NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 4,801 to 4,815 of 9,443 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zarefsky, David; Henderson, Bill – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1983
Defends hypothesis testing in academic debate. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hollihan, Thomas A. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1983
Argues that the practical outcomes of hypothesis testing in academic debate should be considered. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cushman, Donald P.; Prelli, Lawrence J. – Central States Speech Journal, 1981
Argues that rhetoric is creative and that rhetorical argument generates knowledge. (PD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Epistemology, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowland, Robert C. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Criticizes three paradigms currently used in debate: hypothesis testing, policy systems analysis, and the "tabula rasa" stance. Offers five functional standards for evaluating competing debate paradigms. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zarefsky, David – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Responds to Rowland's article, (CS 705 841). Addresses four problems in Rowland's argument. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skopec, Eric W. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
Examines Thomas Reid's philosophy of rhetoric and identifies the principles to which he was committed, including his classification of knowledge, emphasis on artistic expression, and theory of natural signification. (JMF)
Descriptors: Classification, Fine Arts, Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burleson, Brant R. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1980
Continues an ongoing debate with Charles Willard and other argumentation scholars. Examines the claim that arguments are essentially nondiscursive phenomena by reviewing relevant empirical evidence. Assesses the utility of formal characterizations and hermeneutic inquiry as tools of argument analysis by considering the practical problems intrinsic…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetorical Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Church, Russell T., Ed. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979
Presents listings covering history and practice of argumentation, theory of argumentation, scholastic forensics, experimental studies, interpersonal conflicts, political campaign communication, and articles of general interest. (JMF)
Descriptors: Debate, Interpersonal Relationship, Literature Reviews, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gaines, Robert N. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1979
Discusses J. L. Austin's treatment of perlocution and extends it to an analysis of five types of perlocution. Proposes a set of conditions necessary and sufficient for consummation of any perlocutionary act. (JMF)
Descriptors: Information Theory, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric, Rhetorical Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William Lyon – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1980
Examines the concept of example in Aristotle's inventional theory. Rejects recent claims that the example reasons from part to part, without a mediating generalization, and then explicates Aristotle's view of the example. (JMF)
Descriptors: Generalization, Induction, Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lull, James; Mulac, Anthony – Journalism Quarterly, 1978
Concludes that a single television counter advertisement concerning a brand of aspirin did not cause viewers to lessen appreciably their attitude favorability toward the brand. (GT)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitudes, Persuasive Discourse, Television Commercials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daillak, Richard H. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1979
The evaluation methods of "naturalistic inquiry" and of "judicial evaluation" support the importance of argumentation; but "The New Rhetoric; A Treatise on Argumentation" focuses on the technique of argument and neglects the problems of judging the merits of conflicting arguments and of harnessing argumentation to…
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lunsford, Andrea A. – College Composition and Communication, 1979
Carl Rogers' theory of argument is in accord with traditional Aristotelian theory since both are based on mutual trust and understanding. (DD)
Descriptors: Educational Theories, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kulawiec, E. P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
The label "fad" imparts negative connotations. Discusses one new concept, labeled a "fad", whose value is neither fleeting nor insignificant. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Futures (of Society), Persuasive Discourse, Student Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hantula, James – Journal of Thought, 1977
Many contemporary educators view the child as the embodiment of incorporal essence. Unless the assistance of angels is invoked, says the author, it is difficult to understand how a child can achieve happiness according to current prescriptions. Criticizes teaching methods and educational attitudes concerning the proper way to develop children in…
Descriptors: Child Development, Critical Thinking, Models, Persuasive Discourse
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  317  |  318  |  319  |  320  |  321  |  322  |  323  |  324  |  325  |  ...  |  630