Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 14 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 25 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 54 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 57 |
Writing Evaluation | 57 |
Writing Tests | 57 |
Scoring | 23 |
Essays | 19 |
Scores | 19 |
Writing Skills | 17 |
English (Second Language) | 16 |
Second Language Learning | 16 |
Automation | 14 |
Correlation | 14 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Utah | 2 |
Australia | 1 |
California | 1 |
Canada (Toronto) | 1 |
China | 1 |
District of Columbia | 1 |
Iran | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Taiwan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jessie S. Barrot – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
This bibliometric analysis attempts to map out the scientific literature on automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems for teaching, learning, and assessment. A total of 170 documents published between 2002 and 2021 in Social Sciences Citation Index journals were reviewed from four dimensions, namely size (productivity and citations), time…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Writing Tests
Huawei, Shi; Aryadoust, Vahid – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems are developed based on interdisciplinary research and technological advances such as natural language processing, computer sciences, and latent semantic analysis. Despite a steady increase in research publications in this area, the results of AWE investigations are often mixed, and their validity may be…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Automation
Yue Huang; Joshua Wilson – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, used as formative assessment tools in writing classrooms, are promising for enhancing instruction and improving student performance. Although meta-analytic evidence supports AWE's effectiveness in various contexts, research on its effectiveness in the U.S. K-12 setting has lagged behind its…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills, Writing Tests, Writing Instruction
Almusharraf, Norah; Alotaibi, Hind – Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2023
Evaluating written texts is believed to be a time-consuming process that can lack consistency and objectivity. Automated essay scoring (AES) can provide solutions to some of the limitations of human scoring. This research aimed to evaluate the performance of one AES system, Grammarly, in comparison to human raters. Both approaches' performances…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Essay Tests, Essays
Joshua Kloppers – International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2023
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) software is an increasingly popular tool for English second language learners. However, research on the accuracy of such software has been both scarce and largely limited in its scope. As such, this article broadens the field of research on AWE accuracy by using a mixed design to holistically evaluate the…
Descriptors: Grammar, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Computer Assisted Instruction
Yi Gui – ProQuest LLC, 2024
This study explores using transfer learning in machine learning for natural language processing (NLP) to create generic automated essay scoring (AES) models, providing instant online scoring for statewide writing assessments in K-12 education. The goal is to develop an instant online scorer that is generalizable to any prompt, addressing the…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Natural Language Processing, Writing Evaluation, Scoring
Michael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Grantee Submission, 2022
Written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is a formative assessment approach for screening and progress monitoring. To extend evaluation of WE-CBM, we compared hand-calculated and automated scoring approaches in relation to the number of screening samples needed per student for valid scores, the long-term predictive validity and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Predictive Validity, Formative Evaluation
Michael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2022
Written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) is a formative assessment approach for screening and progress monitoring. To extend evaluation of WE-CBM, we compared hand-calculated and automated scoring approaches in relation to the number of screening samples needed per student for valid scores, the long-term predictive validity and…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Predictive Validity, Formative Evaluation
Shoeb Saleh; Abdullah Ibrahim Alsubhi – Language Testing in Asia, 2025
This study inspected how techno-competence in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven evaluations affected EFL learners' boredom, self-esteem, and writing skills. To do so, 66 Saudi Arabian male students from Saudi Arabia participated in the study. They were then split into the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). While the CG was…
Descriptors: Self Esteem, Writing Skills, Artificial Intelligence, English (Second Language)
Potter, Andrew; Wilson, Joshua – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) provides automatic writing feedback and scoring to support student writing and revising. The purpose of the present study was to analyze a statewide implementation of an AWE software (n = 114,582) in grades 4-11. The goals of the study were to evaluate: (1) to what extent AWE features were used; (2) if equity and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Scoring
Conner, Carlin; Henry, Alyssa R.; Solari, Emily J.; Zajic, Matthew C. – Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 2022
Background and aims: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, tele-health has gained popularity for both providing services and delivering assessments to children with disabilities. In this manuscript, we discuss the process of collecting standardized oral language, reading, and writing tele-assessment data with early elementary children with autism spectrum…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Written Language, Writing Skills, Writing Evaluation
Sterett H. Mercer; Joanna E. Cannon – Grantee Submission, 2022
We evaluated the validity of an automated approach to learning progress assessment (aLPA) for English written expression. Participants (n = 105) were students in Grades 2-12 who had parent-identified learning difficulties and received academic tutoring through a community-based organization. Participants completed narrative writing samples in the…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, Learning Problems, Learning Disabilities
Correnti, Richard; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Wang, Elaine; Litman, Diane; Rahimi, Zahra; Kisa, Zahid – Reading Research Quarterly, 2020
Despite the importance of analytic text-based writing, relatively little is known about how to teach to this important skill. A persistent barrier to conducting research that would provide insight on best practices for teaching this form of writing is a lack of outcome measures that assess students' analytic text-based writing development and that…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Sari, Elif; Han, Turgay – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2021
Providing both effective feedback applications and reliable assessment practices are two central issues in ESL/EFL writing instruction contexts. Giving individual feedback is very difficult in crowded classes as it requires a great amount of time and effort for instructors. Moreover, instructors likely employ inconsistent assessment procedures,…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
Wilson, Joshua; Chen, Dandan; Sandbank, Micheal P.; Hebert, Michael – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2019
The present study examined issues pertaining to the reliability of writing assessment in the elementary grades, and among samples of struggling and nonstruggling writers. The present study also extended nascent research on the reliability and the practical applications of automated essay scoring (AES) systems in Response to Intervention frameworks…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Scores, Writing Tests