NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 4,951 to 4,965 of 9,443 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Gregg B.; Congalton, Jeanini DiPaolo – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1987
Viewing generic arguments (arguments applied to an entire class or group of opposing arguments) in terms of the argument fields of a debate resolution strengthens the generic argument as a debate concept, brings debate theory and argument together, and offers a perspective for evaluating generic arguments in academic and the real world debate.…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Evaluation Methods, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vaughn, Mina A. – Communication Reports, 1988
Uses value analysis to examine the rhetoric of a large multinational high-technology organization, focusing on the value-oriented arguments that emerge from the rhetorical strategies utilized in the organization's recruitment and entry level practices. Notes the recurrent rhetorical strategy of stating only the organization's positive values. (MM)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Organizational Communication, Persuasive Discourse, Recruitment
Brummett, Barry – Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1988
Considers the way in which recent apocalyptic religious discourse motivates actions and attitudes toward secular issues by appealing to sacred texts. Traces one such strategy, termed "transfer." (SR)
Descriptors: Audience Response, Communication Research, Persuasive Discourse, Religion
Henry, David – Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1988
Examines Mario Cuomo's keynote address at the 1984 Democratic National Convention as a case study in rhetorical interaction. Argues that the keynote setting presented both generic and immediate constraints, which Cuomo resolved through a rhetorical strategy rooted in metaphor as an argumentative technique. (MM)
Descriptors: Audience Response, Metaphors, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetorical Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beach, Richard; Anson, Chris M. – Written Communication, 1988
Describes a study designed to identify indices of writers' varying conceptions of self, audience, and rhetorical situation in an evolving context. Concludes that older writers used situational strategies based on relationships, and younger writers used assertive strategies based on position. (JAD)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetorical Invention, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teich, Nathaniel – Journal of Advanced Composition, 1987
Claims Rogerian principles of communication and problem solving offer important supplements to teaching traditional argumentation, especially in advanced composition courses. (MS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Problem Solving, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morley, Donald Dean; Walker, Kim B. – Communication Monographs, 1987
Examines the role of importance, novelty, and plausibility of message information in producing belief change. Demonstrates that significant belief changes only occurred when message information was high in importance, novelty, and plausibility. (NKA)
Descriptors: Beliefs, Communication Research, Interaction, Interpersonal Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goodnight, G. Thomas – Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
Examines how public discourse engages and redirects the constitutive powers of human communication. (JK)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Debate, Journalism, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Keefe, Daniel J. – Central States Speech Journal, 1987
Reviews research concerning the role played by variations in the timing of communicator identification as one aspect of the effect that communicator credibility has on persuasive communication. Claims that variations in the timing of the identification of the source of a persuasive communication can produce substantial differences in persuasive…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Credibility, Identification, Interpersonal Communication
Falk, Charles F. – New Directions for Continuing Education, 1986
Discusses the promotion of continuing education. Topics covered are (1) planning, (2) budgeting, (3) promotional tools, (4) analysis of effectiveness, and (5) continuing education staff roles. (CH)
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Marketing, Mass Media, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braun, John E. – Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1985
Surveys books (including two homilectics textbooks) that explain varieties of and forces behind contemporary preaching. (PD)
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Books, Clergy, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolff, Jurgen M. – Journal of Film and Video, 1984
Instructs writing students on how to verbally present their ideas. Points out that success in screenwriting depends not only on how well scripts are written but also how well screenwriters sell themselves and their scripts. Adds comments for instructors who want to teach pitching as part of a scriptwriting course. (PD)
Descriptors: Film Study, Higher Education, Marketing, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Corder, Jim. W. – Rhetoric Review, 1985
Argues that we are all fiction-makers/historians, that most failures of communication result from some willful or inadvertent but unknowing violation of the space and time we and others live in, and that most of our speaking is tribal talk. (EL)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Conflict Resolution, Discourse Analysis, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herbeck, Dale A.; Katsulas, John P. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1985
Notes that the traditional conception of the debate resolution is held responsible for decreasing participation in academic debate, declining quality of argumentation, and the frustrating proliferation of "squirrel" cases. Discusses alternatives. Contends that reasonability continues to be the best standard for evaluating topicality…
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zarefsky, David – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1984
Responds that hypothesis testing is not a formula for judging debates but an attempt to model the nature of argumentation itself. Addresses criticisms of hypothesis testing and the role of paradigms in argumentation theory and practice. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  327  |  328  |  329  |  330  |  331  |  332  |  333  |  334  |  335  |  ...  |  630