Publication Date
| In 2026 | 8 |
| Since 2025 | 160 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 857 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2208 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5562 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Ackerman, Brian P. | 21 |
| Lancioni, Giulio E. | 13 |
| McDonough, Kim | 13 |
| Aslin, Richard N. | 12 |
| Logan, Gordon D. | 12 |
| Mou, Weimin | 12 |
| O'Reilly, Mark F. | 12 |
| Paas, Fred | 12 |
| Tomasello, Michael | 12 |
| Sigafoos, Jeff | 11 |
| Smith, Linda B. | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 156 |
| Researchers | 112 |
| Practitioners | 93 |
| Parents | 9 |
| Students | 6 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Administrators | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Germany | 111 |
| Canada | 98 |
| Australia | 94 |
| China | 88 |
| United Kingdom | 81 |
| Netherlands | 69 |
| California | 57 |
| Japan | 50 |
| Spain | 46 |
| Israel | 43 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 40 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 6 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 10 |
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedBohart, Arthur C.; And Others – Social Behavior and Personality, 1977
Authors hypothesized client's self-perception of improvement in therapy is partially a function of situational cues in contrast to internal mechanisms. Undergraduate Ss (N=65) self-disclosed on a problem for 10 minutes and were then assigned to one of four "interpersonal cue" conditions, or to a "discharge cue" condition. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Counseling, Counselor Characteristics, Cues
Peer reviewedHecht, Lawrence W. – Journal of Educational Research, 1978
Student behavior measures were shown to be highly predictive of achievement, adding support to the notion that student behavior during instruction is strongly linked to student learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Attention Span, Cues, Learning
Peer reviewedDoctorow, Marleen; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978
In the generative model of learning with understanding, reading comprehension occurs when readers actively construct meaning for text. On two experiments with 488 sixth graders, learning time was held constant across all treatments. The combination of inserted paragraph headings and instructions to generate sentences about paragraphs approximately…
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Cues, Decoding (Reading), Grade 6
Bjork, Robert A.; Geiselman, Ralph E. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978
Three experiments were designed to clarify the perplexing ability of subjects to discriminate between to-be-remembered (T BR) and to-be-forgotten (TBF) items in memory. Results implicate within-list retrieval of TBR items as a potent tagging or strengthening operation that provides a basis on which those items may later be discriminated from TBF…
Descriptors: Cues, Experimental Psychology, Experiments, Flow Charts
Peer reviewedAnderson, Elaine J. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978
Investigates the effects of combined learning cues (pretest and behavioral objectives) on the achievement levels of teachers in an inservice course. Subjects receiving the combined learning cues did not achieve at a significantly higher level than did those who did not receive the combined learning cues. (CP)
Descriptors: Achievement, Behavioral Objectives, Cues, Educational Research
Peer reviewedRussell, Richard K.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976
Test-anxious subjects (N=19) participated in an outcome study comparing systematic desensitization, cue-controlled relaxation, and no treatment. The treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement on the self-report measures of test and state anxiety but not on the behavioral indices. The potential advantages of this technique over…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Behavior Change, College Students, Cues
Peer reviewedSmeets, Paul M.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1988
Three studies involving groups of four- to five-year-old children examined whether the discriminative properties of prompts are critical for establishing a difficult (septagon, octagon) discrimination through time delay. Results confirm superiority of multiple-stimulus, distinctive-feature prompts, implying that stimulus dimensions of prompts are…
Descriptors: Cues, Discrimination Learning, Programed Instruction, Responses
Peer reviewedCampbell, Toni A.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1987
Children viewed televised messages with identical content that were presented in either child or adult program forms and at three levels of difficulty. Visual attention was significantly greater for messages in child forms, but showed minor variation according to content difficulty. Recall scores were higher for child forms and for easy versions.…
Descriptors: Cues, Educational Television, Kindergarten Children, Production Techniques
Peer reviewedPearl, Ruth – Child Development, 1985
Examined developmental changes in children's recognition that help is needed. Four- and 9-year-olds were shown a series of videotaped vignettes of two child actors, one of whom experienced a problem because he lacked a necessary skill or was physically unable to complete a task. (Author/BE)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cues, Grade 3, Helping Relationship
Ragan, Janet M.; Ragan, Tillman J. – Journal of Visual/Verbal Languaging, 1982
Briefly summarizes history of neurolinguistic programing, which set out to model elements and processes of effective communication and to reduce these to formulas that can be taught to others. Potential areas of inquiry for neurolinguistic programers which should be of concern to visual literacists are discussed. (MBR)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Communication Skills, Cues, Eye Movements
Peer reviewedRowe, Deborah W. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
The inclusion of "purpose questions" before passages in reading comprehension tests is evaluated in light of recent research related to schema theory and adjunct questions. While research supports the use of purpose questions, gaps and weaknesses in the available data exist. Suggestions for further study are provided. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Cues, Learning Processes, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewedThieman, Thomas J. – Teaching of Psychology, 1984
The encoding specificity principle asserts that a retrieval cue will be effective if, and only if, the to-be-remembered item was specifically encoded with respect to that cue during input. Describes a classroom experiment that provides an opportunity to demonstrate the encoding specificity phenomenon, note its limitations, and discuss its cause…
Descriptors: Course Descriptions, Cues, Educational Experiments, Higher Education
Peer reviewedSims, Edward V., Jr.; Weisberg, Paul – Journal of Educational Research, 1984
Page prompts and beginning handwriting legibility were examined in a study of handwriting and teacher ratings of writing legibility. The relation of letter prompting to legibility was found to be dependent on the measure of legibility used. (Author/DF)
Descriptors: Cues, Elementary Education, Grade 2, Handwriting
Peer reviewedKiewra, Kenneth A. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1983
No differences in immediate recognition performance were found for 30 undergraduate students who reorganized notes into an instructor-generated matrix versus subjects who reviewed in their typical manner. Reorganization during review resulted in relatively higher achievement on a free recall test, while unstructured review produced higher…
Descriptors: Cues, Encoding (Psychology), Higher Education, Notetaking
Peer reviewedRunquist, Willard N.; Maki, Judith – American Journal of Psychology, 1976
When subjects learned paired associates that, on the study trials, consisted of a stimulus (cue) and its correct (target) response plus two other (distractor) responses from within the list, the presence of the distractor items interfered with learning, especially when overtly pronounced as opposed to silently studied. (Editor)
Descriptors: Cues, Experiments, Information Processing, Learning Processes


