NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 2,521 to 2,535 of 4,794 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B.; And Others – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1977
Indices reflecting the probability that the observed similarity between the multiple-choice test responses of two examinees was due to chance are presented. Applications are presented for apprehending cheaters and for evaluating the prevalence of this form of cheating on an examination. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Cheating, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Webster, G. D.; And Others – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1988
Whether alternative scoring strategies result in improved measurement properties of patient management problems (PMPs) was studied. Nine scoring systems (proficiency, efficiency, select, omit, data gathering, therapy, absolute, goal-oriented, and empiric expert score) were applied to 16 PMPs used in a certifying examination taken by 4,590…
Descriptors: Certification, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Multiple Choice Tests, Physicians
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Welch, Joan; Leichner, Pierre – Journal of Medical Education, 1988
Altering first choices on multiple-choice questions on a medical examination (Canadian Self-Assessment Examination in Psychiatry) was examined to see whether this led to an increase or decrease in the final score. Examinees were one-and-a-half times more likely to improve than lower their score. (MLW)
Descriptors: Graduate Medical Students, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Psychiatry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dodd, David K.; Leal, Linda – Teaching of Psychology, 1988
Discusses answer justification, a technique that allows students to convert multiple-choice items perceived to be "tricky" into short-answer essay questions. Convincing justifications earn students credit for missed items. The procedure is reported to be easy to administer and very popular among students. (Author/GEA)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mishisato, Shizuhiko – Psychometrika, 1984
This study formulates a property of a quantification method, the principle of equivalent partitioning. When used with Guttman's principle of internal consistency, the combination allows the analysis of correlational data in terms of the variate(s) chosen by the investigator. Applications to multiple-choice, rank-order, and paired comparison data…
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Mathematical Models, Matrices, Multiple Choice Tests
Yang, Wen-Ling; Dorans, Neil J.; Tateneni, Krishna – 2002
Scores on the multiple-choice sections of alternate forms are equated through anchor-test equating for the Advanced Placement Program (AP) examinations. There is no linkage of free-response sections since different free-response items are given yearly. However, the free-response and multiple-choice sections are combined to produce a composite.…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Equated Scores, Multiple Choice Tests, Sample Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Strang, Harold R.; Rust, James O. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1973
The major purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of non-cueing immediate knowledge upon answering academic questions constructed so as to minimize intrinsic knowledge of ongoing accuracy. (Author)
Descriptors: Cues, Data Collection, Educational Research, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Samejima, Fumiko – Psychometrika, 1973
The three-parameter logistic model by Birnbaum for the multiple-choice item in the latent trait theory is considered with respect to the item response information function and the unique maximum condition. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Models, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Livingston, Samuel A. – American Educational Research Journal, 1973
Study of language used in multiple choice test showed that verbal complexity of questions had little or no effect on their actual difficulty; if a student knows the content, he can also read well enough to understand the test item. (SP)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Multiple Choice Tests, Performance Factors, Reading Ability
Buckley-Sharp, M. D. – Educational Technology, 1973
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Item Banks, Multiple Choice Tests
Hazlett, C. B. – Educational Technology, 1973
A brief description of a computerized system for the storage and retrieval of multiple choice items.'' (Author/AK)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Item Banks, Multiple Choice Tests
Toggenburger, Frank – Educational Technology, 1973
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Item Banks, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brucia, James – American Biology Teacher, 1972
Descriptors: Biology, Multiple Choice Tests, Secondary School Science, Test Scoring Machines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crehan, Kevin D.; Slakter, Malcolm J. – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Hambleton, Ronald K.; And Others – J Educ Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Reliability
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  165  |  166  |  167  |  168  |  169  |  170  |  171  |  172  |  173  |  ...  |  320