Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 56 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 320 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 838 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1780 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 328 |
| Teachers | 266 |
| Researchers | 135 |
| Administrators | 79 |
| Parents | 29 |
| Policymakers | 26 |
| Students | 16 |
| Counselors | 6 |
| Community | 5 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
Location
| China | 84 |
| Canada | 80 |
| Australia | 60 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 55 |
| United States | 53 |
| United Kingdom | 52 |
| Indonesia | 51 |
| California | 37 |
| Netherlands | 35 |
| Turkey | 32 |
| Sweden | 29 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedEnright, Robert D.; Lapsley, Daniel K. – Child Development, 1981
Examined judgments of intolerance given by children, adolescents, and adults toward disagreeing others. The evidence suggested that intolerance may be a lower level of reasoning in a social cognitive developmental progression. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Adults, Age Differences, Children
Berkowitz, Marvin W. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1981
Recent findings in studies of moral education indicate that "plus-one" teachers, who function as discussion leaders and pitch moral arguments one stage above the majority of the class, are not necessary for students' moral growth. Teachers should be viewed as models and facilitators rather than producers of moral reasoning. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Moral Development, Moral Values, Peer Teaching
Peer reviewedGreen, Thomas G. – Journal of Dental Education, 1981
Differences in approach to three hypothetical dental moral dilemmas were found among dental students, but the differences were strongest in the early years of dental education, before significant patient contact. Freshmen rated principled reasons higher than older students. Further research into causes and actual behavior is recommended. (MSE)
Descriptors: Dental Schools, Higher Education, Integrity, Moral Development
Peer reviewedKehoe, John W.; Rogers, W. Todd – Canadian Journal of Education, 1978
This study investigated the relative effectiveness of principle testing discussion (PTD) and its possible interaction with moral development levels in students' demonstrations of positive attitudes toward women, the physically handicapped, and East Indians. Analysis of attitude scale responses provided equivocal support for the use of PTD.…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Developmental Stages, Discussion, Grade 9
Peer reviewedEdwards, J. B. – Journal of Moral Education, 1979
Six hundred adolescents and 25 teachers responded to incidents containing a moral issue. Overall there was moral development with age, as suggested by Piaget, but many (by Piaget's definitions) immature responses were recorded on some incidents, even by adults. The context in which issues were presented was an important influence. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Developmental Stages, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedEnright, Robert D.; Hendel, Darwin D. – Journal of Moral Education, 1979
This study examined the moral growth effects on 18 college students of year-long participation in ACTION, a volunteer antipoverty program. While scores on the Defining Issues Test did not indicate increased moral growth, students generally viewed their agency learning experience more positively than their university classes. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: College Students, Community Services, Field Experience Programs, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRybash, John M.; And Others – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1981
College students were divided into four groups and administered the standard version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT) and/or a self-orientation version of the same instrument. Subjects displayed greater amounts of principled moral reasoning when responding to the standard (other-orientation) version. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, College Students, High School Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedOlejnik, Anthony B. – Child Development, 1980
Investigated the interrelationships among young adults' levels of moral reasoning, their preferred discipline style, and the way they say they would reason with children on moral issues. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Child Rearing, Codes of Ethics, College Students, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewedSawin, Douglas B.; Parke, Ross D. – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1980
Descriptors: Age Differences, Antisocial Behavior, Discipline, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedEnright, Robert D.; Sutterfield, Sara J. – Child Development, 1980
Two classrooms of first graders (N=40) were administered Damon's moral judgment measure, Shure and Spivack's social problem solving measure, and the Stanford-Binet vocabulary. Concurrently, two observers in the children's school environment recorded incidences of successful resolutions of interactions, amount of derogation, and the number of times…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Conflict Resolution, Elementary School Students, Moral Development
Whiteley, John M.; And Others – New Directions for Higher Education, 1980
Although research on the moral development of college students is in its infancy, recent findings indicate promise for future study and institutional action. The theory of moral development is described from a cognitive developmental perspective, and research on improving thinking about justice and fairness at the college level is examined.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, College Role, College Students, Educational Research
Fincher, Cameron – New Directions for Higher Education, 1980
Efforts to deal with a continuing crisis in sociological values must involve the best that education, the humanities, and the behavioral sciences can offer. (Author)
Descriptors: College Role, Ethical Instruction, Futures (of Society), Higher Education
Rosenblatt, Howard S.; And Others – Southern Journal of Educational Research, 1980
Compared to a peer group of average abilities, gifted and talented junior high school students appeared more outgoing, participating, insightful, fast-learning, intellectually adaptable, conscientious, persistent, and moralistic, thus indicating significant between-group differences. (SB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Comparative Analysis, Exceptional Child Research, Gifted
Peer reviewedBar-Yam, Miriam; And Others – American Journal of Education, 1980
Kohlberg's moral dilemmas were used to determine levels of moral reasoning among 115 adolescents representing urban middle class and lower class, kibbutz-born and Youth Aliyah (disadvantaged urban youth educated in the kibbutz), Moslem and Christian groups in Israel. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences, Educational Environment
Peer reviewedEyler, Janet – Theory and Research in Social Education, 1980
Describes a study undertaken to determine why citizens who endorse democratic procedural norms in the abstract are unable to apply these norms to unpopular groups or actions. Findings indicated that principled thinkers surpass nonprincipled thinkers in applying democratic principles and that educators should work to facilitate development of civic…
Descriptors: Citizen Participation, Citizenship Education, Citizenship Responsibility, Conflict

Direct link
