Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 121 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 611 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1638 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4082 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 571 |
| Teachers | 359 |
| Researchers | 136 |
| Administrators | 119 |
| Students | 51 |
| Policymakers | 47 |
| Counselors | 31 |
| Community | 24 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 207 |
| Canada | 190 |
| United Kingdom | 163 |
| United States | 117 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 106 |
| California | 97 |
| Netherlands | 76 |
| China | 69 |
| Sweden | 68 |
| Taiwan | 65 |
| Israel | 64 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 3 |
Peer reviewedFisher, B. Aubrey; Stutman, Randall K. – Communication Quarterly, 1987
Investigates the nature of breakpoints, or the introduction of new topics, as they occur in group decision making processes. Defines breakpoints, analyzes the utility of the concept of breakpoints in group discussion, and offers tentative conclusions about the nature of group interaction. (SRT)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewedSchwab, Reiko – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1986
Discusses support groups for the bereaved: their organization, function, processes, role of professionals, and the use of such groups for professional training. (Author)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Death, Grief, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedParrillo, Vincent N.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Suggests that quasi-theories may link symbolic interactionism and negotiated order theory. The proposal theory is grounded in a case study of a university sabbatical leave committee. Situational response is explained in regard to the microsocial processes of cure selection and cure justification, rather than relying on macrosocial issues.…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Faculty, Group Dynamics, Participative Decision Making
Peer reviewedFisher, B. Aubrey – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Examines what we know and don't know about group leadership and concludes that current metaphors which guide inquiry into leadership are incapable of dealing with the complexity inherent in the phenomenon. Describes and adapts an alternative metaphor, leader as medium, to group communication as relationships. (BH)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Group Dynamics, Interpersonal Communication, Leadership Qualities
Peer reviewedWendorf, Donald J.; And Others – Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1985
Charts the development of the Family Therapy Consortium, a group that provides supervision and continuing education in family therapy and explores the peer supervision process at work in the consortium. The focus is on individual and group development, which are seen as complementary aspects of the same growth process. (Author/NRB)
Descriptors: Counselor Training, Group Dynamics, Individual Development, Organizations (Groups)
Peer reviewedFreishlag, Jerry – Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 1985
A recent survey of coaches ranks team cohesion as the most critical problem coaches face. Optimal interpersonal relationships among athletes and their coaches can maximize collective performance. Team dynamics are discussed and coaching tips are provided. (MT)
Descriptors: Athletic Coaches, Group Dynamics, Group Unity, Interpersonal Communication
Peer reviewedGordon, Haim – Educational Theory, 1985
Philosophers of education tend to stress the importance of analytic and scientific thinking. A discussion of how dialectical reasoning, as developed by Jean Paul Sartre, can contribute to educational thought is offered. (DF)
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Coping, Educational Philosophy, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedRoark, Albert E.; Radl, Myrna C. – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1984
Identifies components of group process and describes leader functions. Discusses personal elements, focus of interaction/psychological distance, group development, content, quality of interaction, and self-reflective/meaning attribution, illustrated by a case study of a group of persons (N=5) arrested for drunk driving. (JAC)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedHenry, George H. – English Education, 1984
Discusses problems associated with NCTE's Conference on English Education and recommends ways to improve the organization. (FL)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, English Teacher Education, Group Dynamics, Professional Development
Peer reviewedLang, Harry G.; And Others – American Annals of the Deaf, 1984
Communication among hearing and hearing impaired professionals can be improved by attention to preparation factors (such as careful consideration of the arrangement of the meeting room), aspects of the conduct of the meeting (including discouraging side conversations), and wise use of interpreters. (CL)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Deaf Interpreting, Group Activities, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedJuda, Daniel P. – Journal of Offender Counseling, Services & Rehabilitation, 1983
Describes attempts to form a communication group among male and female inmates. The failure of this effort is discussed with emphasis on the special problems and needs of groups in prisons and the lack of insight among the institution's administration and staff. (JAC)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Correctional Institutions, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Pankowski, Mary L. – New Directions for Continuing Education, 1984
Reviews research on group problem solving and offers suggestions for improving participation and task accomplishment in the workshop format. (JOW)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Participation, Participative Decision Making, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedGruner, LeRoy – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Contrasts open and closed therapeutic groups in the context of group development research, and reanalyzes data applying the Hill Interaction Matrix. Results supported the existence of a discernable process of development in the closed groups, while open groups with residual members showed counterproductive activity. (LLL)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Counselors, Group Dynamics, Group Membership
Peer reviewedHammond, Doris B.; Bonney, Warren C. – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1983
Describes a counseling group comprised of people concerned with elderly family members. Group members found both information and emotional support, and all suggested that the group be continued. Challenges counselors to meet the need for similar groups. (JAC)
Descriptors: Family Relationship, Gerontology, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics
Are Funny Groups Good at Solving Problems? A Methodological Evaluation and Some Preliminary Results.
Peer reviewedPollio, Howard R.; Bainum, Charlene Kubo – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Observed college students (N=195) divided according to sex and measures of wittiness to determine the effects of humor on problem solving in groups. Results showed that group composition was not a crucial issue in problem-solving performance, but that humerous group interaction was, and did not interfere with ongoing task performance. (LLL)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Humor


