Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 63 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 329 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 827 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1777 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 86 |
| Practitioners | 63 |
| Administrators | 34 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 23 |
| Community | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 64 |
| United Kingdom | 59 |
| Canada | 54 |
| China | 40 |
| United States | 39 |
| California | 37 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 36 |
| Texas | 32 |
| Turkey | 28 |
| Japan | 26 |
| Israel | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStrong, Michael; Rudser, Steven Fritsch – Sign Language Studies, 1986
When hearing raters subjectively evaluated the signed and spoken output of 25 sign language interpreters, rater agreement was between 0.52-0.86; the correlation between subjective and objective evaluation was between 0.59-0.79. Raters were unsuccessful in identifying which interpreters had deaf parents. (CB)
Descriptors: Correlation, Deaf Interpreting, Deafness, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedFrankenberger, William; Harper, Jerry – Mental Retardation, 1986
Questionnaire data from 349 directors of special education and state implementation plans were analyzed to determine which professionals were most often included on multidisciplinary evaluation teams for diagnosing mental retardation. The data revealed variations in type and number of personnel comprising these teams; however, team size…
Descriptors: Administrators, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedGrover, Paul L.; Uguroglu, Margaret E. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1984
Ethical issues relating to naturalistic evaluation are addressed, focusing on the role of the evaluator, problems of privacy and data gathering techniques, and issues relating to the use/abuse of findings. Benefits and costs of the naturalistic approach to program evaluation are also identified. (EGS)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Data Collection, Ethics, Evaluation Methods
RTI International, 2006
The Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) Initiative, funded by the U.S. Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and Justice, is an ambitious federal effort to improve the health and well-being of children and adolescents. The Initiative focuses on integrated prevention and treatment programs, strategies, and services designed to…
Descriptors: Grants, Evaluators, Violence, School Safety
Weigle, Sara Cushing – 1994
This paper describes a study on rater training that involved the analysis of ratings given to English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) compositions by 8 inexperienced and 8 experienced raters both before and after rater training, using FACETS (Linacre, 1990, 1993), which provides measures of rater severity and consistency. The testing text was a…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Essay Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluators
Iowa State Department of Education, 2004
Legislation passed during the 2001 Iowa legislative session established the Student Achievement and Teacher Quality Program, Senate File 476. This legislation requires the Iowa Department of Education (DE) to annually report the statewide progress on the following: (1) Student achievement scores in mathematics and reading at the fourth and eighth…
Descriptors: State Legislation, Academic Achievement, Teacher Competencies, Scores
Peer reviewedBrown, Robert D.; Newman, Dianna L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
In a simulated adversary-advocacy evaluation of a computer-assisted school guidance program, the evaluation audience's reaction to different forms of data, the order of argument presentations, and the rated attitude of the evaluator are shown to influence audience agreement with evaluation recommendations. (CM)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewedZammuto, Raymond F.; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1982
Examines the effects of organizational differences and rater differences on performance appraisals. Self, peer, and supervisory ratings of performance for nurses and for resident advisors were used. Both organization and rater differences have significant, independent effects on performance ratings and may restrict the generality of findings.…
Descriptors: Differences, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Wilson, Richard – New Directions for Higher Education, 1982
Several concepts and themes fundamental to program evaluation are identified: value positions, concept of fairness, and the lack of an ideal applicable to all situations. Evaluation references are selected covering the topics: evaluation approaches, evaluation issues, evaluation in higher education, and administrator evaluation. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Education, Administrator Evaluation, College Programs, Decision Making
Newman, Dianna L.; And Others – CEDR Quarterly, 1979
Students, professional educators, and business personnel rated simulated evaluation reports. Evaluator's sex and professional level of the audience influenced agreement with report recommendations; use of report data did not. (CP)
Descriptors: Adults, Attitudes, Content Analysis, Credibility
Peer reviewedHolden, Ronald R.; Jackson, Douglas N. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
Presented a distinction between concepts of face validity and item subtlety. Trait categories were differentially accessible to individual judges. Higher criterion validities were associated with less subtle and more face-valid items. Results support a rational approach to test construction and emphasize the use of relevant test item content.…
Descriptors: College Students, Concept Formation, Evaluators, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedKipper, David A.; Ginot, Efrat – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
Predicted that the accuracy of evaluating videotape replay of one's own behavior is related to the defense mechanism clusters of the evaluator. Results confirmed the prediction. Furthermore, subjects characterized by projection clusters tended to produce the greatest distortions, and those characterized by turning-against-self clusters evaluated…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cluster Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Evaluators
Peer reviewedSupovitz, Jonathan A.; MacGowan, Andrew, III; Slattery, Jean – Educational Assessment, 1997
Reports on the interrater reliability of a language arts portfolio assessment in the primary grades of the Rochester (New York) school system. Results from approximately 400 primary grade portfolios rated by 2 raters show that teachers can assess their own students' work reliably. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability, Portfolio Assessment
Peer reviewedThompson, Lyke; Herman, Sandra – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1996
This article provides a case study of the use of emergent design, which asks evaluators to adapt their inquiry processes as understanding develops, in the evaluation of a family support program, tracing the emergence of evaluation procedures through three phases. Two phases produced data that policymakers found very helpful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Family Programs
Peer reviewedLunz, Mary E.; Stahl, John A. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1990
Examinations were analyzed using the Rasch model to determine differences in judge severity and grading period stringency for (1) essay examination (subjects were 12 judges and 32 examinees); (2) clinical examination (subjects were 18 judges and 217 examinees); and (3) oral examination (subjects were 46 judges and 270 examinees). (SLD)
Descriptors: Certification, Essay Tests, Evaluators, Examiners

Direct link
