Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 32 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 184 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 413 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 589 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 304 |
| Teachers | 149 |
| Researchers | 56 |
| Policymakers | 38 |
| Administrators | 31 |
| Students | 26 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Community | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Netherlands | 48 |
| Turkey | 33 |
| Australia | 23 |
| Florida | 17 |
| Canada | 14 |
| Spain | 13 |
| Norway | 12 |
| Sweden | 10 |
| California | 9 |
| Poland | 9 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 7 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Peer reviewedSmeets, Paul M.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1987
Evaluation of two methods, Stimulus Manipulation and Delay Feedback Only, for teaching four mildly handicapped students (ages 9-13) to solve missing minuend problems found both methods to be effective. However, systematic differences in error rate and long-term retention were observed, favoring the Stimulus Manipulation procedure. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Feedback, Instructional Effectiveness, Mathematical Applications
Peer reviewedReynolds, Maynard C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The article responds to previous articles about the regular education initiative and concludes that there is little evidence to justify present practices of student categorization of the mildly handicapped in special education and that the need for major reform is great. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Labeling (of Persons)
Peer reviewedWest, J. Frederick; Cannon, Glenna S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
Using a Delphi technique, a 100-member interdisciplinary, expert panel from 47 states identified 47 competencies in eight categories as essential to collaborative consultation between special and regular educators. Highest ratings were given to interactive communication, collaborative problem solving, and personal characteristics. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Competence, Consultation Programs, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedFranklin, Mary E.; And Others – Focus on Exceptional Children, 1987
The article explores evidence of the benefits and limitations of four instructional strategies (direct instruction, classroom management, cooperative grouping, and metacognition) on the successful integration of mildly handicapped children in the mainstream. (DB)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Cooperation, Elementary Secondary Education, Grouping (Instructional Purposes)
Peer reviewedEastman, Mary Kay; Safran, Joan S. – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1986
Instructions and illustrations support this discussion of learning activities designed to remediate deficiences and build skills in balance and/or motor skills for mildly handicapped students who may not have access to physical therapy or adaptive physical education. Appropriate for both regular and special classes, activities include arm…
Descriptors: Adapted Physical Education, Elementary Education, Mild Disabilities, Motor Development
McLaughlin, T. F.; And Others – Techniques, 1986
The effects of reducing the number of daily social studies homework questions to reward lower rates of inappropriate classroom behavior was investigated with 19 mildly handicapped junior high students and their two teachers. The intervention resulted in significant decreases in inappropriate behavior with no changes in homework accuracy or…
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Classroom Techniques, Homework, Incentives
Peer reviewedThorkildsen, Ron J.; Friedman, Susan G. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1986
The Beginning Sight Reading (BSR) program, an interactive videodisc approach compared the effects of extensive and minimal remediation and of rate of instruction on reading performance of 32 elementary students with academic difficulties. Both BSR programs were effective, but the more extensive remediation was more efficient. (CL)
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Elementary Education, Instructional Design, Microcomputers
Peer reviewedVinograd-Bausell, Carole R.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1986
The effectiveness of supplementary home tutoring with minimal professional guidance of 64 learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, or educable mentally retarded primary grade students was evaluated. Results indicated that after two weeks children whose parents had received the tutoring materials scored significantly higher on a word recognition…
Descriptors: Home Study, Mild Disabilities, Parent Role, Primary Education
Peer reviewedClark, Gary M.; White, Warren J. – Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 1985
Factors affecting the resources and service delivery in rural schools center on financial aspects (including high transportation costs and lower eligibility for vocational education funds) and human factors (such as smaller district size and lower population density and fewer and less varied occupational alternatives). Recommendations are offered…
Descriptors: Career Education, Delivery Systems, Demography, Financial Policy
Peer reviewedMarston, Douglas; Magnusson, Deanne – Exceptional Children, 1985
Two studies document benefits of implementing CBM (curriculum-based measurement) in both special and regular education settings. In Study 1 CBM is demonstrated to be a valid and reliable measurement system that aids teacher decisions regarding student placement, progress, and intervention effectiveness in an elementary school. Study II outlines…
Descriptors: Curriculum, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Mild Disabilities
Peer reviewedBeckman, Paula J. – Mental Retardation, 1984
To assess consistency between maternal and professional assessment of child performance, 31 mothers of disabled children (6-36 months old) participating in an intervention program completed measures of infant development, behavior, and characteristics. Maternal and staff assessments were found to be highly similar. Implications for programs are…
Descriptors: Infants, Informal Assessment, Intervention, Mild Disabilities
Peer reviewedColeman, J. Michael – Journal of Special Education, 1983
Three hypotheses adduced from social comparison theory were tested by assessing the self-concepts of 138 normal children, 138 mildly handicapped children in three special education settings (from partial to total segregation), and 46 children with academic difficulties in regular classes. (Author/MC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Mainstreaming, Mild Disabilities
Gersten, Russel M.; And Others – Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1982
Four studies compared static versus dynamic presentations of examples and nonexaples of the concepts "diagonal" and "conves," with nonhandicapped preschoolers, mildly handicapped primary students, and severely handicapped adults. Ss taught with a dynamic presentation learned the discrimination in significantly fewer trials, with performance either…
Descriptors: Adults, Discrimination Learning, Mild Disabilities, Primary Education
Peer reviewedGillet, Pamela – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1983
The purposes of elementary school career education for mildly handicapped students, and specific learning activities and materials, are discussed. Elementary level career education components are identified as the development of social skills, self-understanding, communication and computation abilities, and the exploration of a variety of careers.…
Descriptors: Career Education, Class Activities, Elementary Education, Mild Disabilities
Peer reviewedMorrison, Gale M. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1981
The social status of 40 mildly learning handicapped and 24 nonhandicapped students and their own perceptions of and their ideal preference for social status were investigated. (Author)
Descriptors: Mainstreaming, Mild Disabilities, Peer Acceptance, Self Concept


