Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 63 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 329 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 827 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1777 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 86 |
| Practitioners | 63 |
| Administrators | 34 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 23 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 64 |
| United Kingdom | 59 |
| Canada | 54 |
| China | 40 |
| United States | 39 |
| California | 37 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 36 |
| Texas | 32 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| Japan | 26 |
| Israel | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedTornatzky, Louis G.; Johnson, Elmima C. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1982
In view of social processes, politics and the logistics of conducting evaluations, several implicit assumptions of the field challenged by findings on innovation implementation are reviewed. These studies have major implications for evaluation practice, evaluator roles, the use of evaluation results, and the federal role in evaluation. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Federal Government, Innovation
Peer reviewedWeeks, Edward C. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1982
A theoretical model of an effective experiential educational program for training evaluators is described. Two operating programs are assessed against the requirements of the model. The results of a quasi-experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of the programs in producing important educational outcomes are reported. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Educational Needs, Evaluators, Experiential Learning, Field Experience Programs
Ball, Samuel – Contemporary Education Review, 1982
In reacting to five recent books on program evaluation, eight evaluation perils are discussed: poor preparation of evaluations, programs with unrealistic goals, the mix-up of models, interpersonal conflicts, the morass of measurement, answering evaluation questions, the secondary evaluator as sniper, and hostility from program staff. (CM)
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Wells, Ronald G. – Personnel Journal, 1982
Areas to consider when conducting personnel performance evaluations are discussed. They include: job related criteria, subjective criteria, performance expectations, performance standards, regular scheduling of evaluations, and formal documentation. Guidelines to deal with problems in these areas are also presented. (CT)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Behavioral Objectives, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedLuborsky, Lester; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982
Tested whether independent judges could recognize three different manual-guided psychotherapies, drug counseling, supportive-expressive psychotherapy, and cognitive-behavioral using a special rating form containing scales for the characteristic aspects of each type. Results indicated that manual-guided therapies can be reliably recognized.…
Descriptors: Adults, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Techniques, Drug Abuse
Hutchison, Peggy; Mannell, Roger C. – Parks and Recreation, 1982
Issues that must be dealt with when training recreation managers about evaluation skills are discussed and training strategies, such as simulation and case studies, are explored. The importance of converting evaluation techniques and theory into useful daily practices is stressed, whether the training takes place in the classroom or in a staff…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluators, Higher Education, Management Development
Peer reviewedEvans, Ronald G. – Journal of Research in Personality, 1980
Experiments investigate hypothesis that vulnerable self-esteem internals and externals react more defensively to negative intellectual and personality feedback than congruent internals and externals. Suggested that consistently internal view of causation may increase stress in evaluative situations. Discusses implications for understanding…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Congruence (Psychology), Emotional Response, Evaluators
Peer reviewedConner, Ross F.; Dickman, Frances Baker – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
Issues concerning the professionalization of evaluative research that are discussed in this reply to Morell and Flaherty include: the nature and substance of conflicts in evaluative research, conflicts over methodological perspectives, the role of the evaluator in program planning, and the appropriate uses and users of evaluative information.…
Descriptors: Conflict, Evaluation, Evaluation Needs, Evaluators
Peer reviewedWindle, Charles – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
It is suggested that the developmental phases of program evaluators replicate those of the profession of program evaluation. A trend in program evaluation from program amelioration to program advocacy and ultimately to program accountability is projected. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluators, Federal Regulation, Human Services
Turner, Carol J.; Record, Albert L. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1981
Evaluated the reliability and convergent validity of three rating scales designed to measure self-concept clarity. The ratings of self, peer, and professional judges were compared. Results supported that a basic difference exists between a participant's self-reported constructs and an observer's judgment of that participant's constructs.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedBrandl, John E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
To better understand policy formation, evaluators should be aware of the perspectives from which legislators view evaluators. Illustrations of the impact of evaluation and research projects on policy are provided. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluators, Information Utilization, Legislators
Peer reviewedJacobs, Rick; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1980
Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) are no better or worse than other methods when assessed on a quantitative basis but have greater potential when assessed on use and qualitative criteria. Suggestions are offered for extending BARS research to process questions and domains other than performance appraisal. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Feedback
Peer reviewedTorres, Rosalie T.; Preskill, Hallie S.; Piontek, Mary E. – Evaluation Practice, 1997
Responses of 246 internal and external evaluators about reporting and communicating results show that most use traditional reporting formats, are only moderately satisfied with reporting efforts, recognize many constraints to reporting, and consider high stakeholder involvement essential to effective evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewedLongford, Nicholas T. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
Data from two standard-setting exercises were analyzed using the logistic regression model that assumes no variation in severity of raters, and results were compared with those obtained by logistic regression that allowed for severity variation. Results illustrate the importance of taking between-rater differences into account. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Evaluators, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedKing, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Focuses on the process of evaluation capacity building (ECB) in a school district from the perspective of an internal evaluator hired to develop the evaluation function of the district. Shows how the work was originally conceived and why it changed. Emphasizes the core function of the district's Assessment Department, managing the standardized…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators


