Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 63 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 329 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 827 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1777 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 86 |
| Practitioners | 63 |
| Administrators | 34 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 23 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 64 |
| United Kingdom | 59 |
| Canada | 54 |
| China | 40 |
| United States | 39 |
| California | 37 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 36 |
| Texas | 32 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| Japan | 26 |
| Israel | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs
Alkin, Marvin C.; Coyle, Karin – 1988
The misuse of evaluation is discussed. Boundaries of misutilization are not well understood, and distinctions between misutilization and non-use or abuse are not clear. In general, the responsibility for evaluation misuse is with the user, while the responsibility for misevaluation is with the evaluator. A distinction is also needed between…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Metz, Mary Haywood – 1981
Ethnographic methods can be a valuable supplement to our understanding of the limits and possibilities of social science research by addressing the question of subjectivity directly. When ethnographers enter a social situation, they explain themselves and participants see them primarily in the role of fieldworker. But field researchers also have…
Descriptors: Ethnography, Evaluators, Research Problems, Researchers
Wachtman, Edward L. – 1978
The author presents his opinion that educational evaluation has much similarity to the nonfiction narrative, (defined as a series of events ordered in time), particularly as it relates a current situation to future possibilities. He refers to Stake's statement that evaluation is concerned not only with outcomes but also with antecedents and with…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Narration
Cornett, Joe D.; Krajewski, Robert J. – American School Board Journal, 1978
Provides ten suggestions to help in choosing and using an outside evaluator. (IRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluators, Personnel Selection, Selection
Peer reviewedCarlson, Robert V. – Educational Planning, 1977
Discusses how one ensures a high degree of unbiased research and subsequent utilization in environmental contexts that are often described as competitive, self-serving, and survival-oriented. The causes of political problems and their dimensions are discussed along with strategies for minimizing them. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Administrators, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewedSmith, Nick L. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1985
An incident from evaluation practice is examined to aid understanding of moral problems in evaluation. Six characteristics are identified and discussed. Types of research needed on the moral aspects of evaluation practice are presented. Suggestions for aiding evaluators in dealing with moral problems are outlined. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluators, Moral Issues
Peer reviewedJerrell, S. Lee; Jerrell, Jeanette M. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1985
Some of the major moral and ethical dilemmas illustrated by authors in this special journal issue are highlighted. From an ethical viewpoint, the complexity of evaluation activities is likened to "quicksand" terrain in which directional or warning signs should be erected to aid personal choices when such issues are encountered.…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluators, Moral Issues, Moral Values
Peer reviewedNapier, Nancy K.; Latham, Gary P. – Personnel Psychology, 1986
Examined outcome expectancies of people who conduct appraisals. Interviews with 32 appraisers in the newsprint industry showed that appraisers perceived no consequences to them of conducting appraisals. Questionnaires completed by 39 appraisers in the banking industry provided moderate support for alternate hypothesis that appraisers perceive…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Negative Attitudes, Personnel Evaluation, Research Methodology
Russon, Craig – 2003
This paper reviews some of the literature related to evaluator certification programs and expresses a concern over the unilateral implementation of such a program by an evaluation organization like the American Evaluation Association. Such a move could lower the economic incentives that evaluators from developing countries would have to join their…
Descriptors: Certification, Evaluation, Evaluators, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewedDeniston, O. Lynn – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1980
Program evaluation must be practiced by all members of all trades, disciplines, professions, or any other group of people whose efforts are aimed at making a difference. There is a role for "content free" evaluation methodology resources, but not for a professional "content free" evaluator. (RL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Role Perception
Peer reviewedSmith, Robert M. – Lifelong Learning: The Adult Years, 1981
The author provides a checklist of questions for directors of programs undergoing external evaluation, concerning the evaluation effort (purpose, focus, criteria, outcome) and the evaluators (selection, experience, approach, meta-evaluation). (SK)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Evaluators, Program Administration, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWilson, James W. – Journal of Cooperative Education, 1980
Proposes an ethical principle to guide evaluators of cooperative education programs: that all actions of the evaluator contribute to a competent, fair, and useful assessment. Applies this principle to each element of the evaluation process. (SK)
Descriptors: Cooperative Education, Ethics, Evaluators, Objectivity
Peer reviewedChristie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Studied the self-reported evaluation practices of eight evaluation theorists and the real-world practices of 138 program evaluators. Derived a comparative framework to illustrate the similarities and differences among the eight theories as they are applied. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluators, Self Report, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewedFetterman, David – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Discusses the concept of process use as an important distinction between the evaluation theories of E. House and D. Fetterman, thus helping to explain the discordant results of C. Christie for these two theories. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Theories, Theory Practice Relationship

Direct link
