Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1634 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4078 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 571 |
| Teachers | 358 |
| Researchers | 135 |
| Administrators | 119 |
| Students | 51 |
| Policymakers | 46 |
| Counselors | 31 |
| Community | 24 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 207 |
| Canada | 190 |
| United Kingdom | 163 |
| United States | 117 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 106 |
| California | 97 |
| Netherlands | 76 |
| China | 69 |
| Sweden | 68 |
| Taiwan | 65 |
| Israel | 64 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Goodwill, Janet V.; Hulbert, Kathleen – 1992
The significance/importance of relationships and connection of women in working through emotional distress and building personal empowerment is illustrated in the process model. The group process model of empowerment draws from both the current theories of women's psychological development and social interaction theory in illustrating the process…
Descriptors: Females, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Groups
Eitington, Julius E. – Training Develop J, 1969
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Management Development, Participation, Sensitivity Training
Yukl, Gary – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Behavior, Group Dynamics, Leadership, Questionnaires
Graesser, Cheryl C. – 1980
Most of the research on bargaining has focused on individuals bargaining against other individuals. This paper discusses two experiments in which the bargaining processes and outcomes of bargaining teams were compared to those of individual bargainers. Individuals bargained against a single other in the first experiment, while a two-person team…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Graphs, Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics
Owen, Steven V.; And Others – 1973
The purpose was to determine the effect of group size on both the total and the average per person fluency, flexibility, and originality of responses to problem solving tasks. One hundred sixty-three college juniors and seniors were assigned at random to groups of one, three, six, or twelve members. All groups were given identical instructions to…
Descriptors: Creativity, Group Dynamics, Instruction, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedEagly, Alice H. – Psychological Bulletin, 1978
Examines the hypothesis that women are more easily influenced than men by reviewing the literature on persuasion and conformity research. Persuasion research and conformity studies not involving group pressure show scant empirical support for sex differences. For group pressure conformity research, a substantial minority of studies support the…
Descriptors: Conformity, Group Dynamics, Literature Reviews, Sex Differences
Peer reviewedSmart, Carolyne; Vertinsky, Ilan – Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977
This paper develops a conceptual model of the crisis-decision process, focusing on links susceptible to emergence of pathologies, and proposes preventive measures to increase the coping abilities of decision units. (Author)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Models, Organizations (Groups)
Peer reviewedRapoport, Amnon; Bornstein, Gary – Psychological Review, 1987
An experimental paradigm is proposed for investigating interpersonal conflicts under conditions of intergroup competition. Two alternative models are proposed and their testable implications are derived and discussed. The effects of predecisional communication are examined and several extensions of the basic paradigm are outlined. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Competition, Group Dynamics, Mathematical Models, Social Psychology
Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective.
Peer reviewedHirokawa, Randy Y. – Human Communication Research, 1988
Discusses three studies stemming from an investigation designed to demonstrate that group decision-making performance is contingent on the satisfaction of four functional requirements. Claims the studies provide further support for the functional perspective. (JAD)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Group Dynamics, Participative Decision Making
Peer reviewedDies, Robert R. – Small Group Behavior, 1985
This elaboration and critique is the final article in a four-part series that presents the empirical foundation, parameters, and applications of a multidimensional model for organizing research on group psychotherapeutic process. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Models, Research Design
Peer reviewedKimberly, James C. – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Reviews Bale's view on relations between instrumental and expressive structures and ensuing work on legitimacy of instrumental structure. Conceptualizes this legitimacy in terms of integration of distribution of members' skills and instrumental structure. Discusses Bale's conception of primary and secondary differentiation and inequality…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Justice, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewedGreenway, Jennifer Diane; Greenway, Philip – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Illustrates the major dimensions of small group members' interpersonal perceptions using the repertory grid technique. Elicited dimensions in the initial and middle stages in a therapeutic and comparison group. Related a variant of the accepting-rejecting dimension to independently derived personality measures. Contrasts results for the two…
Descriptors: Adults, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Rejection (Psychology)
Peer reviewedSaltmarsh, Robert E.; And Others – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1986
Describes a practical conceptualization of group process and management, titled the TRAC model (tasking, relating, acquiring, contacting), which takes into consideration the changing nature of group life. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Models
Peer reviewedFuhriman, Addie; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Presents problems associated with process analysis with a specific focus on definitional and methodological concerns. Discusses the need for a comprehensive system that will help researchers to separate and comprehend the individual parts of a group and their relationship to the whole group. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedSigman, Stuart J. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Describes selected rules that may be abstracted from discussions in a given natural group, in this case, a nursing home admissions board. Suggested that to comprehend group structure, investigators must move beyond the internal units of conversation and consider conversational behavior in the larger context of an ethnographic present. (LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Communication


