Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 171 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1191 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2834 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5410 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 303 |
| Researchers | 300 |
| Teachers | 192 |
| Administrators | 39 |
| Students | 28 |
| Parents | 27 |
| Policymakers | 21 |
| Counselors | 16 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| Community | 3 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 218 |
| Canada | 175 |
| Australia | 164 |
| United Kingdom | 148 |
| United States | 146 |
| China | 141 |
| Germany | 123 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 98 |
| Netherlands | 91 |
| Japan | 75 |
| Sweden | 70 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 6 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 10 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Sanders, Nicholas M.; Tzeng, Ovid J. L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
Study failed to yield evidence that performance in a systematic-concept task can be significantly facilitated, in comparison with rote-task performance, if more time is allowed for the operation of what Metzger has called systematic concept formation. (Authors)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation, Data Analysis, Individual Differences
Miller, Leonard D. – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1973
The present study was a systematic attempt to determine what selected characteristics tended to differentiate between fraternity and independent men. Three research questions were investigated. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences
Bauer, David H. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1973
This article emphasizes identifying for the practitioner those qualities of situations and individuals which have been shown to have major effects on performance in testing situations. Recommendations for testing practices are made, and the dangers inherent in acceptance of test results as the sole basis for personnel decisions are pointed out.…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Guessing (Tests), Individual Differences, Motivation
Peer reviewedPalmer, Albert B.; Wohl, Julian – College Student Journal, 1972
The authors conclude that the differences outlined in this study are quite apparent in working with honors and nonhonors students. Classes with honors students are characterized by a freedom of thought and behavior rarely found outside that group. The same kinds of behavior pervade their social relationships also. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Honors Curriculum, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedSchreiner, Kathy – School Management, 1972
Descriptors: Differentiated Staffs, Individual Differences, Individualized Instruction, Open Plan Schools
Peer reviewedHamilton, Vernon – British Journal of Psychology, 1972
The present study, and the development of the instrument for the measurement of conservation, arose in the context of wishing to demonstrate finely discriminating individual differences in this cognitive capacity. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Conservation (Concept), Developmental Psychology, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedMorgan, Arlene H.; Hilgard, Ernest R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
The use of the kinesthetic aftereffect as a descriptive personality variable is strongly discouraged by the results of the present study. (Authors)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Figural Aftereffects, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedKish, George B.; Donnenwerth, Gregory V. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972
The personality characteristics which were found to be related to stimulus seeking seem to follow from the basic premise that the stimulus seeker has a stronger than average need to seek out and approach situations, activities, and ideas which are novel, changing, complex, surprising, or more intense. (Author)
Descriptors: Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences, Parent Child Relationship, Patterned Responses
Peer reviewedDyer, Elaine D.; And Others – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Age Differences, Educational Background, Individual Characteristics, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedJensen, Arthur R. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Aural Learning, College Students, Individual Differences, Memory
Peer reviewedEscalona, S. K.; Corman, H. H. – Human Development, 1971
Studies the effects of mothers' presence and absence on two infants from birth to two years. (AJ)
Descriptors: Behavior Development, Cognitive Development, Individual Differences, Infant Behavior
Peer reviewedWright, Jack M.; Worthy, Morgan – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavior Patterns, Individual Differences, Leadership
Peer reviewedSpivack, George; Levine, Murray – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Adolescents, Individual Differences, Males, Motivation
Peer reviewedStufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Educational Experiments, Evaluation Methods, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedCassel, Russell N. – College Student Journal, 1971
The author blames the use of group intelligence tests and the subsequent reliance on I.Q. for the lack of attention given to individual differences, in particular the characteristics of the disadvantaged child. (BY)
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Group Testing, Individual Differences, Intelligence Quotient
