Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 179 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1020 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2891 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6363 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 506 |
| Practitioners | 318 |
| Researchers | 186 |
| Administrators | 167 |
| Policymakers | 92 |
| Media Staff | 21 |
| Students | 19 |
| Community | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 260 |
| Australia | 250 |
| Canada | 222 |
| California | 174 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 150 |
| Texas | 103 |
| China | 100 |
| United States | 97 |
| New Zealand | 88 |
| Turkey | 84 |
| Netherlands | 83 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 8 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 15 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Wile, Marcia Z. – Educational Technology, 1979
Discusses a learner-centered evaluation model designed to provide feedback on instructional products in the context of learner needs, expectations, and experiences. (RAO)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Materials, Summative Evaluation
McPherson-Turner, Cherry – Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1979
Introduces a checklist of instructional design and programing guidelines developed for use by authors of CAI materials. It provides a practical formative evaluation tool for nonspecialists desiring to improve their own CAI materials with minimal support from consultants or more experienced authors. (Author)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Computer Assisted Instruction, Formative Evaluation, Programing
Dick, Walter – Journal of Instructional Development, 1980
Notes the difficulties of conducting meaningful research in formative evaluation; reviews issues in the administration, breadth of applicability, and theoretical bases of formative evaluation; and suggests areas where research is still needed. (Author/JD)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Instructional Development, Research Needs, Research Problems
Debert, Robert – NSPI Journal, 1979
Deals with the prescription of effective revisions on the basis of developmental testing data. The basic procedure presented in the game is based on Robert Stake's evaluation matrix; it involves comparing different types of tryout data with original plans for the instructional material. (Author/JEG)
Descriptors: Educational Development, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewedSholam-Salomon, Varda – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1990
Questions assumptions that process variables have fixed meanings, discretely contribute to outcomes, and have a decontextualized net worth, evaluated by their correlations with outcomes. Suggests conceptual framework that integrates theory-driven and discovery-oriented strategies into cyclical, ecologically oriented model. (Author/NB)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Models, Psychotherapy, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedLapine, Louise – Evaluation Practice, 1987
The use of the Nominal Group Technique to identify areas for formative evaluation is described. Group characteristics, pertinent group questions, and advantages of the method are outlined. The process depersonalizes results, puts individual concerns into perspective, and focuses on improving the program (not on blaming or evaluating personnel).…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Formative Evaluation, Group Discussion, Program Evaluation
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam – Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1991
Describes and discusses how systematic formative evaluation can be applied to different types of human performance technology (HPT) interventions. Three components of evaluation are explained, six stages of formative evaluation are described, five types of formative evaluation are explained, and strategies for micro analysis of formative data on…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Research Methodology
Saba, Farhad, Ed. – Distance Education Report, 2000
Discussion of the growth of distance education programs focuses on program evaluation. Describes the American Evaluation Association http://www.eval.org, the ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation (ERIC/AE) http://ericae.net; lists steps for planning formative evaluation; and considers the appropriate uses of new technology. (LRW)
Descriptors: Appropriate Technology, Distance Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedTheall, Michael; Centra, John A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Illustrates how the scholarship of teaching could be assessed, recognized, and rewarded, addressing both formative and summative evaluations. Addresses the question of who should determine the standards and criteria by which to review and critique the scholarship of teaching and whether studies in the scholarship of teaching should be required to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation
Wininger, Steven R. – Teaching of Psychology, 2005
Two studies supported the efficacy of a structured method for providing students with feedback on exams and means of using the teaching potential of exams, collectively referred to as formative summative assessment (FSA). In the first study, students responded positively to the method. In the second study, students enrolled in 2 sections of…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Educational Psychology, Control Groups, Formative Evaluation
Ayala, Carlos – Science Scope, 2005
A formative assessment can provide a snapshot of what a student knows and is able to do. It can include written tests, performance tasks, formal or informal questioning, or teacher observations embedded in a unit of study. The information gathered from formative assessments is then interpreted and used to further student learning. Such assessment…
Descriptors: Feedback, Student Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Guidelines
Buckendahl, Chad W.; Plake, Barbara S.; Impara, James C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2004
As part of Nebraska's assessment and accountability system, districts' local assessment systems are evaluated for their psychometric quality. This article provides an overview of a two-stage evaluation strategy, discusses how it was applied in Nebraska, and presents results from the first three years of the evaluation process. Benefits of the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Formative Evaluation, Accountability, School Districts
McIntire, Todd – Technology & Learning, 2005
This article looks at stages one and two of a three-stage process for success. Over the last decade, schools and districts have become increasingly sophisticated in their collection, storage, and analysis of data. And with the rise of NCLB, the focus of data analysis has been largely trained on ways to help schools achieve Adequate Yearly…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement, Formative Evaluation
Harlen, Wynne – Curriculum Journal, 2005
This article concerns the use of assessment for learning (formative assessment) and assessment of learning (summative assessment), and how one can affect the other in either positive or negative ways. It makes a case for greater use of teachers' judgements in summative assessment, the reasons for this being found in the research that is reviewed…
Descriptors: Motivation, High Stakes Tests, Formative Evaluation, Student Evaluation
Taras, Maddalena – British Journal of Educational Studies, 2005
This paper wishes to clarify the definitions of the central terms relating to assessment. It argues that all assessment begins with summative assessment (which is a judgement) and that formative assessment is in fact summative assessment plus feedback which is used by the learner.
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Definitions, Feedback

Direct link
