Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 241 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1573 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4628 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 12045 |
Descriptor
| Factor Analysis | 18010 |
| Foreign Countries | 6668 |
| Correlation | 3907 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 3353 |
| Factor Structure | 3344 |
| Questionnaires | 3236 |
| Statistical Analysis | 3143 |
| Test Validity | 2941 |
| Student Attitudes | 2821 |
| Psychometrics | 2405 |
| Test Reliability | 2301 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 276 |
| Practitioners | 85 |
| Teachers | 51 |
| Administrators | 40 |
| Policymakers | 22 |
| Counselors | 18 |
| Students | 16 |
| Parents | 3 |
| Community | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 1093 |
| China | 451 |
| Australia | 423 |
| United States | 300 |
| Taiwan | 287 |
| Canada | 286 |
| Hong Kong | 228 |
| Spain | 226 |
| Germany | 206 |
| South Korea | 203 |
| Netherlands | 198 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 6 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 7 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedMeyer, Edward P. – Psychometrika, 1973
It is shown that, under very general conditions, uniqueness estimates proposed independently by Guttman (1957) and by Harris (1963) provide tighter upper bounds on the unknown uniqueness values of factor analysis than do existing estimates. (Editor)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Psychometrics
Peer reviewedMeyer, Edward P. – Psychometrika, 1973
This paper made an important distinction between determinacy of common-factors and determinacy of unique-factors and examined the implications of two results previously obtained by Guttman. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Psychometrics
Peer reviewedHarris, David R.; Woodward, J. Arthur – Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedKogan, Nathan – British Journal of Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedHarker, R. K. – Educational Research, 1971
The differences in concept formation skills between middle and working class children in New Zealand are discussed. (CK)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Social Influences
Applebee, Bernice L.; And Others – Illinois School Research, 1971
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Team Teaching
Hefele, Thomas J.; and others – J Clin Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Rock, Donald A.; Dynarski, Barbara – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedKiers, Henk A. L.; Ten Berge, Jos M. F.; Rocci, Roberto – Psychometrika, 1997
Three-mode factor analysis (3MFA) and PARAFAC are methods that describe three-way data. A class of 3MFA models is introduced that falls between 3MFA and PARAFAC and contains the good properties of both approaches, including the unique axes property that has distinguished the PARAFAC model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedLorenzo-Seva, Urbano – Psychometrika, 2003
Proposes an index for assessing the degree of factor simplicity in the context of principal components and exploratory factor analysis. The index does not depend on the scale of the factors, and its maximum and minimum are related only to the degree of simplicity in the loading matrix. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedGessaroli, Marc E.; Folske, Jane C. – International Journal of Testing, 2002
Developed a general framework to estimate total test or testlet reliability with either fixed or random factors that is based on hierarchical factor analysis. Illustrates the framework with an example based on real data. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Reliability
Peer reviewedFung, W. K.; Kwan, C. W. – Psychometrika, 1995
Influence curves of some parameters under various methods of factor analysis depend on the influence curves for either the covariance or the correlation matrix used in the analysis. The differences between the two types of curves are derived, and simple formulas for the differences are presented. (SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Matrices
Peer reviewedHayashi, Kentaro; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychometrika, 2000
Investigated the conditions under which the matrix of factor loadings from the factor analysis model with equal unique variances will give a good approximation to the matrix of factor loadings from the regular factor analysis model. Extends the results to the image factor analysis model. Discusses implications for practice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewedKwan, C. W.; Fung, W. K. – Psychometrika, 1998
General formulas are derived for assessing local influence under restrictions in which the first derivatives are still zeros, and then these results are applied to factor analysis, as the usually used restriction in factor analysis satisfies the conditions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedFilzmoser, Peter – Psychometrika, 2000
Presents an approach for obtaining principal planes in factor analysis, extending the idea of rotation to simple structure to two dimensions. The principal planes give a better view of the data than planes derived from classical rotation and thus allow more reliable interpretation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Orthogonal Rotation


