Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 18 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 117 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 296 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 782 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 130 |
| Teachers | 116 |
| Researchers | 20 |
| Students | 19 |
| Policymakers | 11 |
| Administrators | 6 |
| Media Staff | 6 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Community | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 46 |
| United States | 35 |
| Australia | 29 |
| Canada | 28 |
| China | 26 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 25 |
| Japan | 17 |
| California | 13 |
| South Africa | 12 |
| Ohio | 11 |
| Spain | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedColbert, Kent R. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1987
Focuses on the relationship between debate training and critical thinking ability, and examines whether Cross-Examination Debate Association (CEDA) debaters, National Debate Tournament (NDT) debaters, and nondebaters differ significantly on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Indicates no significant difference between NDT debaters and…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Critical Thinking, Debate, Higher Education
Peer reviewedLittlefield, Robert S. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1987
Explores the procedure of dropping the low rank/low rating that is used at some national forensic tournaments and finds that a significantly altered pool of contestants for elimination rounds is not produced. (MM)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedHanson, Colan T. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1987
Assesses whether a contestant's seed in an elimination round is a good indicator of the contestant's finish in that particular round, and finds limited support for concluding that seeding is a good indicator of final placement. (MM)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedHample, Dale – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1986
Argues that the unconscious mind plays a central role in argumentation. Discusses the nature of the unconscious and analyzes invention, focusing on rules theory. Claims that argument reception is controlled by the unconscious. Identifies a series of basic issues needing investigation. (JD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures, Communication Research, Debate
Peer reviewedShelton, Michael W. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1985
Addresses charges that have been raised against using the study counterplan in academic debate and in real-world decision making. Concludes that accumulating information enhances the basis of decision making, a basis that is utilized and ensured through the counterplan. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Decision Making, Higher Education, Information Seeking
Peer reviewedBoaz, John K. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1985
Includes transcript, editorial analysis, and judges' critiques of the final debate between students from the University of Iowa and Harvard University. (PD)
Descriptors: College Students, Debate, Federal Government, Higher Education
Peer reviewedUlrich, Walter – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1984
Discusses two points in response to the objections raised in the previous essay: (1) higher standards for argument are not justified and could create problems and (2) theoretical issues can and should be debated in individual debate rounds. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBecker, Carl B. – National Forensic Journal, 1983
The author, a Fulbright Lecturer at Osaka University, discusses debate in Japan and the Japanese value system with its deference to age and authority. (PD)
Descriptors: Cultural Context, Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Allen, Mike; Tollefson, Michael – 1998
This paper considers the ongoing debate between two organizations (National Association of Scholars and Teachers for a Democratic Culture) in higher education. The rhetorical positions of each side resemble those of the "cold war" between the United States and the Soviet Union of the 1950s and 1960s where each side created a mirror image…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Debate, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education
Thomson, Phillip – 1998
This paper examines the potential of sociohistorical theory for the study of academic debate. The essay describes sociohistorical theory (noting that it is most often attributed to the work of Lev Vygotsky and that contemporary scholars influenced by it include Jerome Bruner and James Wertsch), the relationship between reason and emotion from a…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Debate, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewedHollihan, Thomas A. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1983
Criticizes certain practices observed in academic debates which the author believes are produced by acceptance of the hypothesis-testing paradigm. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedHenderson, Bill; Boman, David L. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1983
Analyzed the consistency of debate judges' philosophy and ballot statements. Found that their debating philosophies accurately reflect the criteria they use to decide debates. (PD)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Content Analysis, Debate, Evaluation Criteria
Ficklen, Ellen – American School Board Journal, 1983
The National Education Association (NEA) remains opposed to merit pay plans in their official statements. But at the 1983 convention NEA approved New Business Item D, which leaves room for discussion and speculation whether NEA's stance is softening on the issue. (MD)
Descriptors: Debate, Elementary Secondary Education, Master Teachers, Merit Pay
Peer reviewedLemert, James B.; And Others – Communication Research--An International Quarterly, 1983
Studied the effects of the February 20, 1980, debate involving seven Republican candidates. Results strongly suggest that watching a televised debate early in the presidential primary season can increase respondents' interest in, and knowledge about, the campaign. (PD)
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication Research, Debate, Mass Media Effects
Peer reviewedLichtman, Allan J.; Rohrer, Daniel M. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Responds to Rowland's article, (CS 705 841). Contends that policy systems analysis emerges as the only acceptable paradigm for competitive debate and that it satisfies the criteria for paradigm evaluation. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Models


