Publication Date
In 2025 | 8 |
Since 2024 | 24 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 84 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 133 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 172 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 190 |
Foreign Countries | 190 |
Writing Instruction | 190 |
English (Second Language) | 154 |
Second Language Learning | 148 |
Second Language Instruction | 143 |
Feedback (Response) | 134 |
Teaching Methods | 83 |
Grammar | 57 |
Student Attitudes | 54 |
Writing Evaluation | 51 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Al-Jarf, Reima | 3 |
Colpitts, Bradley D. F. | 2 |
Ebadi, Saman | 2 |
Icy Lee | 2 |
Karim, Khaled | 2 |
Lee, Icy | 2 |
Lira-Gonzales, Maria-Lourdes | 2 |
Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales | 2 |
Mohebbi, Hassan | 2 |
Nassaji, Hossein | 2 |
Pauline Mak | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Teachers | 4 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Location
China | 22 |
Japan | 18 |
Iran | 16 |
Taiwan | 12 |
Canada | 10 |
Saudi Arabia | 10 |
South Korea | 9 |
Thailand | 9 |
Turkey | 9 |
Hong Kong | 7 |
Indonesia | 7 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English… | 4 |
Test of English for… | 3 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 2 |
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jiahe Gu; Erhan Aslan – Journal of Response to Writing, 2025
Effective written feedback is crucial to student learning and developing writing skills. Responding to student writing is a multifaceted and complex process that requires a more nuanced understanding of second language writing research. This study explored teachers' beliefs and practices about written feedback, which may be influenced by a range…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Language Teachers, Error Correction
Haiyang Sun; Mingchao Wang – Language Teaching Research, 2025
Peer feedback has been widely used in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classes, but its effect is highly variable and its quality and validity are often questioned by students as well as teachers. This research aims to explore the effects of teacher intervention on student use of different types of peer feedback and on their…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction, Peer Evaluation
Derek Hopper; Neil Bowen – rEFLections, 2023
Many writing teachers believe that giving written corrective feedback (WCF) is an important part of learning to write. Equally, students like to receive it. However, most previous research on WCF has looked at its overall effectiveness, with less attention paid to the differences of opinion between students and their teachers, and the implications…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction
Bei Cai; Ziyu He; Hong Fu; Yang Zheng; Yanjie Song – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2025
Much research has applied automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to English writing instruction; however, understanding how students internalize and apply this feedback to reduce writing errors is difficult, largely due to the personal and private nature of this process. Therefore, this research utilized eye-tracking technology to explore the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Majors (Students), Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Nipaspong, Pajaree – PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 2022
This study aimed to determine how teachers' online written corrective feedback (WCF) affected university students' self-regulation in writing and how the effects differed among students of different English proficiency levels. The participants were 27 second-year university students enrolled in a required online writing course. Throughout the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), College Students, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Nato Pachuashvili – IAFOR Journal of Education, 2024
Giving feedback has always been the backbone of the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing class. Written corrective feedback focuses on responding to students' written work by extensively correcting their errors or offering constructive suggestions for improvements. The process of digitalization of education offered an alternative to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction
Attila M. Wind – Journal of Response to Writing, 2024
The positive effects of dynamic written corrective feedback (DWCF) on linguistic accuracy are well-documented (Evans et al., 2010). However, studies on DWCF without exception have adopted a pretest--posttest research design; therefore, they were unable to explore the dynamics of development (Larsen-Freeman, 2006). In addition, all previous DWCF…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Undergraduate Students, Essays
Zhang, Xueni; Zhang, Runhan – SAGE Open, 2023
Error correction has been one of the central themes in accounting for potential gains in second language (L2) writing. While a wide range of empirical studies focused on the effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) on learners' writing outcomes, few of them have specifically examined the feedback process, or its potential role as a shaping…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Agurtzane Azkarai; Asier Calzada – Classroom Discourse, 2024
Collaborative writing (CW) tasks require heightened Engagement with Language (EWL), as their learning potential has been shown to be mediated by the number of language-related episodes (LREs) or learners' patterns of interaction. Recent research on CW with young populations has investigated different dimensions of EWL, but a holistic view of the…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Pernille Fiskerstrand; Siv M. Gamlem – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2024
The quality of feedback interactions, when young pupils write, influences their learning processes. Still, teachers tend to use feedback that provides little information to enhance pupils' understanding and learning regarding their literacy skills. More knowledge about feedback interactions for young pupils as they write is needed. Thus, we wanted…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Oral Language, Writing Instruction, Literacy
Khadawardi, Hanadi Abdulrahman – English Language Teaching, 2021
Debate about the value and the effect of both kinds of corrective feedback, explicit and implicit on second language writing has been prominent in recent years. Second language writing researchers investigate whether written implicit corrective feedback facilitates the acquisition of linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Hanne Roothooft; Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola; Bram Bulté – Language Teaching Research, 2025
Second language (L2) writing research has demonstrated that young learners discuss linguistic issues, make use of feedback, and show a generally positive disposition toward writing tasks. However, many issues deserve further investigation. Regarding task implementation, few studies have been conducted with young learners writing individually, and…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Accuracy, Writing Instruction
Yoshimasa Ogawa – Journal of Response to Writing, 2025
This study explored a way to help Japanese university students write longer essays while maintaining grammatical accuracy. Participants were three groups of students enrolled in a one-year EFL course in different academic years (N = 111), and the number of words they wrote in 30 minutes and the number of errors made per 100 words were compared. To…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Accuracy, Writing Evaluation