Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 68 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 174 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 220 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 749 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 57 |
| Practitioners | 24 |
| Teachers | 16 |
| Counselors | 3 |
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Administrators | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Community | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| United States | 69 |
| Canada | 46 |
| Australia | 38 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 29 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| China | 22 |
| Israel | 20 |
| Texas | 20 |
| California | 19 |
| Germany | 18 |
| New York | 15 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 17 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 8 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 3 |
| Race to the Top | 2 |
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Supplemental Nutrition… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedPowers, Stephen; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
The predictive validity of the California Achievement Test, Reading (CAT-R) was examined for 480 Hispanic and Anglo pupils in Grades 2 and 3. The validity of the CAT-R as a predictor for reading for combined groups of Hispanic and Anglo pupils appeared to be limited. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Anglo Americans, Comparative Testing, Hispanic Americans
Peer reviewedMacLeod, Colin M.; And Others – Intelligence, 1986
Field dependence and spatial ability are examined as different labels for a common underlying dimension. Sixty college students completed two tests of field dependence and two tests of spatial ability. Results of an analysis of covariance found no evidence to view the two traits as distinct from each other. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Field Dependence Independence
Peer reviewedWahlstrom, Merlin; And Others – Canadian Journal of Education, 1986
An important aspect of Ontario's participation in the Second International Study of Mathematics was a comparative analysis of students' mathematics achievement from 1968 to 1982. Achievement levels remained remarkably constant. The problem of declining achievement in the United States was not apparent in this analysis of Ontario students. (LMO)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Difficulty Level, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedGarrison, Wayne M.; Baumgarten, Bruce S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
A computerized adaptive testing procedure for measuring mathematical skills of 60 deaf college students was evaluated. Ability estimates were compared for stability to those obtained earlier from conventional testing. Adaptive testing increased measurement efficiency by reducing test length. Student attitudes toward computerized testing were…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewedPerry, Cheryl L.; And Others – Adolescence, 1983
Compared the effectiveness of a social consequence curriculum to health effects curriculums in a high school smoking prevention program. Results showed none of the programs was significantly more successful in reducing smoking onset or encouraging cessation. Teacher-taught programs were as effective as those taught by college students. (JAC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Health Education, High School Students, High Schools
Kaltsounis, Bill – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Creative Thinking, Deafness
Urbina, Susana; And Others – Psychol Rep, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Creativity, Cultural Influences, Femininity
Peer reviewedGeddes, Dolores – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
Descriptors: Child Development, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedJoesting, Joan; Joesting, Robert – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewedJoesting, Joan; Joesting, Robert – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Intellectual Development
Peer reviewedMorf, Martin E.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Arousal Patterns, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewedTsai, Loh Seng; Haines, Richard B. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, College Students, Comparative Testing, Graduate Students
Peer reviewedWhitacre, Janet D.; And Others – Language and Speech, 1970
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Child Development, Comparative Testing, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewedFroese, Victor – Reading Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Learning Processes
Peer reviewedAberman, Hugh M.; Chansky, Norman – Psychological Reports, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Education Majors, Factor Analysis, Graduate Students


