Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 179 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1020 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2891 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6363 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 506 |
| Practitioners | 318 |
| Researchers | 186 |
| Administrators | 167 |
| Policymakers | 92 |
| Media Staff | 21 |
| Students | 19 |
| Community | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 260 |
| Australia | 250 |
| Canada | 222 |
| California | 174 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 150 |
| Texas | 103 |
| China | 100 |
| United States | 97 |
| New Zealand | 88 |
| Turkey | 84 |
| Netherlands | 83 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 8 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 15 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Schumacher, Nestor – Meta, 1973
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Formative Evaluation, Idioms, Literature
Peer reviewedDobbs, Stephen Mark – Studies in Art Education, 1972
Major drawback of traditional evaluation is its emphasis on outcome" or terminal performance; what is needed are more process-oriented methods of assessment. Author describes Program Analysis" as a possible model. (Author/MB)
Descriptors: Art Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Feedback
Brandenburg, Dale C. – Performance and Instruction, 1982
Discusses the design of effective questionnaires based on the concept of a hierarchical classification of Levels of Information: global (Level I), general concept (Level II), and specific (Level III). By tying question types to the information desired, the entire questionnaire can be improved. (JJD)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Data Collection, Formative Evaluation, Item Analysis
Bilingual Resources, 1980
Designed to guide project evaluators in determining the type of evaluation appropriate to projects; explains formative and summative evaluations, gives examples of each, and explains the evaluator's role in each method. (Journal availability: National Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, 5151 State University Drive,…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedTalmage, Harriet; And Others – Journal of Nutrition Education, 1981
Study describes the use of learning environment data to evaluate the effect of new curriculum at the formative stage of development. Results support the use of learning environment data as a diagnostic instrument in formative evaluation of curriculum development efforts. (Author/DS)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedDoty, Pamela – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
In its role as a broker between the scientific community and the Congress, the Office of Technology Assessment evaluates the soundness of scientific conclusions for policy makers and ensures that research findings are included in formative policy analysis. (Author)
Descriptors: Agency Role, Evaluators, Formative Evaluation, Legislators
Rafe-uz-Zaman – Educational Broadcasting International, 1981
Despite a number of organizational limitations and shortcomings, a pilot project in Pakistan designed to make adults functionally literate with the help of television has been demonstrated viable. Three references are listed. (Author/LLS)
Descriptors: Adult Literacy, Cost Effectiveness, Developing Nations, Educational Television
Clark, Richard E. – Instructional Innovator, 1982
Suggests that new developments in prescriptive theory offer an opportunity for instructional designers to combine research and practice in developing instruction. Ways in which instructional theories can facilitate practical applications are suggested. (MER)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Teaching, Educational Research, Epistemology, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedRoe, John E.; Edwards, Keith J. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978
Group therapy sessions were rated using four Hill interaction matrix variables and Truax-Carkhuff variables of empathy, immediacy, self-exploration, and confrontation. Canonical correlation analysis suggested the two systems converged along a dimension labeled initiating skills. Hill's system showed that immediacy, conceptualized by Traux and…
Descriptors: Correlation, Empathy, Formative Evaluation, Group Dynamics
Kinsey, David C. – Adult Education, 1981
Examines the usefulness of participatory evaluation in program development. Emphasizes formative evaluation and suggests approaches for planning participation in evaluation and adapting methods to facilitate use of participatory evaluation in adult and nonformal education programs. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Nonformal Education
Kandaswamy, Subramaniam – Educational Technology, 1980
Reviews a number of models, paradigms, designs, techniques, and procedures for the evaluation of instructional materials. (RAO)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Flow Charts, Formative Evaluation
Gibb, G. O.; Searl, J. W. – Journal of Educational Television and Other Media, 1979
Describes two occasions where television has been used to record a series of tutorials in mathematics and earth science to improve the performance of those conducting the tutorials. The opportunity for playback, analysis, and discussion with colleagues was especially valuable. (Author)
Descriptors: Earth Science, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedSteinweg, Hilda – Library Resources and Technical Services, 1979
This examination of methods by which specificity is achieved in LC subject headings includes examples of the application of these methods in particular headings, and a brief discussion of problems of consistency and levels of specificity in LCSH. (Author/MBR)
Descriptors: Architecture, Children, Exhibits, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedWorthen, B. R. – Evaluation Practice, 1996
In 1991, Michael Scriven published "Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation," a reconsideration of the classic distinction in evaluation roles. Debate about the roles of evaluation continued in the four papers that follow this introduction, all of which were presented at a forum at the 1995 International Evaluation Conference. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Formative Evaluation, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedWholey, Joseph S. – Evaluation Practice, 1996
Performance measurement can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. Formative evaluation is typically more useful for government purposes whereas performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations of either formative or summative nature. Evaluators should study performance measurement through case studies and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Measurement Techniques, Performance Based Assessment

Direct link
