Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Word Processing | 3 |
| Writing Improvement | 3 |
| Peer Evaluation | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| Writing Research | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Collaborative Writing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| English Departments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Barker, Thomas T. | 1 |
| Fernández Sánchez, María Jesús | 1 |
| Graham, Steve | 1 |
| Harris, Karen | 1 |
| Hebert, Michael | 1 |
| Martín Parejo, David | 1 |
| Mayo Beltrán, Alba Mª | 1 |
| Montanero Fernández, Manuel | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Spain | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textMayo Beltrán, Alba Mª; Fernández Sánchez, María Jesús; Montanero Fernández, Manuel; Martín Parejo, David – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
This study compares the effects of two resources, a paper rubric (CR) or the comment bubbles from a word processor (CCB), to support peer co-evaluation of expository texts in primary education. A total of 57 students wrote a text which, after a peer co-evaluation process, was rewritten. To analyze the improvements in the texts, we used a rubric…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Evaluation Methods, Word Processing, Computer Software
Graham, Steve; Harris, Karen; Hebert, Michael – Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2011
During this decade there have been numerous efforts to identify instructional practices that improve students' writing. These include "Reading Next" (Biancarosa and Snow, 2004), which provided a set of instructional recommendations for improving writing, and "Writing Next" (Graham and Perin, 2007) and "Writing to Read" (Graham and Hebert, 2010),…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Instruction
Barker, Thomas T. – 1985
The English Microlab Registry (EMR) was first designed as a database, or research tool, for planners of English microlabs in order to give them access to information about all aspects of microlab management. But EMR also provides descriptive data about what a microlab is and may well provide insight into whether those labs will survive. An…
Descriptors: English Departments, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Learning Laboratories
