Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 154 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 927 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2716 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5594 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 249 |
| Teachers | 183 |
| Researchers | 118 |
| Students | 59 |
| Administrators | 48 |
| Policymakers | 47 |
| Parents | 18 |
| Counselors | 6 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Texas | 242 |
| Canada | 208 |
| Florida | 164 |
| Iran | 138 |
| California | 129 |
| North Carolina | 119 |
| Australia | 104 |
| Pennsylvania | 98 |
| China | 90 |
| Turkey | 90 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 85 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 32 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 45 |
| Does not meet standards | 46 |
Peer reviewedDuffelmeyer, Frederick A. – Journal of Reading, 1980
Concludes that inferential reading test questions are as likely to be passage dependent as factual test questions. (MKM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Item Analysis, Reading Research, Reading Tests
Peer reviewedLehr, Fran – Journal of Reading, 1979
Reviews ERIC documents dealing with the preparation and use of informal measures of reading comprehension. (DD)
Descriptors: Informal Assessment, Informal Reading Inventories, Literature Reviews, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedJongsma, Eugene A. – Journal of Reading, 1980
Describes the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests and evaluates their suitability for testing reading, concluding that they appear to be carefully developed survey tests of general reading achievement. (DD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Reading Achievement, Reading Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedHudgins, Bryce B.; And Others – Journal of Educational Research, 1979
Intermediate students scored better on reading comprehension tests when questions on content were interspersed in the text. (JD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Intermediate Grades, Questioning Techniques, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedCook, Ann; And Others – National Elementary Principal, 1980
Examines the controversy surrounding the administration of the Metropolitan Achievement Test on reading and the subsequent recall of the results data by the chancellor of the New York City schools. (IRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Reading, Reading Tests, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewedSchwartz, Judy I. – Kappa Delta Pi Record, 1976
Testing is a means of obtaining information about people and their status. Too often tests and testing govern us as educators rather than being governed by us. Reviews the problem and offers some suggestions. (Editor)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Evaluation Criteria, Reading Tests, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewedLesiak, Judi – Psychology in the Schools, 1977
Compares effectiveness of the Gates-MacGinitie Readiness Skills Test (G-M) and Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA) for predicting reading achievement in grade one and studies whether either test differentially predicts reading in an i.t.a. approach or a t.o. sight approach. G-M was a better predictor than ITPA for both groups.…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Predictive Measurement, Reading Achievement
Peer reviewedJohnson, David A.; Wollersheim, Janet P. – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1976
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Performance, Reading Ability
Peer reviewedBarton, Karen E.; Huynh, Huynh – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2003
Studied differences in the types of errors made by students with disabilities on a multiple choice reading test administered under oral reading accommodations. Findings for 2,999 high school students suggest that it is safe to adhere the same meaning to test scores for disability groups even when the test is administered under different…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Error Patterns, High School Students, High Schools
Peer reviewedJournal of Reading, 1990
Argues that teachers should look at standardized tests first before designing tests that will evaluate students' critical thinking and reading. Describes five standardized tests appropriate for use with college students and adults. (RS)
Descriptors: Adults, Critical Reading, Critical Thinking, Higher Education
Peer reviewedJongsma, Kathleen Stumpf – Reading Teacher, 1989
Discusses several new educational assessment procedures implemented in Illinois and Michigan school districts. (MM)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Effectiveness
Popham, W. James; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Principal, 1990
All educators must possess knowledge of student assessment practices. This article outlines basic testing concepts and test construction and usage skills for teachers and administrators. Includes nine references. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Elementary Education, Measures (Individuals), Principals
Peters, Charles W.; Wixson, Karen K. – Learning, 1989
A new breed of standardized reading tests, slated for use in Michigan and Illinois, measures integrative thinking instead of isolated skills and gives teachers a valuable diagnostic tool. A breakdown of content areas is given, as well as a preview of actual questions. (IAH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Reading Comprehension, Reading Processes, Reading Tests
Peer reviewedFoos, Paul W.; Fisher, Ronald P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1988
A study involving 105 undergraduates assessed the value of testing as a means of increasing, rather than simply monitoring, learning. Results indicate that fill-in-the-blank and items requiring student inferences were more effective, respectively, than multiple-choice tests and verbatim items in furthering student learning. (TJH)
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Reading Tests
Carroll, John B. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1988
Refutes Leslie MacLean and Harvey Goldstein's charges (in the January 1988 "Kappan") that the National Assessment of Educational Progress Reading Proficiency Scale is based on a single assumption (reading proficiency) accounting for responses to all reading tasks. Characterizes the scale as developmental, with points corresponding to…
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Elementary Secondary Education, Reading Skills, Reading Tests


