Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 397 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2115 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5084 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 8364 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Kalyuga, Slava | 36 |
| Sweller, John | 32 |
| Paas, Fred | 30 |
| Hiebert, Elfrieda H. | 24 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 23 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 19 |
| Costley, Jamie | 18 |
| Hwang, Gwo-Jen | 17 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 17 |
| Plake, Barbara S. | 14 |
| Huang, Yueh-Min | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 352 |
| Teachers | 280 |
| Researchers | 187 |
| Policymakers | 139 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Students | 22 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Community | 2 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 252 |
| China | 231 |
| Australia | 220 |
| Germany | 176 |
| Taiwan | 145 |
| Canada | 142 |
| Indonesia | 125 |
| United Kingdom | 124 |
| United States | 105 |
| California | 101 |
| South Korea | 97 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Phelan, Joseph G. – J Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Arousal Patterns, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Psychological Characteristics
Peer reviewedResnick, Lauren B.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Difficulty Level, Kindergarten Children, Learning Processes
Peer reviewedZelkind, Irving; Bachhuber, Mary – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Attitudes, College Students, Difficulty Level, Geometric Concepts
Blasi, E. R.; And Others – Percept Mot Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Design, Difficulty Level, Discrimination Learning, Measurement Instruments
O'Neil, Harold, F., Jr.; and others – J Educ Psychol, 1969
Paper based on this research was presented at the 1968 American Educational Research Association Meetings, Chicago, Illinois. Paper supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Office of Education.
Descriptors: Anxiety, Computer Assisted Instruction, Difficulty Level, Learning Problems
Peer reviewedCaron, Rose F.; And Others – Child Development, 1982
To determine whether infants can form face expression categories, groups of infants 18 to 24 weeks old, along with those 30 weeks old, were habituated by the infant control procedure to photographs of four different female faces, each with an identical expression (happiness or surprise). Results are discussed in terms of age and sex differences.…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Classification, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedAponik, David Allen; Dembo, Myron H. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
An investigation of the causal attributions of success and failure performances on various levels of task difficulty by 36 learning disabled and 36 nondisabled adolescents revealed that Ss' perceptions of the task difficulty levels were significant determinants of the two groups' differing causal attributions. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Attribution Theory, Difficulty Level, Failure
Peer reviewedMcCabe, Ann E.; And Others – Child Development, 1982
The performance of children ages three through eight years on a series of class-inclusion problems was examined in two studies. Three patterns of performance were observed: three- and four-year-olds responded in an approximately haphazard pattern, five- and six-year-olds tended to be consistently wrong, and seven- and eight-year-olds showed a…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedPapsdorf, James D.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
An anagram task administered to high and low test-anxious subjects under varied levels of external distraction showed a significant main effect of test anxiety for the "hard" anagrams which also interacted with the subjects' sex and distraction. The effects of increments of anxiety arousal produced by distraction are discussed.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedOber, Scot – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1983
This article provides indices of typing difficulty of typical business writing. These indices are somewhat higher than those found in earlier studies and are much higher than the indices used in textbooks as representing normal difficulty. (SSH)
Descriptors: Business Correspondence, Clerical Occupations, Difficulty Level, Job Performance
Peer reviewedCameron, Catherine Ann – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981
Three experiments investigated effects of attentional factors on children's learning set performance. Younger children's learning was differentially affected by two or more irrelevant dimensions. Practice improved performance for all ages. Results confirmed that irrelevant dimensions and within-problems exposure interact with age and amount of…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Children, Difficulty Level
Marco, Gary L. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1981
This chapter helps the general reader to understand the test equating issues associated with test disclosure. It also helps the testing practitioner to recognize situations in which equating is necessary, and to understand how to accomplish various kinds of equating. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, College Entrance Examinations, Data Collection, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedBergan, John R.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
Whether hierarchical ordering among fraction identification problems reflects the replacement of simple rules by complex rules was investigated. Latent class techniques revealed that children applied rules that were adequate for simple problems but had to be replaced to solve more complex problems. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics, Fractions
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia H.; Weiss, Michael G. – Child Development, 1982
The purpose of this research was to examine developmental changes in the knowledge about what variables affect performance on the incidental learning task. Kindergarteners, second graders, fifth graders, and college students indicated on a rating scale how many animals a hypothetical person would remember under easy and difficult levels of each…
Descriptors: Adults, Attention, Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedTerwilliger, James S.; Lele, Kaustubh – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979
Different indices for the internal consistency, reproducibility, or homogeneity of a test are based upon highly similar conceptual frameworks. Illustrations are presented to demonstrate how the maximum and minimum values of KR20 are influenced by test difficulty and the shape of the distribution of test scores. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Mathematical Formulas, Statistical Analysis


