NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 91 to 105 of 2,260 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dally, Kerry; Holbrook, Allyson; Lovat, Terence; Fairbairn, Hedy – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
There has been substantial research on doctoral supervision and examination, yet rarely a focus on what happens at the end-stage of the process when examiner feedback is received and addressed. This article reports survey findings (n = 262) from a study investigating supervisor perceptions about Australian end-stage doctoral examination processes.…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Writing Evaluation, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Jing; Zhang, Lawrence Jun; Parr, Judy M. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Effective revision necessitates substantial self-regulation in managing the underlying sub-processes and in drawing on relevant knowledge and strategies. Unskilled writers, especially when they have to write in a second/foreign language (L2/FL), might find revision difficult to execute. This study leveraged on the Self-Regulated Strategy…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, English (Second Language), Revision (Written Composition), Self Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrés Alexis Ramírez-Coronel; Jazmín Cevasco; Franco Londra; Gastón Saux – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2024
Misconceptions or inaccurate ideas about Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be found in college students from health-related careers. Refutation texts explicitly introduce inaccurate information, refute it, and introduce alternative, more accurate information. This study examined the role of refutation texts in revising misconceptions about AD in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Nursing Students, Nursing Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jing Yan; Yu Zhu; Xinrong Ye – SAGE Open, 2024
Research on how peer feedback affects second language (L2) writing in higher education has been limited. This study examines the impact of peer feedback on revision and literature review writing in learners of Chinese as an L2 at a university in mainland China. The study analyzed feedback, revisions, and writing performance of 30 students. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Locke, Sean R.; Osborne, Jenna; Jung, Mary E. – Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 2023
The iterative process of writing a co-authored manuscript may take several months to complete. Draft-in-a-day is an alternative group-based approach to writing that draws on concepts from social cognitive and group dynamics theories to efficiently write the first draft of a manuscript, while providing rich opportunities for trainees to develop…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Writing Processes, Authors, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cowan, Mairi; Evans-Tokaryk, Tyler; Farooqi, Abdullah; Graham, Allison; Kaler, Michael – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2021
On a revise-and-resubmit assignment in a large introductory History course, students were provided with feedback that was phrased either as questions, statements, or imperatives. This study examines which form was most likely to lead to improvement in the students' writing. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze a data set…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Improvement, College Freshmen, History
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leng, Jing; Yi, Yuhe; Gu, Xiaoqing – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021
The rapid development of social media tools has drawn much research interest in teacher education. This development has suggested that a wiki with discussion (i.e., an enhanced wiki) seems valuable in facilitating online collaborative and interactive learning. This study examined dynamic patterns of revision behavior in group writing by…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Interaction, Cooperation, Preservice Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Watts, Julie – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2021
Technical and professional communication master's students work with a faculty advisor to complete a three-credit independent research (IR) project, featuring original research. Stakeholders recommended the IR thesis be revised to better communicate IR to industry. Using a writing, activity theory, and genre theory lens, I analyzed what…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Student Research, Masters Theses, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Elena Shvidko – Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 2021
Providing feedback on student work is a fundamental aspect of instruction and an important part of the learning process. A considerable amount of literature describes the pedagogical value of different types of feedback--explicit vs. implicit, comprehensive vs. selective, direct vs. indirect, and feedback on content vs. feedback on form--thus…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Teacher Student Relationship, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yishen Song; Qianta Zhu; Huaibo Wang; Qinhua Zheng – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
Manually scoring and revising student essays has long been a time-consuming task for educators. With the rise of natural language processing techniques, automated essay scoring (AES) and automated essay revising (AER) have emerged to alleviate this burden. However, current AES and AER models require large amounts of training data and lack…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Susan Lang; Clinton Morrison Jr.; Kathleen Brawley – Writing Center Journal, 2024
What do writers do with the feedback they receive? While the answer will vary depending on the writer's experience and the rhetorical situation, understanding what writers do can provide important information for course redesign and professional development of tutors and instructors. In this first of two manuscripts, the authors examine how…
Descriptors: Laboratories, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Tutoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tremblay, Kathryn A.; Binder, Katherine S.; Chuy, Anneli – COABE Journal: The Resource for Adult Education, 2022
This study sought to examine the pre-task planning and post-task revising practices of adults with low literacy and how those practices affect overall writing quality. Seventy-six adults with low literacy composed essays in response to a prompt and were given time for pre-task planning and post-task revising. Results showed that participants with…
Descriptors: Adult Students, Adult Basic Education, Adult Literacy, Writing Skills
Kristie L. Miner – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Educators play an important role in ensuring that students attain the necessary strategic actions to become skilled writers. Studies have indicated that teachers need to consistently embed a larger range of evidence-based writing practices in their instruction to help their students improve the overall quantity and quality of their writing. The…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Strategies, Instructional Effectiveness, Prewriting
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vuogan, Alyssa; Li, Shaofeng – TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 2023
Peer feedback is a frequent feature of second language (L2) writing instruction. However, whether it is facilitative of L2 writing development is controversial. This meta-analysis aggregates the quantitative results of 26 empirical studies to (1) provide an accurate estimate of peer feedback's effectiveness in improving L2 writing, (2) compare its…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vince Mitchell; Erica Borgstrom; Sam Murphy; Charlene Campbell; Sandy Sieminski; Sandy Fraser – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study explores the experiences of five distance learners at a UK university who needed support to resubmit their final assignment following a fail result. Having received written feedback on the submission, we asked how this could be best delivered to inform and motivate a successful resubmission. Written feedback alone was found to be…
Descriptors: Distance Education, Foreign Countries, Academic Failure, Assignments
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  151