NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 121 to 135 of 3,162 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michael D. Carey; Stefan Szocs – Language Testing, 2024
This controlled experimental study investigated the interaction of variables associated with rating the pronunciation component of high-stakes English-language-speaking tests such as IELTS and TOEFL iBT. One hundred experienced raters who were all either familiar or unfamiliar with Brazilian-accented English or Papua New Guinean Tok Pisin-accented…
Descriptors: Dialects, Pronunciation, Suprasegmentals, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jordan M. Wheeler; Allan S. Cohen; Shiyu Wang – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
Topic models are mathematical and statistical models used to analyze textual data. The objective of topic models is to gain information about the latent semantic space of a set of related textual data. The semantic space of a set of textual data contains the relationship between documents and words and how they are used. Topic models are becoming…
Descriptors: Semantics, Educational Assessment, Evaluators, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiffany Berry; Brittany Hite; Michelle Sloper; Haley Umans – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The research-to-practice gap describes the well-documented phenomena of researchers and practitioners working in silos, embedded in vastly different contexts. This "cultural divide" has several causes, including ineffective collaboration, inadequate understanding of context, and insufficient dissemination and translation of research.…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Researchers, Evaluators, Coordinators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Janice Kinghorn; Katherine McGuire; Bethany L. Miller; Aaron Zimmerman – Assessment Update, 2024
In this article, the authors share their reflections on how different experiences and paradigms have broadened their understanding of the work of assessment in higher education. As they collaborated to create a panel for the 2024 International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, they recognized that they, as assessment…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Assessment Literacy, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Yicheng Sun – ProQuest LLC, 2024
We study how to automatically generate cloze questions from given texts to assess reading comprehension, where a cloze question consists of a stem with a blank space holder for the answer key, and three distractors for generating confusions. We present a generative method called CQG (Cloze Question Generator) for constructing cloze questions from…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Reading Processes, Questioning Techniques, Computational Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cristina Menescardi; Aida Carballo-Fazanes; Núria Ortega-Benavent; Isaac Estevan – Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2024
The Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA) is a valid and reliable circuit-based test of motor competence which can be used to assess children's skills in a live or recorded performance and then coded. We aimed to analyze the intrarater reliability of the CAMSA scores (total, time, and skill score) and time measured, by comparing…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluators, Scoring, Psychomotor Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nakayama, Minoru; Sciarrone, Filippo; Temperini, Marco; Uto, Masaki – International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2022
Massive open on-line courses (MOOCs) are effective and flexible resources to educate, train, and empower populations. Peer assessment (PA) provides a powerful pedagogical strategy to support educational activities and foster learners' success, also where a huge number of learners is involved. Item response theory (IRT) can model students'…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Peer Evaluation, MOOCs, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Perrin, Burt – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
When is it appropriate, and consistent with ethical standards, for evaluators to modify reports in response to "requests" from clients to do so? Some evaluators may view any pressure to make any changes in their reports as an attack on their independence. While, clearly, it is not acceptable for evaluators to be asked to distort or…
Descriptors: Reports, Change, Ethics, Evaluators
Deborah Chetcuti; Joseph Cacciottolo; Nicholas Vella – Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 2023
The award of a PhD degree is based on a rigorous examination process which is unique in that examiners can recommend that the degree is awarded subject to minor or major amendments to the thesis. In their examiner reports, examiners also include formative feedback that is intended to help the doctoral researchers improve their work. Using data…
Descriptors: Doctoral Degrees, Doctoral Students, Standards, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hyokju Maeng; Deborah R. Shapiro; Elizabeth Kipling Webster; Hyunjin Kwon – Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2023
Rater training is necessary to accurately evaluate fundamental motor skills among children with developmental disabilities (DD). The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of an online rater training program for novice raters on scoring accuracy of the run and two-hand strike skills on the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third…
Descriptors: Scoring, Accuracy, Training, Psychomotor Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Travis R. Moore; Luke Carmichael Valmadrid; Robyn Baragwanath; Nathaniel Haack; Lori Bakken – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
The ethical guidelines for the American Evaluation Association and the principles of community-based participatory evaluation both state the importance of equitable stakeholder involvement. Regardless of the evaluation approach, however, evaluators are often confronted with gatekeepers, or those who control the access to stakeholders, information,…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Evaluators, Ethics, Community Involvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Denis Dumas; James C. Kaufman – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Who should evaluate the originality and task-appropriateness of a given idea has been a perennial debate among psychologists of creativity. Here, we argue that the most relevant evaluator of a given idea depends crucially on the level of expertise of the person who generated it. To build this argument, we draw on two complimentary theoretical…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Creativity, Task Analysis, Psychologists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Reza Shahi; Hamdollah Ravand; Golam Reza Rohani – International Journal of Language Testing, 2025
The current paper intends to exploit the Many Facet Rasch Model to investigate and compare the impact of situations (items) and raters on test takers' performance on the Written Discourse Completion Test (WDCT) and Discourse Self-Assessment Tests (DSAT). In this study, the participants were 110 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students at…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yubin Xu; Lin Liu; Jianwen Xiong; Guangtian Zhu – Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2025
As the development and application of large language models (LLMs) in physics education progress, the well-known AI-based chatbot ChatGPT4 has presented numerous opportunities for educational assessment. Investigating the potential of AI tools in practical educational assessment carries profound significance. This study explored the comparative…
Descriptors: Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling; Abuzahra, Fuad – Research Evaluation, 2021
Journals that adopt open peer review (OPR), where review reports of published articles are publicly available, provide an opportunity to study both review content characteristics and quantitative aspects of the overall review process. This study investigates two areas relevant to the quality assessment of manuscript reviews. First, do journal…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Evaluation Methods
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  ...  |  211