Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 172 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 783 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1644 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2454 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 147 |
| China | 129 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| Indonesia | 45 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedYun, Wang – College Teaching, 2003
Examined the relationship between students' composition scores and the writers' and raters' perceptions of a given topic: does a student receive a higher score if the rater agrees with the student's thesis? Findings indicated that there are other factors, such as students' attitude and cognitive ability that may affect raters' judgments of student…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluators, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHart, Geoff – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1997
Proposes an approach that emphasizes negative, "what did we do wrong?" questions so that technical communicators can obtain useful feedback on documents. Notes that this approach focuses limited resources on areas that need improvement, rather than areas that already work well and that do not require immediate improvement. (RS)
Descriptors: Feedback, Illustrations, Layout (Publications), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedCurtis, Marcia; Herrington, Anne – College Composition and Communication, 2003
Draws upon a longitudinal study of four undergraduate student writers and focuses on the progress of one of them. Questions assumptions that confuse skills assessment with the measurement of academic and personal development. Argues for a broader view of writing development and a teaching approach that fosters it. (SG)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Individual Development, Instructional Improvement, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewedKern, Diane; Andre, Wendy; Schilke, Rebecca; Barton, James; McGuire, Margaret Conn – Reading Teacher, 2003
Shares instructional practices based on narrative and expository texts that will build students' literacy skills and meet many writing assessment demands in the United States. Presents guiding principles for best writing practice, pertinent standards in the English language arts, strategy-based lesson plans, and practical implications for teachers…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Instructional Improvement, State Standards, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedHuot, Brian – College English, 2002
Focuses on the kind of assessment that takes place within a classroom context, and therefore looks at assessing, grading, or testing writing, since when educators talk about classroom assessment they talk of grades and tests, at times using all three terms interchangeably. Hopes to draw educators into new conversations about assessment and the…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education, Portfolio Assessment
Peer reviewedDaiker, Donald; Grogan, Nedra – Journal of Advanced Composition, 1991
Outlines the series of decisions involved in selecting and then using sample papers in holistic evaluation. Attempts to make test-developers aware that they have choices to make and that their choices will have serious consequences for student and evaluator alike. (RS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Holistic Evaluation, Testing Problems, Writing Evaluation
Polin, Linda – Writing Notebook: Creative Word Processing in the Classroom, 1991
Explores portfolio assessment as an alternative writing assessment procedure. Provides tips for collecting work and scoring portfolios. (MG)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Portfolios (Background Materials)
Peer reviewedJohnstone, Velerie M. – English Journal, 1990
Discusses a "write-back" strategy for use when there is insufficient class time for conferencing with peers or the teacher. Notes that the teacher agrees to respond to students' drafts within 24 hours. Discusses 3 options available to students: (1) write back/respond; (2) edit; and (3) writing back. (RS)
Descriptors: Editing, Grading, High Schools, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedHerter, Roberta J. – English Journal, 1991
Describes a successful use of portfolios to assess the development of eleventh grade students' writing skills by inviting self-reflection and encouraging students to assume control over their writing. (KEH)
Descriptors: Grade 11, Secondary Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Assignments
Peer reviewedFlynn, Elizabeth A. – College Composition and Communication, 1990
Describes a 1988 article entitled "Composing as a Woman" as an attempt to reconcile feminist inquiry and composition studies and to persuade composition specialists that the feminist view has a bearing on their field. Explains that a study of the relationship between gender and reading produced a new perspective on student papers. (SG)
Descriptors: Feminism, Higher Education, Humanism, Sex Role
Clark, Beverly Lyon; Clark, Roger D. – Writing Program Administration, 1990
Argues that standardized tests can provide limited guidance, in conjunction with student writing samples, in the decision whether students should be exempted from freshmen writing courses. Suggests that students who write well but whose performance is unstable can be affected, positively or negatively, by exemption results. Suggests that students'…
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Standardized Tests, Student Placement
Peer reviewedRozakis, Laurie – Exercise Exchange, 1988
Claims that holistic scoring offers significant advantages over conventional grading systems for: (1) placing students in extra help or enrichment classes; (2) evaluating incoming or transfer students; (3) regrouping existing classroom situations; and (4) providing an expedient measure of writing achievement. (RAE)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Holistic Evaluation, Needs Assessment
Peer reviewedRoderick, Joan C. – Business Education Forum, 1988
The critiquing and evaluating of resumes and cover letters by business people is important to college students. They know before submitting them what employers expect. (JOW)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Job Search Methods, Resumes (Personal), School Community Relationship
Peer reviewedCollege Composition and Communication, 1995
Presents the position statement of the Conference on College Composition and Communication Executive Committee on writing assessment in both two-year and four-year institutions. Suggests that the primary purpose of the specific assessment should govern its design, its implementation, and the generation and dissemination of its results. Provides…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Objectives, Higher Education, Teacher Role
Peer reviewedLynch, David H.; Golen, Steven – Journal of Education for Business, 1992
Responses of 78 of 150 business communication teachers surveyed showed that peer evaluation of writing largely consists of juniors and seniors who use a teacher-developed analytic scale to evaluate fellow students; and 52 percent of teachers consider it effective in improving writing skills and attitudes. (SK)
Descriptors: Business Communication, College Students, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation


