Allison, Nancy – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Offers suggestions and examples of how to write clear and effective notes, cautions, and warnings. (SR)
Descriptors: Technical Writing, Writing Improvement, Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nadziejka, David E. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Discusses how too much caution can lead authors to simple verbosity or to the overgeneralization of simple concepts. (SR)
Descriptors: Technical Writing, Writing Difficulties, Writing Improvement, Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keller, Chuck – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Discusses a proposal's executive summary: its purpose, how long it should be, what should be in it, when it should be started, who should write it, and how it should be reviewed. (SR)
Descriptors: Proposal Writing, Technical Writing, Writing Improvement, Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beck, Charles E. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1995
Examines the paradigm "the writer is self-contained," which underlies current writing practices in business and education. Discusses how creating a supportive climate for the writing process relates to the paradigm "every writer needs an editor." Discusses the implications of making such a change in business, industry, and education. (SR)
Descriptors: Editors, Higher Education, Writing Attitudes, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Allison, Nancy – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1993
Discusses kinds of jargon found in technical writing, how much jargon is acceptable, and the best way to handle jargon. (SR)
Descriptors: Jargon, Language Usage, Technical Writing, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nadziejka, David E. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Offers examples of what can happen when writers try to be impressive, and instead are vapid, grandiloquent, opaque, or absurd. (SR)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Language Usage, Technical Writing, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Makes suggestions for editing technical proposals. Discusses the marketeers, the hierarchy of hype, how to save days, managing story boards, expediting a laborious process, teaching engineers to write, writing incrementally, the art group, and the editing task. Argues that the best proposals come from starting to write early. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Proposal Writing, Teamwork, Technical Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harmon, Joseph E.; Gross, Alan G. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1996
Argues that scientific style manuals provide much sound advice, but also pass along advice at odds with recently published literature regarding how scientists actually conduct research and write up their findings. Presents a revised model for the scientific article based on information in recently published research on communication in science.…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Models, Research Methodology, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Connelly, James O. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1993
Shares practical information that technical writers can use when writing scripts for video presentations. Discusses the kinds of information needed for script writing, the steps involved in doing so, and the script's role in production and editing. (SR)
Descriptors: Scripts, Technical Writing, Videotape Recordings, Writing Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kohl, John R. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1999
Argues that, given the expanding audience of non-native readers of English and the need to translate technical writing, technical writing should be unambiguous and predictable. Explains what syntactic cues are and why technical communicators should use them. Discusses integrating this approach into established documentation processes, and provides…
Descriptors: Cues, Documentation, Global Approach, Higher Education