Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 452 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2598 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5873 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13995 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Amine, Rayyan; Fourqurean, John – School Business Affairs, 2003
Describes evaluation process based on principles of continuous improvement and quality management established by the superintendent of Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District in Texas. (PKP)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Program Evaluation, Total Quality Management
Peer reviewedCurcio, Claire Cole; Mathai, Christina; Roberts, Jane – Professional School Counseling, 2003
Presents an evaluation of a secondary counseling program of a school district. Discusses steps involved in planning the evaluation and an analysis of counselor interviews, counselor log sheet data, principal interviews and parent focused group interviews. (Contains 20 references.) (GCP)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, School Counseling, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedAl-Athari, Ahmad; Zairi, Mohamed – Journal of European Industrial Training, 2002
A study of training evaluation activity and challenges in 77 Kuwaiti organizations found that most respondents evaluate their programs only occasionally through the use of questionnaires. Most use the Kilpatrick model for evaluation and the most common level of evaluation is reaction type. (Contains 24 references.) (JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMilstein, Bobby; Chapel, Thomas J.; Wetterhall, Scott F.; Cotton, David A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Summarizes efforts to strengthen program evaluation capacity at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reviews the circumstances that triggered an interest in building this capacity in public health and the principles and procedures used by the working group charged to achieve this goal. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Public Health
Peer reviewedMcHardy, Joan – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2002
Discusses this era of transition in program evaluation, which is marked by growing cooperation between government and civil society, and suggests participatory program evaluation as an approach to lessen undue influence by any one partner and promote a positive culture of evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Partnerships in Education, Planning, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMackay, Ronald; Horton, Douglas; Dupleich, Luis; Andersen, Anders – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2002
Describes the conceptual frameworks and methods used to evaluate a multisite, regional capacity-development project in Latin America and the Caribbean. Discusses the challenges facing capacity development and its evaluation and illustrates some of the procedures used. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Organizational Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedCook, Thomas D. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002
Discusses reasons randomized experiments in educational research have been so rare and appraises alternatives to experiments that educational evaluators prefer. These alternatives are found wanting whenever a high standard is needed for justifying causal conclusions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedFredericks, Kimberly A.; Carman, Joanne G.; Birkland, Thomas A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Outlines the major intergovernmental and interorganizational challenges associated with doing program evaluation in today's environment and offers recommendations designed to improve evaluation efforts. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Government Role, Program Evaluation, Public Agencies
Peer reviewedSanders, James R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Proposes a multifaceted approach to making evaluation a part of organizational culture. The approach includes using allies, examples, models, research, process guides, and trainers/developers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Organizational Culture, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedPatton, Michael Quinn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses teaching and training about evaluation with metaphors. Helping those who study evaluation perceive analogies and metaphors related to evaluation helps them understand truths about the rich diversity of evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Metaphors, Program Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedWisely, D. Susan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses four reasons why progress in evaluation in private foundations has been so slow and intermittent. These include: (1) inflated claims for the power of evaluation as a guide; (2) foundations' distance from the consequences of their actions; (3) sensitivity to hostile criticism and the difficulties of learning from legitimate criticism; and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Philanthropic Foundations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMorris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Comments on two articles related to ethical challenges in evaluation and a series of articles on the subject published in the "American Journal of Evaluation" between 1998 and 2001. Considers the problems of ethical challenges in the context of principles and standards for evaluation developed by professional associations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedChamings, Patricia A.; And Others – Nursing Outlook, 1990
In the latest survey of nursing school deans and nursing researchers, 280 of the nation's 467 accredited schools of nursing were named as being among the best at least once. The University of Washington's School of Nursing was ranked number one for the second consecutive time. (JOW)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Higher Education, Nursing Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLapine, Louise – Evaluation Practice, 1987
The use of the Nominal Group Technique to identify areas for formative evaluation is described. Group characteristics, pertinent group questions, and advantages of the method are outlined. The process depersonalizes results, puts individual concerns into perspective, and focuses on improving the program (not on blaming or evaluating personnel).…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Formative Evaluation, Group Discussion, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLucas, Stephen; And Others – Journal of Education for Business, 1989
Describes a methodology to facilitate the evaluation of secondary marketing education (ME) programs. Compares the status of ME programs at the national level with a set of national program standards. Also compares the ME program in a selected state with the same standards. (JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Marketing, Program Evaluation, Secondary Education


