Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 63 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 329 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 827 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1777 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 86 |
| Practitioners | 63 |
| Administrators | 34 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 23 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 64 |
| United Kingdom | 59 |
| Canada | 54 |
| China | 40 |
| United States | 39 |
| California | 37 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 36 |
| Texas | 32 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| Japan | 26 |
| Israel | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKilburg, Richard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1980
The philosophical and psychological foundations of the resistance evaluators encounter when attempting to implement evaluation efforts are explored. Problems in the evaluative paradigm are presented, and suggested coping strategies are discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluators, Experimenter Characteristics, Human Services
Peer reviewedHouse, Ernest R.; Care, Norman S. – Educational Theory, 1979
Twelve conditions which must be satisfied for an evaluation agreement to be fair are posited and discussed, and conditions which would render void a fair agreement are examined. (MJB)
Descriptors: Contracts, Educational Philosophy, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedLewis, Joseph H. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Administering research and overseeing evaluation researchers make evident the role of attitudes and outlook in comparison to technical skill. The latter is important for evaluators. Evaluation research can be considered to have been originated in operations research. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Administration, Evaluators, Interprofessional Relationship, Operations Research
Peer reviewedFienberg, Stephen E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
Successful evaluation research reouires a high level of quantitative skill. The procedures, diverse and complex, of good quantitative training are outlined. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Curriculum, Evaluators, Professional Training
Peer reviewedGlasman, Naftaly S.; Bilazewski, Bodo F. – Journal of Educational Administration and History, 1979
Examines the opinions of administrators/evaluators on the usefulness of relatively recent books on educational evaluation. (IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrators, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluators
Peer reviewedLinacre, John M.; Wright, Benjamin D. – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2002
Describes an extension to the Rasch model for fundamental measurement in which there is parameterization not only for examinee ability and item difficulty but also for judge severity. Discusses variants of this model and judging plans, and explains its use in an empirical testing situation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Difficulty Level, Evaluators, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedRenger, Ralph; Passons, Omar; Cimetta, Adriana – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Describes the challenges faced by researchers in evaluating a neighborhood revitalization project. Places the challenges in the context of three of the Program Evaluation Standards of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation: Values Identification, Fiscal Responsibility, and Analysis of Quantitative Information. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators, Neighborhood Improvement
Peer reviewedHood, Stafford – New Directions for Evaluation, 2001
Provides a historical accounting of the work of early African American educational evaluators to show the critical place of race and culture in both historical and contemporary visions of responsive evaluation. Discusses reasons their work has so largely been ignored. (SLD)
Descriptors: Blacks, Culture, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol H. – Evaluation Practice, 1988
The role of the evaluator in the decision-making process is discussed. Topics covered include identification of decision makers and decision-making processes, delineation of informational needs, identification of the various media and forums for evaluation ideas, and definition of functions that evaluators serve. (TJH)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluators, Media Selection, Needs Assessment
Smith, M. F. – Evaluation Utilization, 1988
Different dimensions of evaluation utilization and evaluator strategies for stimulating use are discussed, in terms of designing a formal evaluation utilization system. While the need exists to improve the design process, there is no simple formula. Evaluators should see part of their function as creating a repository of knowledge. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewedBryant, Miles; Currin, DeAnn – Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1995
Investigates how six novice and six expert evaluators observed a teaching performance and subsequently interpreted their observations. Expert evaluators approached evaluation as a shared process of construction, analysis, and interpretation of classroom events. Experts looked for structures but were neither as prescriptive nor as judgmental as…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluators
Peer reviewedShadish, William R., Ed.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1995
The 12 articles (including an index) of this theme issue are devoted to documenting and critiquing the American Evaluation Association's "Guiding Principles for Evaluators," a code of ethics and standards. The development of these principles is traced, and their strengths and weaknesses are analyzed at general and specific levels. (SLD)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Moral Values
Peer reviewedTanji, Joy M. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1993
Evaluators vary in their propensity to make direct valuative judgments of program worth. The decision to include recommendations with a report or provide merely descriptive evaluation depends on individuals' perspectives concerning the nature of reality, truth and values, human agency, and informational utility. (SLD)
Descriptors: Beliefs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Guidelines
Peer reviewedMarsh, Herbert W.; Bazeley, Patricia – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1999
Evaluated external assessor ratings of the quality of the research team and the proposed research for proposals submitted to the Australian Research Council large grants program. Data from 313 evaluations show that the reliability of the assessments varied systematically with the number of assessors and the score considered. Discusses implication…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Grants
Peer reviewedMorris, Michael; Posavac, Emil; Russ-Eft, Darlene – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
The article and commentary in this special section consider the ethical implications of a remark by an employee in a business being evaluated that employees have been advised to make the program look good. Explores the implications for the evaluation and its usefulness. (SLD)
Descriptors: Employees, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems


