NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1,831 to 1,845 of 2,843 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maier, Bruce – School Science and Mathematics, 1972
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Programs, Geometric Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clason, Robert G. – Mathematics Teacher, 1973
Descriptors: Algorithms, History, Mathematics, Mathematics Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hostetler, Robert P. – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1973
Descriptors: Algorithms, Curriculum, Elementary School Mathematics, Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kessler, Bernard M. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Algorithms, Discovery Learning, Induction, Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hamilton, E. W. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Algorithms, Arithmetic, Elementary School Mathematics, Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanic, George M. A. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1983
This response to Usiskin's editorial comment on calculator use in the May 1983 issue considers why arithmetic is taught. The belief that mathematics improves thinking and the humanist position that it is part of our cultural heritage are noted. The role of mathematics in the curriculum should be reconsidered. (MNS)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Arithmetic, Calculators, Editorials
Cardinet, Jean; Allal, Linda – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
A general framework for conducting generalizability analyses is presented. Generalizability theory is extended to situations in which the objects of measurement are not persons but other factors, such as instructional objectives, stages of learning, and treatments. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yannakoudakis, E. J.; Fawthrop, D. – Information Processing and Management, 1983
This paper describes an intelligent spelling error correction system for use in a word processing environment. The system employs a dictionary of 93,769 words and, provided the intended word is in the dictionary, it identifies 80 percent to 90 percent of spelling and typing errors. Nine references are cited. (Author/EJS)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Programs, Dictionaries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cook, Lyle; McWilliam, James – Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 1983
The problem of finding cube roots when limited to a calculator with only square root capability is discussed. An algorithm is demonstrated and explained which should always produce a good approximation within a few iterations. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Calculators, College Mathematics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathematics Teacher, 1983
The first section promotes use of student notebooks in mathematics instruction as incentives for pupils to do daily work. Part two looks at a geometric interpretation of the Euclidean algorithm. The final section examines an open box problem that is thought to appear in virtually every elementary calculus book. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Calculus, Geometric Concepts, Geometry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kolb, John R. – Mathematics Teacher, 1982
Several subtraction algorithms are analyzed to see if they involve borrowing. The main focus is on an analysis of a procedure called the residue method. The operational arithmetic which underlies the symbolic manipulations is examined and conditions where the method does and does not use borrowing are highlighted. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Arithmetic, Computation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slesnick, Twila – Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1982
The hypothesis investigated is that understanding of the long division algorithm requires a higher cognitive level than understanding of fundamental division concepts. Sixth-grade children were tested on performance and understanding of a given algorithm and concepts of division. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Division
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robitaille, David F.; Sherrill, James M. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1981
Data indicated that high percentages of fifth- through eighth-grade low achievers had high algorithm confidence for the operations of addition, subtraction, and multiplication. A substantial proportion in each grade expressed a low degree of confidence in their computational method for division. (CM)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Computation, Confidence Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leutzinger, Larry P.; Nelson, Glenn – Arithmetic Teacher, 1980
Some techniques for developing the ability to multiply and divide by powers of ten with ease and understanding are presented. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Activities, Algorithms, Division, Elementary Education
Bennedbek, Birgitte – Mathematics Teaching, 1981
A process for helping students in the elementary grades develop their own algorithms for subtraction with carrying is described. Pupils choose their own times and ways to move from manipulative materials to written notation. (MP)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Arithmetic, Computation, Elementary Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  119  |  120  |  121  |  122  |  123  |  124  |  125  |  126  |  127  |  ...  |  190