Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 5 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 43 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2397 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7984 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Hwang, Gwo-Jen | 34 |
| Geban, Omer | 19 |
| Huang, Yueh-Min | 19 |
| Vaughn, Sharon | 18 |
| Fien, Hank | 16 |
| Hwang, Wu-Yuin | 16 |
| Smolkowski, Keith | 16 |
| Shadiev, Rustam | 14 |
| Chen, Nian-Shing | 13 |
| Clarke, Ben | 13 |
| Baker, Scott K. | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 48 |
| Teachers | 48 |
| Practitioners | 19 |
| Policymakers | 10 |
| Counselors | 8 |
| Students | 5 |
| Administrators | 4 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 705 |
| Iran | 312 |
| Taiwan | 289 |
| Indonesia | 130 |
| California | 129 |
| Germany | 120 |
| Nigeria | 118 |
| China | 107 |
| Netherlands | 107 |
| Spain | 100 |
| Texas | 99 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 69 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 103 |
| Does not meet standards | 79 |
Laxer, Robert M.; And Others
This study was designed to answer two questions: (1) Is the systematic desensitization of test anxiety effective with secondary school students?; (2) Is relaxation per se as useful a technique as systematic desensitization? High test anxious secondary-school students were assigned to one of two experimental conditions, desensitization or…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, High School Students
Gropper, Robert L. – 1969
The comprehension of aurally-presented narrative passages by fourth-grade children as a function of listening rate and performance on 11 predictor variables was investigated. The predictor tests included: PPVT, Otis Intelligence Test, MAT, Listening Comprehension, Digit Span, Coding, Auditory Attention Span, Clerical Speed, Perceptual Speed,…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Grade 4, Listening Skills
Peer reviewedLi, Anita, K. F. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1978
Kindergarten children were randomly assigned: free play, make-believe, imitation, and control. Given an alternate-uses test (paper towel, match box, paper clip, and screwdriver), free play and make-believe subjects produced significantly more nonstandard responses for paper clip than control subjects and make-believe subjects more than free play…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Creativity, Experimental Groups, Imitation
Peer reviewedBjorklund, Anders – Journal of Human Resources, 1988
Experiments where participants are randomly assigned into experimental and control groups are often regarded as the ideal approach to evaluation of labor force policies. This paper shows that such design can yield misleading and incomplete information. It proposes alternate designs that permit estimation of marginal as well as average program…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Experiments, Labor Force
Myers, David; Dynarski, Mark – 2003
This booklet contains questions and answers about random assignment in program evaluation and intervention research. The main purpose of program evaluation research in education is to determine whether programs help the students they are designed to serve and whether new ideas for education programs still under development are worthy of extension…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Groups
Braun, John R. – Meas Evaluation Guidance, 1970
Control subjects completed Book IV of the Edwards Personality Inventory under instructions to be honest while experimental subjects were instructed to fake so as to make an excellent impression while also concealing their faking. Differences between group means were small. (Author/EK)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Personality Assessment
Peer reviewedUffelman, Robert L.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1971
The effects of in-service training programs on their participants are evaluated. (CK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewedGriffey, David C. – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1982
The advantages and assumptions of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and an alternative approach to ANCOVA which uses simultaneous and nonsimultaneous inference techniques are presented with an example of the latter's use. This approach is advocated for situations where it is suspected that dependent measures are a function of some initial aptitude…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Experimental Groups, Regression (Statistics), Research Methodology
Peer reviewedJudd, Charles M.; Kenny, David A. – Evaluation Review, 1981
Rationale and procedures for conducting process analysis in evaluation research are discussed. Two different procedures for estimating mediation are discussed, as well as procedures for examining whether a treatment exerts its effects, in part, by altering mediating process that produces outcome. Benefits of process analysis in evaluation research…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Models
Peer reviewedMedway, Frederic J.; Venino, Geraldine R. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1982
This study examined the effects of performance patterns and attributional information regarding performance causes on attributions and task persistence in fourth and fifth graders who tended to minimize effort as a cause of school performance. Performance patterns did not influence attributions or persistence. Effort feedback influenced…
Descriptors: Achievement Need, Attribution Theory, Experimental Groups, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedMorowitz, Harold J. – Teachers College Record, 1980
The sciences of nutrition and toxicology require deep methodological reexamination. (JD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Experimental Groups, Nutrition, Physical Health
Peer reviewedKazdin, Alan E. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980
Problems associated with randomization tests in single- case experiments are discussed. This article follows a discussion of randomization tests in single case studies in the same issue of this journal. (See TM 505 799; 505 801).(Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Research Problems
Peer reviewedLevy, Kenneth J. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how many more subjects are required to achieve equal power when testing certain hypotheses concerning proportions if the randomized response technique is employed for estimating a population proportion instead of the conventional technique. (Author)
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewedSwank, Paul; Schmid, John – Journal of Experimental Education, 1978
McNemar's discussion of error reduction in a mixed two-group design fails to provide an algebraic presentation of this error reduction. This paper presents not only the algebraic development of the error term but shows that under certain conditions mixing may increase experimental error. (Author)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Experimental Groups, Matched Groups, Mathematical Formulas
Peer reviewedBryan, Tanis – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1991
The selection of subjects for research on learning disabilities is a function of contemporary notions about learning disabilities, the purpose of the study and level of knowledge about the topic, and practical constraints. Denigrations of the extant research database, along with unaffordable demands for subject selection and descriptions, threaten…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Learning Disabilities, Participant Characteristics, Research Design


