Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 452 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2598 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5873 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13995 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
A leader in the field of educational evaluation discusses her views on: (1) research utilization; (2) concepts of "knowledge creep" and "decision accretion"; (3) allegation that evaluation is used to legitimate a decision maker's previously determined course of action; and (4) the importance of validity and utility in evaluation. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Interviews, Program Evaluation, Research Utilization
Peer reviewedWilson, James W. – Journal of Cooperative Education, 1980
Proposes an ethical principle to guide evaluators of cooperative education programs: that all actions of the evaluator contribute to a competent, fair, and useful assessment. Applies this principle to each element of the evaluation process. (SK)
Descriptors: Cooperative Education, Ethics, Evaluators, Objectivity
Peer reviewedNicholas, John M. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1979
Suggests that meaningful evaluation requires a pre-evaluation design that assures evaluators and decision-makers that they know what they want from an evaluation and that they are able to get unambiguous and useful information, and that methodological and logistical problems of evaluation be considered at the outset. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Organizational Change, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedNadler, Barbara; Shore, Kenneth – Education, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Model (recently used by the Bureau for the Education of the Handicapped to investigate feasibility of implementing the Individual Education Program component of PL 94-142) is described in terms of its application in the State of New Jersey. Limitations and potentials are discussed. (JC)
Descriptors: Educational Programs, Feasibility Studies, Models, Program Evaluation
Brown, Andrew J. – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1977
The most desirable outcome of any patient education program is a patient who is aware of medical alternatives and their potential effects and who chooses voluntarily and intelligently whether or not to follow medical advice. (MM)
Descriptors: Health Education, Patient Education, Patients, Program Evaluation
Veneri, Carolyn M. – Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 1997
The evaluation of the 1984-95 occupational employment projections can determine the reliability of information based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) track record and enable BLS to improve the accuracy of its subsequent projections. (JOW)
Descriptors: Employment Projections, Program Evaluation, Reliability, Tables (Data)
Peer reviewedCarliner, Saul – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1997
Contends that D.L. Kirkpatrick's model for evaluating training courses can be adapted to evaluating products and services. Outlines how this can be done. States that measuring client and user satisfaction and performance can provide proof of technical communication's quality and value. (PA)
Descriptors: Credibility, Evaluation Criteria, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedVoakes, Les – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Describes a partnership of youth and adults in Ontario, Canada in the generative process of participatory evaluation as youth and adults jointly produced a conference as a participatory evaluation and worked as democratic equals toward a common goal. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedGreenberg, David; Meyer, Robert; Michalopoulos, Charles; Wiseman, Michael – Evaluation Review, 2003
Used findings from the evaluations of California's Greater Avenues for Independence program and the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies to illustrate why it is important to question the legitimacy of such syntheses. Results show how tempting generalizations are not justified. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Synthesis, Welfare Recipients
Peer reviewedHeckman, James – Journal of Human Resources, 1997
Considers the use of instrumental variables to estimate effects of treatments on treated and randomly selected groups. Concludes that instrumental variable methods are extremely sensitive to assumptions about how people process information. (SK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Econometrics, Program Evaluation, Research Problems
Peer reviewedAbma A., Tineke; Stake, Robert E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2001
Setting the context for this theme issue on responsive evaluation, this article describes the core ideas of Robert Stake's responsive evaluation, presenting them as originally framed and discussing their evolution over time. Explains that the rhetoric and ethic of responsive evaluation is to be open, to find more than the initial issues. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Philosophy, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedShadish, William – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 1999
Illustrates the basic and theoretical issues in evaluation with which aspiring evaluators should be familiar to claim they know the knowledge base of the profession. The issues are discussed in question and answer format. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluators, Knowledge Level, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedStockdill, Stacey Hueftle; Baizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Presents a vocabulary of the evaluation capacity building (ECB) field and reviews the relatively small ECB literature and what it teaches for evaluation practice. Introduces the other chapters of this special issue on ECB. (SLD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedBaizerman, Michael; Compton, Donald W.; Stockdill, Stacey Hueftle – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Summarizes and analyzes the four case studies of this theme issue. The analyses consider the three structural elements of evaluation capacity building (ECB): overall ECB process; actual ECB practices; and ECB occupational orientation and practitioner role. Provides a practical checklist for assessing ECB at an organization and a framework for…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMabry, Linda – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses postmodernism as a complicated concept. The postmodern challenge to social science, particularly to program evaluation, and its contribution to evaluation are the subjects of vignettes from practice and a limited exploration, one that borrows from a playfully absurdist postmodern style. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Postmodernism, Program Evaluation, Social Sciences


