NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 2,356 to 2,370 of 5,701 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lai, Yi-hsiu – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2010
The purpose of this study was to investigate problems and potentials of new technologies in English writing education. The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation (AWE) ("MY Access") and of peer evaluation (PE) was compared. Twenty-two English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Taiwan participated in this study. They submitted…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jie, Gao; Lederman, Marie Jean – Journal of Basic Writing, 1988
Describes, via a dialogic format, background and current practices in teaching and assessing writing in secondary schools in the People's Republic of China, as well as issues involved in assessing student writing on the current national university examinations. Suggests comparisons with similar issues and practices in the United States. (SR)
Descriptors: Chinese Culture, Secondary Education, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Arthur B. – Business Education Forum, 1984
Describes the use of WordStar, Grammatik, and Proofreader software packages to evaluate students' writing in a business communications course. Shows how spelling and selected prose characteristics can be evaluated by computer. (SK)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Computer Software, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raymond, James C. – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Discusses the lack of professional agreement as to which components of writing should be evaluated and how. Offers eight suggestions as guidelines for writing evaluation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Deno, Stanley L.; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1982
Among the scoring procedures investigated, Total Words Written, Words Spelled Correctly, Correct Letter Sequences, and Mature Words most strongly and consistently related to the criterion measures. (DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Test Validity, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jonz, Jon – Journal of Basic Writing, 1987
Describes a technique to create, administer, and monitor valid and reliable measures of basic students' writing skills. Shows how the test, requiring students to read a stimulus passage and prepare a written response, uses judgments of experienced language teachers to measure students' writing proficiency. Includes a sample exit-test prompt. (MM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Test Construction, Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sommers, Jeffrey; And Others – WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1993
Claims that portfolios can be reliably rated in a large-scale assessment situation. Shares the experiences of writing program administrators concerning portfolio assessment. Outlines practical methods of gaining reasonable reliability in portfolio scoring. (RS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Portfolios (Background Materials), Reliability, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Licklider, Mary M. – English Journal, 1992
Describes the difficulties in assessing writing improvement in high school students based on national reports. Discovers that students' fluency, their use of dialogue, and their ease in moving between the abstract and the concrete is increasing. Suggests the resources of the National Assessment of Educational Progress might yield the information…
Descriptors: Secondary Education, Writing Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Writing Research
Padgett, Ron – Teachers and Writers, 1993
Discusses the dilemmas of evaluating and assessing students' poetry. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Poetry, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mahon, Robert L. – Clearing House, 2005
One minor but irritating problem that most composition teachers face--especially those who handle masses of papers at the high school level--involves coming up with a method of grading that is demonstrably objective but not so rigid that it allows no room for judgment. The author proposes a hybrid grading system: combining numbers and letters. The…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Numbers, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anthony, Jared Judd – Assessing Writing, 2009
Testing the hypotheses that reflective timed-essay prompts should elicit memories of meaningful experiences in students' undergraduate education, and that computer-mediated classroom experiences should be salient among those memories, a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods paints a richer, more complex picture than either…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Qualitative Research, Research Methodology, Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petersen, Jerry – Assessing Writing, 2009
Large-scale writing programs can add value to the traditional timed writing assessment by using aspects of the essays to assess the effectiveness of institutional goals, programs, and curriculums. The "six learning goals" prompt in this study represents an attempt to provide an accurate writing assessment that moves beyond scores. This…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Writing Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu, Han – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2008
To teach students how to write for the workplace and other professional contexts, technical writing teachers often assign writing tasks that reflect real-life communication contexts, a teaching approach that is grounded in the field's contextualized understanding of genre. This article argues to fully embrace contextualized literacy and better…
Descriptors: Technical Writing, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Writing Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whithaus, Carl; Harrison, Scott B.; Midyette, Jeb – Assessing Writing, 2008
This article examines the influence of keyboarding versus handwriting in a high-stakes writing assessment. Conclusions are based on data collected from a pilot project to move Old Dominion University's Exit Exam of Writing Proficiency from a handwritten format into a dual-option format (i.e., the students may choose to handwrite or keyboard the…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Handwriting, Pilot Projects, Writing Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Chi-Fen Emily; Cheng, Wei-Yuan Eugene – Language Learning & Technology, 2008
Automated writing evaluation (AWE) software is designed to provide instant computer-generated scores for a submitted essay along with diagnostic feedback. Most studies on AWE have been conducted on psychometric evaluations of its validity; however, studies on how effectively AWE is used in writing classes as a pedagogical tool are limited. This…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Instructional Effectiveness, Foreign Countries
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  154  |  155  |  156  |  157  |  158  |  159  |  160  |  161  |  162  |  ...  |  381