NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1361667
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2022
Pages: 6
Abstractor: ERIC
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0009-1383
EISSN: EISSN-1939-9146
Available Date: N/A
Can Collective Bargaining Be Improved?
Julius, Daniel J.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, v54 n5 p31-36 2022
Collective bargaining in postsecondary institutions is a complex phenomenon. Many observers believe collective bargaining is inherently a conservative process designed to preserve the status quo, one that rarely encourages change or innovation. The reality is that the two parties often face different pressures and have dichotomous interests and outlooks on key issues. In university settings, the situation is further complicated as labor management processes often do not include all institutional constituencies, precluding their ability to shape or influence bargaining outcomes. This article provides recommendations for how universities might become more responsive to faculty, staff, and students through collective bargaining, and, more specifically, how labor relations processes can be managed in ways that are more beneficial for all parties.
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A