Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2 |
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Essays | 2 |
| Writing Assignments | 2 |
| Writing Processes | 2 |
| Academic Discourse | 1 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Contracts | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ali Momen | 1 |
| Chad C. Tossell | 1 |
| Ewart J. de Visser | 1 |
| Katrina Cooley | 1 |
| Nathan L. Tenhundfeld | 1 |
| Rogerson, Ann M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChad C. Tossell; Nathan L. Tenhundfeld; Ali Momen; Katrina Cooley; Ewart J. de Visser – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
This article examined student experiences before and after an essay writing assignment that required the use of ChatGPT within an undergraduate engineering course. Utilizing a pre-post study design, we gathered data from 24 participants to evaluate ChatGPT's support for both completing and grading an essay assignment, exploring its educational…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Computer Software, Artificial Intelligence, Grading
Rogerson, Ann M. – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2017
Detecting contract cheating in written submissions can be difficult beyond direct plagiarism detectable via technology. Successfully identifying potential cases of contract cheating in written work such as essays and reports is largely dependent on the experience of assessors and knowledge of student. It is further dependent on their familiarity…
Descriptors: Cheating, Essays, Graduate Students, Integrity
