Publication Date
| In 2026 | 11 |
| Since 2025 | 2873 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 7741 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 11607 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 16937 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 639 |
| Practitioners | 606 |
| Teachers | 553 |
| Administrators | 154 |
| Policymakers | 125 |
| Students | 102 |
| Parents | 64 |
| Counselors | 36 |
| Media Staff | 16 |
| Support Staff | 13 |
| Community | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| China | 620 |
| Turkey | 485 |
| Canada | 410 |
| Australia | 386 |
| United Kingdom | 355 |
| United States | 338 |
| Germany | 274 |
| Spain | 249 |
| India | 244 |
| Netherlands | 240 |
| California | 206 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 16 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 20 |
| Does not meet standards | 16 |
Peer reviewedWright, Lisa – Roeper Review, 1990
Twenty-six precocious preschoolers exhibited high frequencies of dramatic and associative play. Girls engaged in more cooperative and less solitary play than boys. Elder children participated in more solitary, parallel, and less cooperative and less dramatic play than younger peers. The higher intelligence quotient group undertook less…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cooperation, Dramatic Play, Gifted
Peer reviewedRispens, Jan; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1991
Two classification procedures for identifying children with reading disabilities were compared, differing in their use of intelligence quotient (IQ). Results indicated that abandoning IQ in classification had a very limited impact on the number of children identified as reading disordered, but that use of IQ resulted in more high-IQ children being…
Descriptors: Classification, Definitions, Elementary Education, Eligibility
Bolanos, Patricia J. – School Administrator, 1994
Ten years ago, founders of the Key School, in Indianapolis, Indiana, studied Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and applied it to curricula for gifted and talented students. Present school benefits wide range of students and boasts seven classroom generalists and numerous full-time specialists. The model stresses all seven…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Apprenticeships, Cognitive Style, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewedReed, T. Edward; Jensen, Arthur R. – Intelligence, 1993
Data are presented on body weight and cranial capacity for 211 young adult male Caucasians (postsecondary students). The data do not support Rushton's claim for a greater weight-adjusted cranial capacity of Mongoloid males. Speed and efficiency of cortical information processing may be more important for intelligence than brain size. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Body Weight, Cognitive Processes, College Students
Peer reviewedPrewett, Peter N.; McCaffery, Lucy K. – Psychology in the Schools, 1993
Examined relationship between Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT), Stanford-Binet, two-subtests short form, and Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA) with population of 75 academically referred students. K-BIT correlated significantly with Stanford-Binet and K-TEA Math, Reading, and Spelling scores. Results support use of K-BIT as…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Screening Tests
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1998
Argues that the cognitive mechanisms in human creativity are, for the most part, sighted rather than blind. Reviews attempts to apply evolutionary ideas to psychology and argues that these ideas do not apply to the psychology of human creativity. An alternative sighted-variation framework is then proposed. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Creative Development, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewedDelisle, James – Gifted Child Today Magazine, 1998
Discusses the trend toward identifying all children as gifted and the stripping of quality from gifted-child education. Argues that well-intentioned efforts to reform schools by introducing gifted-child education strategies for all students have watered down the offerings for many of the most gifted students. (CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Educational Quality, Educational Trends, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSchroeder-Davis, Stephen J. – Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 1999
Analysis of the essays of 3,514 Minnesota secondary students indicated that the majority (53.8%) would choose to be the smartest student in their class rather than the best-looking or the most athletic. Content analysis data, however, suggested significant awareness of an anti-intellectual stigma advanced by peers. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Anti Intellectualism, Gifted, Intelligence Differences, Peer Acceptance
Peer reviewedWagner, Richard K. – American Psychologist, 1997
Discusses issues of validity and fairness in the use of intelligence tests for job selection. Expands set of constructs used to predict job performance and sets of performance criteria used to quantify job performance. Presents an agenda for research and practice in job selection and training for the future. (MMU)
Descriptors: Employment, Intelligence Tests, Job Performance, Job Training
Peer reviewedMackinson, Jo Ann; Leigh, Irene W.; Blennerhassett, Lynne; Anthony, Susan – American Annals of the Deaf, 1997
A study involving 27 elementary children with hearing impairments indicated positive, moderate correlation between the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, 2nd edition, (TONI-2) IQ, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd edition, Performance IQ that supported concurrent validity. The TONI-2 had predictive value for Stanford Achievement…
Descriptors: Deafness, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewedGagne, Francoys – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Presents a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. The statements are grouped into three sections: the nature of human abilities, individual differences and their origins, and the specific case of gifts and talents. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBorland, James H. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the previous article, which proposed a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Takes issue with the distinction made between natural abilities and systematically developed abilities, and thus the distinction between giftedness and talent. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedDetterman, Douglas K.; Ruthsatz, Joanne – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the initial article in this issue that proposes a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Suggests a more comprehensive theory of elite performance composed of three components: general intelligence, domain-specific skills, and practice. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedHany, Ernst A. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
Responds to the initial article in this issue that proposes a set of 22 statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents. Argues that a comprehensive rationale is missing, particularly an explanation of developmental mechanisms, of learning processes, and of the dynamics of gene/environment interaction. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedGagne, Francoys – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1999
This rejoinder to articles responding to a set of 22 sequentially structured statements on the nature and origin of human abilities, gifts, and talents presented in this issue's initial article, defends the validity and usefulness of the distinction between high natural abilities (gifts) and high systematically developed ones (talents) as compared…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Definitions, Evaluation Criteria


