NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1,186 to 1,200 of 2,363 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carliner, Saul – Technical Communication Quarterly, 2003
Notes that technical communicators have developed different methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness of their work, such as editing, usability testing, and determining the value added. Explains that at least three broad value systems underlie the assessment practices: characteristic-based, task-based, and results-based. Concludes that the…
Descriptors: Editing, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grant, Carl A.; Graue, Elizabeth – Review of Educational Research, 1997
The new editors of the "Review of Educational Research" recognize their charge to be comprehensive in the process of review of educational research and to be of service to educators. They also acknowledge the challenge to be nurtured by the scholarship of the times and innovations in education. (SLD)
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Educational Research, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Auman, Ann E.; Fee, Frank E., Jr.; Russial, John T. – Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 2002
Presents and discusses results of a survey of editing instructors in the United States on the status of copy editing. Provides benchmark data on the state of copy editing instruction in accredited colleges and universities. Concludes that copy editing is generally healthy and respected in most programs but that it mirrors the industry in taking a…
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Journalism Education, Program Validation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Kenneth L. – Communication Education, 2002
Describes personal reflections on "Communication Education" between 1976 and 1978 under the author's editorship. Discusses reflections under three headings: events and experiences shaping the editor's views of the field of communication education; the transition from "The Speech Teacher" to "Communication Education,"…
Descriptors: Change, Communication (Thought Transfer), Editing, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Irish, Peggy M.; Trigg, Randall H. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989
Discusses hypermedia as an appropriate medium for supporting collaborative work and describes hypermedia systems in general and NoteCards in particular. Experiences of collaborators working with NoteCards are presented, the resulting development of two tools is described, and future developments for NoteCards and these tools are discussed. (17…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Software, Cooperation, Discussion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kurke, Lance B.; And Others – Communication Research, 1989
Examines whether information lost or altered in a communication chain can be reversed. Concludes that within the boundary conditions of this experiment, information loss is reversible; that some losses are more reversible than others; and that people reconstruct orderly parts and omit details that confuse connections among the parts. (JAD)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Diffusion (Communication), Editing, Higher Education
Fyten, David – Currents, 1992
Suggestions are offered to campus editors on ways to make periodical article headlines more arresting. Stressed are the need for accuracy, appropriate length, use of poetics, and cleverness. Examples of good and poor headlines are offered and the need to devote adequate time to headline preparation is stressed. (DB)
Descriptors: Editing, Headlines, Higher Education, Material Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Piolat, Annie – Language and Education, 1991
After examining the related research, it is difficult to conclude with certainty that the use of word processors is always effective in improving writers' revising skills or that their use necessarily leads to the production of higher quality texts. Their effectiveness depends on other factors that psychologists are starting to measure. (110…
Descriptors: Editing, Foreign Countries, Quality Control, Word Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rude, Carolyn; Smith, Elizabeth – Technical Communication, 1992
Examines whether the computer is an effective editing tool. Reports that a survey of 94 editors shows that 62.8 percent use computers in editing, and even editors who use them also depend on hard copy. Finds that the computer seems to increase the editors' responsibilities, but it remains just a tool. (PRA)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Editing, Editors, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tharp, Marty; Zimmerman, Don – Technical Communication Quarterly, 1992
Reports students' perceptions of learning desktop publishing (DTP) systems. Finds that (1) students learned the foundations of DTP in under 60 hours of hands-on experience; (2) the incremental introduction of DTP functions and practice sessions before assignments were the most effective teaching strategy; and (3) use of DTP encouraged nonartistic…
Descriptors: Desktop Publishing, Editing, Higher Education, Student Attitudes
Von Diether, Barbara – Training, 1992
Improvement of writing in the workplace involves both writers and their managers in a systematic process: (1) prepackaging the assignment; (2) delegating; (3) clarifying and focusing the assignment; (4) promoting efficient writing techniques; (5) efficient editing and/or peer reviewing; and (6) reviewing the final document. (SK)
Descriptors: Editing, Management Development, Revision (Written Composition), Supervisors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1993
Suggests that editors looking for work can approach companies with some unsolicited editing of the company's own annual report. Suggest what to look for when editing an annual report. (SR)
Descriptors: Annual Reports, Editing, Employment Opportunities, Job Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gerich, Carol – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Describes revision as practiced at a major scientific research and development laboratory. Shows how scientific authors, technical editors, colleague reviewers, and supervisors team up in a collaborative approach in which editors provide substantive revisions early in the collaborative review process. Argues that editors should become involved at…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Editing, Editors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Argues that the best approach for technical editors is to abandon the language cops' billy club, listen to what the authors want to say, and give those authors friendly expertise, without rigid prescription or blanket condemnation. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Grammar, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walters, Timothy N.; And Others – Public Relations Review, 1994
Compares the grammatical structure of original press releases with the resultant placements in daily newspapers. Finds that, in their use of press releases, journalists almost always have to make them simpler, shorter, easier to read, and less passive. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Newspapers, Public Relations
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  76  |  77  |  78  |  79  |  80  |  81  |  82  |  83  |  84  |  ...  |  158