Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 199 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1099 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2646 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4708 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Sampson, Victor | 30 |
| Hample, Dale | 28 |
| Kuhn, Deanna | 26 |
| Erduran, Sibel | 23 |
| Hand, Brian | 22 |
| Benoit, William L. | 21 |
| McNeill, Katherine L. | 21 |
| Noroozi, Omid | 21 |
| Chen, Ying-Chih | 19 |
| Grooms, Jonathon | 19 |
| Infante, Dominic A. | 18 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 401 |
| Practitioners | 327 |
| Researchers | 71 |
| Administrators | 53 |
| Students | 41 |
| Policymakers | 14 |
| Community | 5 |
| Parents | 5 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 223 |
| China | 146 |
| Australia | 108 |
| United States | 105 |
| United Kingdom | 103 |
| Indonesia | 82 |
| Germany | 79 |
| Canada | 68 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 62 |
| Netherlands | 60 |
| Sweden | 58 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 6 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Kline, John A. – Speech Monographs, 1971
The author reports results of an experiment designed to determine the types" of encoding behavior in the selection of evidence speakers make for persuasive messages. (Author/MS)
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Persuasive Discourse, Q Methodology
Wallace, Karl R. – Speech Monographs, 1971
Bacon's views of the faculties of understanding and reason are presented and explained in reference to Baconian rhetoric. Understanding, Rhetoric, Insinuative and Imaginative Reason are defined. (Author/MS)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cognitive Processes, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedAllen, Bem P. – Psychological Reports, 1970
Descriptors: Attitude Change, College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Experiments
Peer reviewedCrable, Richard E. – Communication Monographs, 1982
Develops the "knowledge-as-status" perspective and its model to help describe what knowledge is and how knowledge changes over time. Concludes that knowledge in a particular field will progress or regress on the basis of reasons for and against the changes--reasons advanced and analyzed in a rhetorically epistemological way. (PD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Epistemology, Knowledge Level, Models
Peer reviewedMorello, John T. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1982
Looks at incrementalism as a means of revitalizing the role of inherency arguments in modern debate. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Decision Making, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Irwin, Harry – Simulation/Games for Learning, 1981
Describes how the Westernport Game, a commercially available simulation designed to teach augmentation and reasoning, was modified for use in a large enrollment communications course within a business studies program at Kuring-gai College of Advanced Education in Sydney, Australia. Sixteen references are listed. (LLS)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Business Education, Communications, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedKelly, Kathleen – Exercise Exchange, 1982
Discusses activities to teach a Rogerian approach to argument to help novice writers suspend evaluation of the opponent's position and to build their own position on values and knowledge they can share with the opponent. Includes discussion of a passage exemplifying Rogerian strategy. (HTH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Persuasive Discourse, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedFlaningam, Carl D. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981
Discusses the concomitant advantages case in academic debate. Examines the distinction between concomitant and comparative advantages and the implications of this distinction for concomitant advantages as a form of argument. (PD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedKneupper, Charles W. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981
Explores argumentation theory from the perspective of social constructivism. Examines the relationships and functions of argument-as-structure and argument-as-process and pursues some of the epistemic implications. (PD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Epistemology, Interaction, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedRay, John W. – Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
Examines the concept of the universal audience as the basic factor of Chaim Perelman's rhetorical theory and concludes that it is subject to the same criticism as Rousseau's general will and Kant's categorical imperative. (JMF)
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication (Thought Transfer), Persuasive Discourse, Philosophy
Peer reviewedKatula, Richard A.; Roth, Richard W. – College Composition and Communication, 1980
Discusses the "stock issues" approach to argument, presents a contemporary stock issue system for the arrangement of a single composition, and constructs a model argument as a way of demonstrating how the system works. (FL)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Models, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric
Peer reviewedDemo, Mary Penasack – Communication Education, 1979
An annotated bibliography of 20 documents from the ERIC database, representing a spectrum of persuaders--men and women who employ strategies to change minds and modify behaviors. (JMF)
Descriptors: Interaction, Interpersonal Relationship, Persuasive Discourse, Public Speaking
Peer reviewedMcCorkle, Suzanne – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1980
Discusses the use of transcending claims in argument as an implicit attempt to move the focus of an interaction from the challenged claim and, thus, to circumvent argument on the original claim. (JMF)
Descriptors: Debate, Interaction, Interpersonal Relationship, Logic
Peer reviewedQuereshi, M.Y.; Strauss, Lloyd – Social Behavior and Personality, 1980
An extension of inoculation theory, controverted belief, was investigated by manipulating previous attack as part of a group discussion situation in which actual defense of an issue was considered essential for having an inoculating effect. The experimental groups were equally immunized against verbal attacks. (Author)
Descriptors: Beliefs, Group Discussion, Interaction Process Analysis, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewedMader, Diane C. – ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 1980
Notes that recent composition textbooks have classified Carl Rogers' work as a new rhetoric or as an alternative to classical argument. Demonstrates that to portray Rogers' method as a form of argument is to misunderstand his intent and that, while Rogers and Aristotle are similar superficially, their differences are profound. (FL)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Rhetoric, Speech Communication


