Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 199 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1099 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2646 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4708 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Sampson, Victor | 30 |
| Hample, Dale | 28 |
| Kuhn, Deanna | 26 |
| Erduran, Sibel | 23 |
| Hand, Brian | 22 |
| Benoit, William L. | 21 |
| McNeill, Katherine L. | 21 |
| Noroozi, Omid | 21 |
| Chen, Ying-Chih | 19 |
| Grooms, Jonathon | 19 |
| Infante, Dominic A. | 18 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 401 |
| Practitioners | 327 |
| Researchers | 71 |
| Administrators | 53 |
| Students | 41 |
| Policymakers | 14 |
| Community | 5 |
| Parents | 5 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 223 |
| China | 146 |
| Australia | 108 |
| United States | 105 |
| United Kingdom | 103 |
| Indonesia | 82 |
| Germany | 79 |
| Canada | 68 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 62 |
| Netherlands | 60 |
| Sweden | 58 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 6 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedRhodes, Jack; Pfau, Michael W. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1985
Responds to the issues raised in the previous article on the nature of the debate resolution (CS 706 818). Deals particularly with comments on counter-warrants. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedReynolds, William – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1986
Discusses a routine to use for identifying and classifying the values present in a particular policy system in academic debate. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Models, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedCorsi, Jerome R. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1986
Reflects on Daniel Rohrer's legacy: a view of debate as a comparison of policy systems. Advocates greater emphasis on value-oriented debate as a complementary outgrowth of policy deliberation and suggests experimentation in wording resolutions and in the use of computers. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Models, Persuasive Discourse
Stroud, Scott R. – 2000
Forensic educators stand at a pivotal point in the development of National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) debate culture and standards; we have enough experience behind us to see where NPDA is going, but not so much "tradition" as to enslave us to the past. One area of reform that is highlighted by this paper is the removal of…
Descriptors: Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Kline, John A. – Speech Monographs, 1971
A study of the hypothesis that the type of evidence a speaker considers important might be related to how dogmatic he is. In this study, evidence was used as the dependent variable; dogmatism as the independent variable. (Author/JB)
Descriptors: Dogmatism, Manipulative Materials, Personality Studies, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedLucas, Stephen E. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1971
States why the equation of logos with logic is untenable in light of Aristotle's conceptions of the nature of man and the nature of rhetoric. (Author)
Descriptors: Logic, Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy, Rhetoric
Peer reviewedHaskell, Robert E.; Hauser, Gerard A. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
Explores the rhetorical problem of concretizing the ideal via the relationship between form and fact in Richard Weaver's theory of truth. Reveals that reliance on analogic form permits Weaver's arguments to function externally and internally. Suggests that analogic structure, example, and analogy are fundamental ways of rhetorical knowing. (JMF)
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy, Rhetoric, Rhetorical Criticism
Peer reviewedAlkin, Marvin C. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1979
This is an introduction to the six following articles, which discuss three people's views of evaluation in the perspective of "The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation" by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, a book that contrasts argument and persuasion with reason and reasoning. (See TM 504 631-636). (CTM)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Logic, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedGuba, Egon G. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1979
The author discusses recent changes in his thinking about evaluation, decision making, and authority and finds the notion of a logical, rational, synoptic decision process to be hardly defensible. (CTM)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation, Individual Development, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedO'Keefe, Daniel J. – Argumentation and Advocacy, 1997
States that argumentative explicitness is acknowledged as a normative ideal in the practice of argument. Addresses one facet of the question of whether argumentative explicitness inevitably sacrifices instrumental success, by offering a meta-analytic review of the persuasive effects associated with degree of articulation given to the advocate's…
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication Research, Meta Analysis, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedParker, Rodney D.; Hildebrandt, Herbert W. – Management Communication Quarterly, 1996
States that visual persuasion in constructing buildings is often part of business strategy--architects try to link corporate goals with management's desire for buildings to represent, for instance, the mission, the goal, the power and strength of the company. Argues that modern visual strategy mirrors ancient rhetorical concepts of persuasion.…
Descriptors: Architecture, Business Communication, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedBirdsell, David S.; Groarke, Leo – Argumentation and Advocacy, 1996
Explores preconditions for developing a theory of visual argument, emphasizing frequent lucidity of visual meaning, importance and varieties of visual context, argumentative complexities raised by notions of representation and resemblance, and questions visual persuasion pose for the standard distinction between argument and persuasion. Contains…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Persuasive Discourse, Scholarship, Visual Stimuli
Peer reviewedPalczewski, Catherine Helen – Argumentation and Advocacy, 1996
Explores the theoretical and critical implications of feminist research on argumentation, and points to directions where feminist theory will continue to challenge predominant thinking about argumentation. Introduces the articles in this special issue on argumentation and feminisms. (PA)
Descriptors: Feminism, Feminist Criticism, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedOlson, Lester C. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1997
Analyzes Audre Lorde's speech which interweaves commentary on the silence surrounding breast cancer with insights about silence drawn from her experiences as a member of several subordinated communities. Finds she comments on silencing and power, sexism, verbal abuse, violence and sexualized aggression, shame, and hostile social environments--her…
Descriptors: Cancer, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetorical Criticism, Rhetorical Invention
Peer reviewedWoods, Bradford S.; Murphy, P. Karen – International Journal of Educational Research, 2001
Explores the constructs of "coming to know" (conceptual change) and "coming to believe" (persuasion) by identifying theoretical forbears of conceptual change and persuasion theory in the domains of philosophy and psychology with the intent of tracing their influence on educational research and practice. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy, Psychology


