NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 76 to 90 of 3,180 results Save | Export
Amanda Knezevich Melsby – ProQuest LLC, 2023
The teacher evaluation process has been an area of study for decades because of its complexity. Going back to one-room schoolhouses, teaching has always been an isolated profession--usually a room, a teacher, and students. Other colleagues or administrators are not participants in the classroom most of the time, which creates difficulties for…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Secondary School Teachers, School Culture
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bijani, Houman; Hashempour, Bahareh; Ibrahim, Khaled Ahmed Abdel-Al; Orabah, Salim Said Bani; Heydarnejad, Tahereh – Language Testing in Asia, 2022
Due to subjectivity in oral assessment, much concentration has been put on obtaining a satisfactory measure of consistency among raters. However, the process for obtaining more consistency might not result in valid decisions. One matter that is at the core of both reliability and validity in oral assessment is rater training. Recently,…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Language Tests, Feedback (Response), Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ilona Rinne – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
It is widely acknowledged in research that common criteria and aligned standards do not result in consistent assessment of such a complex performance as the final undergraduate thesis. Assessment is determined by examiners' understanding of rubrics and their views on thesis quality. There is still a gap in the research literature about how…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Teacher Education Programs, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Nazira Tursynbayeva; Umur Öç; Ismail Karakaya – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2024
This study aimed to measure the effect of rater training given to improve the peer assessment skills of secondary school students on rater behaviors using the many-facet Rasch Measurement model. The research employed a single-group pretest-posttest design. Since all raters scored all students, the analyses were carried out in a fully crossed (s x…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Training, Behavior, Peer Evaluation
Christopher D. Daniel – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Districts spend thousands of dollars on computerized teacher screeners without knowing if they are identifying the most effective teacher. Hiring quality staff is one of the most important job functions of a principal, and many times a teacher screener score may eliminate an effective teacher. The current study examined the value of teacher…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Scores, Screening Tests, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seth B. Hunter – Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 2024
This study's purpose is to extend our understanding of school leadership for student learning by identifying high-leverage teacher evaluation practices that improve teaching. A partnership with a state education agency administered a teacher questionnaire regarding evaluation practices multiple times in one semester, then linked teacher responses…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Instructional Improvement, Partnerships in Education, Leadership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seeber, Marco; Vlegels, Jef; Reimink, Elwin; Marusic, Ana; Pina, David G. – Research Evaluation, 2021
We have limited understanding of why reviewers tend to strongly disagree when scoring the same research proposal. Thus far, research that explored disagreement has focused on the characteristics of the proposal or the applicants, while ignoring the characteristics of the reviewers themselves. This article aims to address this gap by exploring…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability, Research Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wanzer, Dana Linnell – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
With a lack of consensus of what evaluation is within the field of evaluation, there is a difficulty in communicating to nonevaluators what evaluation is and how evaluation differs from research. To understand how evaluation is defined, both evaluators and researchers were asked how they defined evaluation and, if at all, differentiated evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Research, Differences, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nadas, Rita; Suto, Irenka; Grayson, Rebecca – Educational Research, 2021
Background: Secondary school teachers sometimes teach and assess material outside their specialisms for reasons including staff shortages or the growing popularity of the interdisciplinary courses. We hypothesised that teacher-assessors with different subject specialisms may differ in their interpretations of frequently used words in teaching and…
Descriptors: Secondary School Teachers, Language Usage, Definitions, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ping-Lin Chuang – Language Testing, 2025
This experimental study explores how source use features impact raters' judgment of argumentation in a second language (L2) integrated writing test. One hundred four experienced and novice raters were recruited to complete a rating task that simulated the scoring assignment of a local English Placement Test (EPT). Sixty written responses were…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Evaluators, Information Sources, Primary Sources
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wendler, Cathy; Glazer, Nancy; Bridgeman, Brent – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
Efficient constructed response (CR) scoring requires both accuracy and speed from human raters. This study was designed to determine if setting scoring rate expectations would encourage raters to score at a faster pace, and if so, if there would be differential effects on scoring accuracy for raters who score at different rates. Three rater groups…
Descriptors: Scoring, Expectation, Accuracy, Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jun Liu; Meng Sun; Zile Liu; Yanhua Xu – SAGE Open, 2023
Innovation capability has become a necessary requirement for qualified teachers in the context of informatization. However, the validity and objectivity of existing assessments are unclear. Therefore, this study selected nine researchers to evaluate the instructional innovation capabilities of 60 pre-service teachers from a Chinese normal…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Instructional Innovation, Competence, Item Response Theory
Vitello, Sylvia; Crisp, Victoria; Ireland, Jo – Research Matters, 2023
Assessment materials must be checked for errors before they are presented to candidates. Any errors have the potential to reduce validity. For example, in the most extreme cases, an error may turn an otherwise well-designed exam question into one that is impossible to answer. In Cambridge University Press & Assessment, assessment materials are…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Test Validity, Error Correction, Test Construction
Jessica Thomas – ProQuest LLC, 2024
The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to determine if, and to what extent, a relationship existed between teachers' perceptions of their evaluator's instructional leadership and the teachers' evaluation scores at the middle and high school levels in one Florida school district. Ozcan's theory of teacher motivation states that…
Descriptors: Secondary School Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pablo Bezem; Anne Piezunka; Rebecca Jacobsen – Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2024
In an era of test-based accountability, school inspections can offer a more nuanced understanding of why schools fail. Yet, we have limited knowledge of how inspectors arrive at their decisions on school quality. Analyzing inspectors' decision-making can reveal the underlying views regarding school accountability and open opportunities for school…
Descriptors: Inspection, Decision Making, Accountability, Institutional Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  212