NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 40 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Masoud Rahimi; Jalil Fathi; Di Zou – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Grounded in the activity theory, we adopted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' academic writing skills (i.e. task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexicon, and grammatical range and accuracy). To this end, two…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Language Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Giang Thi Linh Hoang; Neomy Storch – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2024
Research has suggested that the type of feedback learners receive can impact on whether learners understand the feedback, the extent to which they engage with it, and whether they incorporate it in their revised drafts. However, to date, only a small number of studies have investigated learner engagement with corrective feedback provided by…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Language Processing, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad; Fotoohnejad, Samira – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021
Considering the prominence attached to written corrective feedback (WCF) within the domain of second/foreign language (L2) acquisition, automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools have steadily gained ground over the last two decades. The current study was an attempt to investigate the extent incorporating an AWE program, known as Criterion®, within…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohsen, Mohammed Ali – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2022
Written corrective feedback for improving L2 writing skills has been a debatable issue for more than two decades. The aims of this meta-analysis are to (1) provide a quantitative measure of the effect of computer-generated written feedback for improving L2 writing skills and (2) verify how moderators (i.e., adopted technology, task types, and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reynolds, Barry Lee; Kao, Chian-Wen; Huang, Yun-yin – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2021
Although researchers have investigated the effects automated writing evaluation (AWE) and teacher corrective feedback have on second language (L2) writing performance, these studies have conflated two different variables--feedback source and perceptions of feedback source. Using a quasi-experimental design, two groups of second language English…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Taichi Yamashita – ProQuest LLC, 2021
This dissertation reports on the evaluation of a computer-mediated collaborative animation description task, where synchronous corrective feedback (SCF) serves as the primary source for grammar learning. The evaluation was conducted in an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing program at a large research university in the United States. Using…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction, Collaborative Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Altamimi, Omar Abdullah; Masood, Mona – Arab World English Journal, 2021
The past two decades witnessed increased attention in the role of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in improving the English as a second language (ESL) students' written linguistic accuracy. Several methods were suggested, including the use of the electronic means of providing corrective feedback. The electronic methods proved to be effective…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Language Teachers, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Woodworth, Johanathan; Barkaoui, Khaled – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
While feedback is widely considered essential for second language (L2) writing development (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012), teachers may not always be able to provide their learners with immediate and frequent corrective feedback. Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems can help respond to this challenge by providing L2 learners with written…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bonner, Euan; Lege, Ryan; Frazier, Erin – Teaching English with Technology, 2023
Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful type of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that simulates how humans organize language and are able to interpret, predict, and generate text. This allows for contextual understanding of natural human language which enables the LLM to understand conversational human input and respond in a natural manner. Recent…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Artificial Intelligence, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
John, Paul; Woll, Nina – Research-publishing.net, 2018
Our study assessed the performance of two Grammar Checkers (GCs), Grammarly and Virtual Writing Tutor, and the grammar checking function in Microsoft Word on a broad range of grammatical errors. The errors occurred in both authentic English as a Second Language (ESL) compositions and simple sentences we generated ourselves. We verified the…
Descriptors: Grammar, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vakili, Shokoufeh; Ebadi, Saman – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Theoretically grounded in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory of mind, Dynamic Assessment (DA) provides researchers with the opportunity to investigate different aspects of learners' developmental trajectory, including the ways they overcome their errors. As a qualitative inquiry into the nature of errors reflecting learners' development in academic…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Zhenzhen; Chen, Weichao; Jia, Jiyou; Le, Huixiao – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Despite the growing interest in investigating the pedagogical application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems, studies on the process of AWE-supported writing are still scant. Adopting activity theory as the framework, this qualitative study aims to examine how students incorporated AWE feedback into their writing in an English as a…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Teaching Methods, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Colpitts, Bradley D. F.; Past, Travis Hunter – JALT CALL Journal, 2019
The present study compared the efficacy of computer-mediated peer corrective feedback (CF) among two groups of high-proficiency (n=11) and low-proficiency (n=19) postsecondary Japanese EFL students. They completed a 10-week process writing composition, during which the students were given explicit instruction in metalinguistic peer CF. They then…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Peer Evaluation, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Won-Young Koh – English Teaching, 2017
This study investigated the appropriate ways in offering immediate automated writing feedback within the framework of process-based writing pedagogy by comparing relative effects of two different automated writing evaluation (AWE) system application types on improving writing performance. The experiment took an initiative step in elucidating at…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, Process Approach (Writing), Feedback (Response)
Han, Jining – ProQuest LLC, 2019
With the rapid development of Web 2.0 in the field of education, which allows users to interact and collaborate with teachers and peers on the web, many researchers have focused on exploring the developments of using Course Manage System (CMS) in service of L2 writing (e.g., Chun, 2011; Warschauer & Grimes, 2007). Simultaneously, participation…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Web 2.0 Technologies, Case Studies, Second Language Learning
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3