Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 172 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 783 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1644 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2454 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 147 |
| China | 129 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| Indonesia | 45 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Norman, Rose; Young, Marynell – Technical Writing Teacher, 1985
Presents a sequence of assignments that provides an inductive method for preparing students to write a formal proposal by imitating the grant review and proposal process. Describes the process and results of peer review of the resulting proposals.(HTH)
Descriptors: Grants, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Program Proposals
Peer reviewedFischer, Olga Howard; Fischer, Chester A. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Relates how a microcomputer with word processing capabilities can facilitate and enrich a student's writing. (HOD)
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Higher Education, Microcomputers, Prewriting
Peer reviewedZamel, Vivian – TESOL Quarterly, 1985
Describes a study that examines the responses of teachers of English as a second language (ESL) to student writing. Results show that the ESL teachers misread student texts, are inconsistent in their reactions, make arbitrary comments and corrections, impose abstract rules and standards, and rarely offer specific strategies for revising the test.…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Error Analysis (Language), Higher Education, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedMcKensie, Lee; Tomkins, Gail E. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1984
Demonstrates how an integrated approach toward writing evaluation works at each stage of the writing process and presents a checklist teachers can use to assess whether their students use specific behaviors of the writing process as they compose. (FL)
Descriptors: Educational Theories, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Integrated Activities
Peer reviewedJobst, Jack – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1984
Describes how microcomputers can assist in grading the work of beginning writers, especially repetitive errors, and how students respond to this practice. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Content Area Writing, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading
Peer reviewedBrown, Rexford – English Education, 1984
Offers personal reflections on the testing of writing, concluding that teachers make wide and effective use of a variety of test types. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Norm Referenced Tests, Standardized Tests, Teacher Made Tests
Peer reviewedPurves, Alan C. – College Composition and Communication, 1984
Describes a replication of a study to determine what international writers and evaluators bring to their respective tasks in an effort to devise an international scoring scheme. A satisfactory list of rating criteria was developed, although the criteria were value-laden and thus embedded in a cultural context. (HTH)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Cultural Influences, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Peer reviewedRoemer, Kenneth M. – College English, 1984
Advocates modeling as an appropriate approach to teaching composition, provided teachers select models carefully and present them as paradigms of dynamic processes and as hints leading to avenues of discovery. Uses N. Scott Momaday's "The Way to Rainy Mountain" to illustrate how such a model can be used to assist student invention. (RBW)
Descriptors: College English, Higher Education, Models, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewedComber, Barbara – English in Australia, 1983
Provides a description of how nongraded, descriptive assessment works in responding to the written assignments of some postgraduate students. (HOD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Nongraded Student Evaluation
Brown, Jane Lightcap – Curriculum Review, 1984
Advantages of peer evaluation of writing are outlined, questions that arise once instructors decide to use this method are presented, and steps to develop students' awareness of what to look for and what to say about the writing of peers in English composition and other disciplines are discussed. (MBR)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education, Student Writing Models
Peer reviewedFahnestock, Jeanne – College Composition and Communication, 1983
Examines coherence between sentences in a paragraph, arguing that readers require coherence at this level as well as between paragraphs. Discusses continuative and discontinuative relationships between sentences, including (1) sequence, (2) exemplification, (3) addition, (4) replacement, (5) contrast, and (6) alternation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Coherence, Cohesion (Written Composition), Higher Education, Paragraph Composition
Peer reviewedRafoth, Bennett A.; Rubin, Donald L. – Written Communication, 1984
Concludes that mechanics had a greater influence on raters' judgments of student writing than either content or rating instructions. Findings suggest that evaluators may not be able to focus on individual criteria of writing quality. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Needs, Grammar
Peer reviewedKocher, A. Thel – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1984
The writing assessment program in the Cherry Creek, Colorado, schools is described. Writing assessments for students in grades three, six, eight, and 10 have been developed. A holistic approach is used by teachers in scoring these instruments. Improvement of students' essay-writing ability indicates the value of the assessment program. (DWH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Essay Tests, Holistic Evaluation, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewedDeShields, Shirley M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
The Standardized Test of Essential Writing Skills (STEWS) has been developed as a valid and reliable means of assessing expository writing skill. Studies concerning the reliability and validity of the STEWS are presented and their implications for use of the STEWS are discussed. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Expository Writing, Higher Education, Scoring, Standardized Tests
National Assessment Governing Board, 2006
The first section of this report contains the "Writing Framework for the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress" (NAEP) as adopted by the National Assessment Governing Board. This framework describes the basis for the writing assessment, the types of writing assessed, and the methods for scoring student responses. This second section of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Achievement, Writing Tests, Audiences


