Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 172 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 783 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1644 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2454 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 147 |
| China | 129 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| Indonesia | 45 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedBarbour, Dennis H. – Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1992
Describes a dual grading process for business writing assignments, initiated to expose students to collaborative evaluation and to verify instructor evaluation. Maintains that receiving feedback from both teacher and students reinforce students' confidence in the evaluation process while teaching them about audience expectations. (SR)
Descriptors: Business Correspondence, Cooperative Learning, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRoy, Emil – Computers and Composition, 1992
Presents a method that uses computers for writing placement exams, a "structured decision system." Argues that it is more economical and efficient than the process that uses real people as readers. (SR)
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Higher Education, Student Placement, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedMcKendy, Thomas – Research in the Teaching of English, 1992
Offers a brief history of an attempt to establish predictive test validity with holistic scoring of writing tests. Asserts that holistically scored writing samples may be practical for some local purposes, but they must be used judiciously. Suggests monitoring the validity of local tests with statistical packages and using teacher ratings as…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Holistic Approach, Holistic Evaluation, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSloat, Elizabeth – English Quarterly, 1990
Explores a way for writing teachers to provide feedback, assess growth, and monitor personal story narrative writing from a positive, supportive and holistic perspective. Lists and explains five dimensions of personal story narrative writing, discusses development, and provides examples of student writing. (PRA)
Descriptors: Holistic Approach, Personal Narratives, Personal Writing, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedScott, Renee S.; Rodgers, Barbara C. – Foreign Language Annals, 1993
This article reports on the process of developing a proficiency-oriented writing contest, as well as a system of assessment of that writing based on a set of rubrics for each level of writing. (Contains six references.) (VWL)
Descriptors: Competition, High Schools, Higher Education, Language Proficiency
Peer reviewedFerris, Dana – TESOL Quarterly, 1994
Sixty-two quantitative, lexical, and syntactic features in a corpus of 160 English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) texts were identified and counted, producing 28 text variables that were compared with ESL proficiency levels of the writers. Results suggest pedagogical implications for ESL composition instructors. (Contains 12 references.) (LB)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Proficiency, Language Teachers, Syntax
Peer reviewedMitchell, Diana; Rigby, Iris – English Journal, 1995
Describes various teaching tips used by a practicing English teacher to enhance writing instruction assessment in the classroom. Focuses on the ways a skills review might be more fun for students. (HB)
Descriptors: English Curriculum, English Instruction, Literature Appreciation, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedPuhr, Kathleen; Workman, Gail – English Journal, 1992
Describes a conferenced writing program in a suburban St. Louis high school. Asserts that this kind of instruction is not merely the utopian ideal of writing teachers but a method that can and should be implemented in all schools. (PRA)
Descriptors: English Instruction, High Schools, Program Descriptions, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedHarris, Helen J. – English Journal, 1992
Describes how students can help evaluate each other in discussion groups and how this improves their writing. Asserts that students appreciate the scrutiny of the conferences and take their own writing much more seriously as a result. Describes this technique in the context of a high school writing workshop. (PRA)
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Discussion, Secondary Education, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedLeahy, Richard – WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1992
Asserts that competency testing as part of a writing program does not have to be a liability to the writing center. Describes the situation at Boise State University, where the writing center helps the students to prepare for the competency exams. Discusses each exam and the process of helping the students. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Test Wiseness, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewedPerkins, Kyle; And Others – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1991
Discusses a concurrent validity study of an indirect measure of English-as-a-Second-Language writing based on information processing: anagram solving, word reordering, paragraph assembly tests, etc. The criterion measure was a direct, holistic measure of writing. Analysis revealed that the indirect measure did not exhibit concurrent validity for…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Information Processing, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Validity
Peer reviewedPurves, Alan C. – Research in the Teaching of English, 1992
Reflects on three major issues that confronted researchers conducting a comparative study of achievement in written composition as they attempt to measure performance in writing across many languages and cultures. Concludes that most assessments of writing simply measure perceived drafting quality, which is a highly subjective judgment. (MG)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences, Writing (Composition), Writing Ability
Resnick, Daniel P.; Myers, Miles – Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 1992
Describes the goals of the New Standards Project, and the first Writing Calibration Workshop at the Sagamore on Lake George in New York. Asserts that the workshop experiment shows that there is enough agreement among English teachers to consider developing a system of common standards that does not depend upon a single examination. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Teacher Education, Teacher Improvement, Writing Evaluation
Brent, Doug – Writing Instructor, 1991
Evaluates three computer software programs designed to help writing teachers to respond to and comment on student papers. Asserts that these programs do not actually assist teachers in writing comments, but help them to avoid writing comments. Argues that teachers expect too much of the computer as an aid to response. (PRA)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Computer Software Reviews, Computers, Rhetorical Criticism
Electronic Mail as a Vehicle for Peer Response: Conversations of High- and Low-Apprehensive Writers.
Peer reviewedMabrito, Mark – Written Communication, 1991
Investigates whether high- and low-apprehensive freshman composition students respond differently as peer evaluators in a face-to-face group versus a group using electronic mail. Finds that high apprehensives exhibit different strategies than low apprehensives for peer evaluation, and that high apprehensives participate more and rely more on the…
Descriptors: Electronic Mail, Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation


