Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 45 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 285 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 687 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1390 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Ballator, Nada | 42 |
| Jerry, Laura J. | 40 |
| Graham, Steve | 24 |
| Harris, Karen R. | 13 |
| Parr, Judy M. | 8 |
| Vanneman, Alan | 8 |
| Wilson, Joshua | 8 |
| Berninger, Virginia W. | 7 |
| Doolittle, Martha | 7 |
| Olinghouse, Natalie G. | 7 |
| White, Sheida | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 70 |
| Practitioners | 58 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Parents | 11 |
| Policymakers | 8 |
| Students | 7 |
| Researchers | 6 |
| Community | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
Location
| Texas | 49 |
| Turkey | 47 |
| Iran | 44 |
| Florida | 42 |
| Australia | 38 |
| China | 37 |
| California | 35 |
| Canada | 34 |
| Texas (Houston) | 28 |
| Texas (Austin) | 25 |
| Indonesia | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 11 |
| Does not meet standards | 6 |
Bridgeman, Brent; Laitusis, Cara Cahalan; Cline, Frederick – College Board, 2007
The current study used three data sources to estimate time requirements for different item types on the now current SAT Reasoning Test™. First, we estimated times from a computer-adaptive version of the SAT® (SAT CAT) that automatically recorded item times. Second, we observed students as they answered SAT questions under strict time limits and…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Test Items, Thinking Skills, Computer Assisted Testing
Reese, Julie Ann – ProQuest LLC, 2009
To compete in the work force today, the global and national economy demands our 21st century learners to write efficiently, effectively, and coherently. Due to minimal progress in writing scores over the past decade, spelling has increasingly become a subject of national debate as poor spelling can impede a writer's ability to formulate ideas and…
Descriptors: Writing Achievement, Learning Disabilities, Intervention, Spelling
Doolittle, Martha – Online Submission, 2009
Austin Independent School District allocated federal NCLB Title I, Part A funds to 68 school-wide campuses (52 elementary, 11 middle, and 5 high schools) where the percentages of low-income children ranged from 45% to 99%. Other funds were allocated to provide services district wide to students, staff, and families. This report summarizes Title I…
Descriptors: School Districts, Federal Aid, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students
Applebee, Arthur N.; Langer, Judith A. – English Journal, 2009
It has been almost 30 years since the last systematic look at writing instruction in middle schools and high schools in the United States (Applebee, Writing). Since that report, there have been a number of significant changes in the contexts in which teachers teach and in which their students learn to write. Stretching back to the 1969-70 school…
Descriptors: Middle Schools, Writing Achievement, State Standards, High Stakes Tests
Montgomery County Public Schools, 2011
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) "Special Education at a Glance," which includes a copy of the "Guide to Planning and Assessing School-Based Special Education Programs," provides in a single document, information about the special education population at each Montgomery County (Maryland public school, including…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Counties, Disabilities, Special Education
Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA. – 1997
This booklet contains the Writing Framework for the 1998 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The Framework describes the basis for the 1998 Writing Assessment, the types of writing assessed, and the methods for scoring student responses. This Framework was developed during 1989-90 in preparation for the 1992 NAEP Writing…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Test Format, Testing Programs
Sockwell, Recardo V. – 1992
A study determined the effectiveness of two computer-assisted programs for writing/language instruction. Three first-grade classes and three second-grade classes at each of five Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools (CMS) were selected for the study. Two schools were using Write to Read for the first time, two schools were using Acceleration Station 2000…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Primary Education, Writing Achievement
North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh. – 1997
This manual contains typed texts for each level of the Summative Booklist for Narrative Texts. The 38 typed texts are included for use with running records and oral reading strategies analysis. Each form and/or procedure is accompanied by specific explanations, directions, and where appropriate, examples to guide usage. The manual is intended to…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Oral Reading, Primary Education, Reading Achievement
Johnson, Judy A.; Bardos, Achilles N.; Tayebi, Kandi A. – 2003
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) and writing achievement in junior high students (aged 11-15 years) with and without written expression disabilities. Ninety-six students with (n=48) and without (n=48) written expression disabilities were administered the Das-Naglieri:…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Junior High School Students, Junior High Schools, Learning Disabilities
Belcheir, Marcia J.; Cucek, Mira – 2002
Boise State University, Idaho, now has a better idea how well entering freshmen perform in reading, writing, and mathematics because of an Academic Profile instrument administered to freshmen at Boise State and other institutions. In general, Boise State students performed somewhat below other freshmen. The testing was initiated in response to the…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Preparation, Core Curriculum, Higher Education
Washington Office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Olympia. – 2001
This document includes a booklet and a presentation guide. The booklet contains the anchor papers used to score the 2001 Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) in writing, grade 10. Anchor papers are concrete examples that illustrate the intent of the scoring guides. The papers in the booklet exemplify the full range of score points…
Descriptors: Grade 10, High Schools, Scoring, Test Interpretation
Popp, Sharon E. Osborn; Ryan, Joseph M. – 2002
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the selection of benchmark writing samples influences the assessment of students' writing quality. More than 300 grade 3 writing samples were scored in two separate rating sessions. Within each scoring session, raters used a different set of benchmark writing samples. Raw ratings were analyzed…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Elementary School Students, Primary Education, Scoring Rubrics
North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh. Instructional Services. – 2000
This 1999-2000 report of student performance in writing provides information on student performance on the North Carolina Writing Assessment at Grades 4, 7, and 10. Noting that the annual writing assessment, a component of the North Carolina Testing Program, is also a component of the ABCs Accountability Program at Grades 4 and 7 and at Grade 10…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grade 10, Grade 4, Grade 7
Peer reviewedBelanoff, Pat – Journal of Basic Writing, 1991
Challenges several myths about writing assessment held by educators. Argues for the validity of assessments developed within particular environments for particular purposes agreed to by those teaching within those environments. Celebrates the lack of conformity in grading as a sign of a rich and nurturing environment for the development of writing…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Basic Writing, Foreign Students, Grading
Peer reviewedSanchez, Emilio; Rueda, Mercedes I. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1991
Focuses on the relationship between the development of segmental awareness and dyslexia. Finds that students in two training programs that taught the skills required to use phonemes performed as well as normal readers on phoneme segmentation tasks. Notes that the improvements were correlated in dictation but not in reading. (RS)
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Primary Education, Program Effectiveness, Reading Achievement

Direct link
