Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Writing (Composition) | 2 |
| Writing Processes | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Discourse | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Johnson, Robert L. | 1 |
| Penny, James A. | 1 |
| Samuelson, Dianne | 1 |
| Thomson, Jennifer M. | 1 |
| Van Der Steen, Steffie | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Digit Span Test | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVan Der Steen, Steffie; Samuelson, Dianne; Thomson, Jennifer M. – Written Communication, 2017
This study addresses the current debate about the beneficial effects of text processing software on students with different working memory (WM) during the process of academic writing, especially with regard to the ability to display higher-level conceptual thinking. A total of 54 graduate students (15 male, 39 female) wrote one essay by hand and…
Descriptors: Word Processing, Keyboarding (Data Entry), Writing (Composition), Educational Benefits
Penny, James A.; Johnson, Robert L. – Assessing Writing, 2011
When multiple raters score a writing sample, on occasion they will award discrepant scores. To report a single score to the examinee, some method of resolving those differences must be applied to the ratings before an operational score can be reported. Several forms of resolving score discrepancies have been described in the literature. Initial…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Scores, Academic Achievement, Models
