Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 296 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1912 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4914 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 8060 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Stansfield, Charles W. | 45 |
| Shohamy, Elana | 32 |
| Garcia Laborda, Jesus | 26 |
| McNamara, Tim | 26 |
| Cheng, Liying | 25 |
| Alderson, J. Charles | 24 |
| Bachman, Lyle F. | 24 |
| Webb, Stuart | 24 |
| Al-Jarf, Reima | 21 |
| Perkins, Kyle | 21 |
| Coniam, David | 20 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 403 |
| Teachers | 314 |
| Researchers | 107 |
| Administrators | 65 |
| Students | 38 |
| Policymakers | 22 |
| Counselors | 8 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Iran | 677 |
| China | 501 |
| Japan | 394 |
| Turkey | 284 |
| Canada | 257 |
| Australia | 230 |
| Taiwan | 200 |
| United Kingdom | 187 |
| South Korea | 177 |
| Thailand | 172 |
| Spain | 153 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 7 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 9 |
| Does not meet standards | 12 |
Peer reviewedMagnan, Sally Sieloff – Canadian Modern Language Review, 1987
Differences between the academic (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) and government (Foreign Service Institute) versions of the oral proficiency interview test are examined, and data from two studies of interrater reliability are presented and discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Interrater Reliability, Language Proficiency, Language Tests
Abkarian, G. G. – Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 1986
Eighty unimpaired adults took the iconic-symbolic (I-S) subtest of the Muma Assessment Program under traditional protocols and revised instructions like those used in classic studies of classification ability. Only 18 functioned at the symbolic level as defined by the protocols; revised instructions more frequently evoked the expected symbolic…
Descriptors: Adults, Classification, Cognitive Development, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewedTraynor, Raymond – ELT Journal, 1985
Contends that the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) has some very serious defects. First, it does not test either the ability to speak or to write English. Second, it has strong cultural biases. Third, a relatively large number of right answers can be obtained by guesswork. (SED)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Evaluation, Language Proficiency, Language Tests
Peer reviewedBeisler, Jean Madsen; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1987
The study examined the performance of 19 pairs of autistic and nonautistic (but with a language delay of at least six months) children on the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. Results indicated no significant differences between groups or between sexes within groups in receptive language skills. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Autism, Cognitive Processes, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewedClifford, Ray – Unterrichtspraxis, 1988
The prevalent use of closed instructional systems has led both teachers and students to an increasingly narrow view of language learning. Given the infinite nature of language and the finite nature of curriculum and tests, only open instructional systems allow an assessment of whether original instructional objectives were met. (MSE)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Comparative Analysis, Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Objectives
Ghadessy, Mohsen – IRAL, 1988
A test of paralinguistic features of English that can be observed by listening is recommended for testing listening comprehension, especially at the advanced level, in students of English as a second language. (MSE)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, English (Second Language), Language Tests, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewedNevo, David; Shohamy, Elana – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1986
This study tested the validity and applicability of the Standards for Evaluation of Education Programs, Projects and Materials (Joint Committee, 1981) by applying them to four alternative methods of testing oral proficiency in English as a Foreign Language. (BS)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, High Schools
Peer reviewedBachman, Lyle; Savignon, Sandra J. – Modern Language Journal, 1986
Current ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) Oral Language Proficiency Guidelines are based on an overly narrow view of communicative language proficiency. However, the guidelines do provide a basis for the development of effective teaching and testing methods. (CB)
Descriptors: Communicative Competence (Languages), Evaluation Problems, Higher Education, Interviews
Peer reviewedKaplan, Isabelle M. – Foreign Language Annals, 1984
Examines the impact of the workshop in oral proficiency testing organized by the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages and the Illinois Foreign Language Teachers Association. The workshops were designed to train college professors to administer oral interviews to rate the level of oral proficiency of foreign language speakers. (SED)
Descriptors: Conversational Language Courses, Curriculum Development, Language Tests, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedMitchell, Rosamond – British Journal of Language Teaching, 1985
Discusses the suggestion that certain features of "real life" language use must be incorporated in any assessment of a foreign language learner's communicative competence. The validity of current assessment schemes, such as role play tasks, is discussed, and a case study of a role play testing situation is reported. (SED)
Descriptors: Communicative Competence (Languages), Discourse Analysis, Interviews, Language Tests
Peer reviewedBrown, James W. – Foreign Language Annals, 1985
Describes the "RSVP" pilot program which uses an oral interview procedure adapted from the ACTFL/ETS Oral Interview. This procedure, which was modified for use in the classroom, is easily administered with a forced mode scale reflecting a descending hierarchy among the four skills tested: response, structure, vocabulary, and pronunciation. (SED)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Communicative Competence (Languages), Higher Education, Interviews
Peer reviewedWitton, Niclas – Babel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations, 1984
Classifies several kinds of readily available foreign language computer programs. Most of the programs fall into either game/activity or testing categories. In all the programs, feedback to the student who has made an error is limited. Sees the computer as a specific information resource in self-directed learning programs. (SED)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Educational Games, Evaluation
Peer reviewedStansfield, Charles – System, 1976
A brief summary of this conference, focussing on foreign and second language testing, is given. Topics covered include: publishers' tests, semantic aspects of error analysis, factor analysis and language proficiency, learning style identification, the foreign language placement test of the U.S.A.F. Academy, assessment of language dominance, and…
Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), Error Patterns, Factor Analysis, Language Instruction
Peer reviewedConley, Janet E. – American Annals of the Deaf, 1976
Descriptors: Deafness, Exceptional Child Research, Hearing Impairments, Idioms
Peer reviewedStedje, Astrid – Zielsprache Deutsch, 1976
Tests given at the German Institute of the University of Stockholm to 32 Finnish students studying German revealed that both their native language and their Swedish interfered with their learning German, in about equal degree overall. The mother tongue, Finnish, caused more interference errors in pronunciation. (Text is in German.) (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: College Students, Finnish, German, Higher Education


