Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 63 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 329 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 827 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1777 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 86 |
| Practitioners | 63 |
| Administrators | 34 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 23 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 64 |
| United Kingdom | 59 |
| Canada | 54 |
| China | 40 |
| United States | 39 |
| California | 37 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 36 |
| Texas | 32 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| Japan | 26 |
| Israel | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStufflebeam, Daniel L. – Evaluation Practice, 1994
Serious issues in empowerment evaluation are articulated to help ensure that this enthusiastically presented concept will not mislead evaluators and result in lowering the field's professional standards. Analysis and recommendations are provided for the adoption, development, and implementation of an objectivist evaluation that conforms to…
Descriptors: Definitions, Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewedAltschuld, James W.; Zheng, Henry Y. – Evaluation Review, 1995
Key issues in evaluating the effectiveness of research organizations are examined, and the following approaches for evaluation are explored: (1) the goal-attainment approach, (2) the strategic constituency approach, (3) a systems approach, and (4) a competing values framework. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Objectives
Peer reviewedKirkhart, Karen E. – Evaluation Practice, 1995
The construct "multicultural validity" is proposed as the vehicle for organizing concerns about pluralism and diversity in evaluation and as a way to reflect on the cultural boundness of evaluation. It should be conceptualized as a central dimension of validity and a viable focus of concern in evaluation theory. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cultural Awareness, Cultural Pluralism, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedGrob, George – Evaluation Practice, 1992
How policy is developed and how evaluators can participate in the process are discussed, focusing on federal evaluators. The strongest weapon of an evaluator is a short, easy-to-read report with a simple, compelling message. Federal policy evaluators must learn to be content with slow gains. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Federal Government, Government Role
Peer reviewedNowack, Kenneth M. – Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1992
Comparison of self- and others' ratings of 335 managers' job performance found moderately low agreement between the two. Managers consistently reported practicing specific skills more frequently than raters' feedback showed, across 20 management practices areas. (SK)
Descriptors: Congruence (Psychology), Evaluators, Feedback, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedFagot, Robert F. – Psychometrika, 1994
A previous paper proposed a generalized family of coefficients of relational agreement for multiple judges. It focused on the concept of empirically meaningful relationships. This paper presents an ordinal coefficient of relational agreement as a special case of the generalized family. The proposed ordinal coefficient encompasses other ordinal…
Descriptors: Correlation, Effect Size, Equations (Mathematics), Evaluators
Peer reviewedMorell, Jonathan A. – Evaluation Practice, 1992
The author recounts how certain things have remained constant even though his work focus had changed from a concentration on human services and substance abuse to evaluating the impact of computer networks. Balancing the requirements of good methodology with the needs of decision makers remains central. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Human Services
Peer reviewedDuffy, Barbara Poitras – Evaluation Practice, 1993
The use of focus groups by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a tool of internal evaluation is described. Focus groups are used in an environment where credibility is key to achieving meaningful cooperation. Issues for consideration by other evaluators interested in the approach are summarized. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Federal Government
Peer reviewedLincoln, Yvonna Seossions – Evaluation Practice, 1991
The various arts and sciences that comprise the field of program evaluation are discussed. It is argued that emphasis on rigor and expressive content has left other aspects of evaluation unexplored. Educational evaluators need to consider what programs mean and how they contribute to understanding. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedFagan, William T. – Journal of Educational Thought/Revue de la Pensee Educative, 1990
Reports on a study of the peer review process in faculty publishing, in which 1,214 review comments by 216 reviewers were analyzed to determine the nature of the reviews and the reviewers. Categorizes reviews in terms of tone, direction, and focus. Delineates 4 reviewer profiles: critic, conciliator, competitor, and procrastinator. (DMM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Research, Evaluators, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewedNewman, Dianna L. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Addresses issues pertaining to the transmittal of common ethical values related to the practice of evaluation. The issues include the need for development and adoption of a common core of knowledge of ethics in evaluation, the need to provide this knowledge to all evaluation participants, and the need for multiple methods of instruction and…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewedTorres, Rosalie T.; Stone, Sharon Padilla; Butkus, Deborah L.; Hook, Barbara B.; Casey, Jill; Arens, Sheila A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Uses the evaluation of a family literacy program as the basis for an analysis of the benefits of collaborative evaluation. Identifies enhanced learning, efficient data collection and problem planning, deepened professional and personal relationships, and strengthened convictions as results of the collaboration. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Data Collection, Democracy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHouse, Ernest R.; Howe, Kenneth R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1998
Chelimsky, former head of the Program Evaluation and Methodology Division of the General Accounting Office, suggested that advocacy by evaluators destroys their credibility. Evaluators should, this author argues, be advocates for democracy and the public interest, with the question being how explicitly and how defensibly. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Credibility, Democracy, Ethics
Peer reviewedHess, Brian – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Illustrates the use of latent growth modeling (LGM) as an analytical tool in program evaluation using the hypothetical example of a high school drug prevention program. Demonstrates the use of LGM in assessing longitudinal impact and in incorporating predictors of status and growth into a model. Highlights advantages and limitations of LGM. (SLD)
Descriptors: Drug Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, High Schools
Peer reviewedSchwandt, Thomas A., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1998
The five chapters of this special issue provide insights into how Scandinavians understand evaluation practice. Although there is no "Scandinavian" perspective on evaluation, theory and practice in the Scandinavian countries unfold against sociocultural and intellectual influences that differ from those of the United States. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Foreign Countries


