Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 188 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1067 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2889 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6174 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 480 |
| Practitioners | 358 |
| Researchers | 152 |
| Administrators | 122 |
| Policymakers | 51 |
| Students | 44 |
| Parents | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Community | 15 |
| Media Staff | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Australia | 183 |
| Turkey | 157 |
| California | 133 |
| Canada | 124 |
| New York | 118 |
| United States | 112 |
| Florida | 107 |
| China | 103 |
| Texas | 72 |
| United Kingdom | 72 |
| Japan | 70 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 11 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Peer reviewedBrucia, James – American Biology Teacher, 1972
Descriptors: Biology, Multiple Choice Tests, Secondary School Science, Test Scoring Machines
Castello, Hugo – Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1972
Descriptors: Athletic Equipment, Athletics, Fencing (Sport), Games
Peer reviewedKelley, Paul R.; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1971
Descriptors: Anesthesiology, Certification, Examiners, Failure
Peer reviewedYens, David P. – Journal of Educational Research, 1971
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Schufletowski, Frank W.; Reed, Robert L. – J Soc Psychol, 1970
The importance of an item in an attitude scale is concluded to be a necessary but not a sufficient condition for item selection. No item offers much predictive value on that measurement continuum unless it is a relevant criterion in the value structure of the sample. (DB)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Measurement Techniques, Motivation, Predictive Measurement
Peer reviewedVondracek, Sarah I.; Vondracek, Fred W. – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1971
An attempt was made to develop a reliable measure of preadolescents' willingness to share information about themselves (self-disclosure). The completed instrument was used to study the effects of interviewer sex, subject's sex, and interviewer disclosure input on disclosure output in this age group. (Author/NH)
Descriptors: Grade 6, Interviews, Rating Scales, Scoring Formulas
Arnold, J. C. – J Exp Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Guessing (Tests), Mathematical Models, Methods
Rosecrans, C. J.; Schaffer, Harriet B. – J Clin Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Institutionalized Persons, Neurological Impairments, Patients, Psychological Testing
Edwards, Allen L. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Correlation, Item Analysis, Personality Assessment, Personality Measures
Peer reviewedHaller, Otto; Edgington, Eugene S. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Rod-and-frame test data of undergraduates were subjected to pattern analysis, which showed that most tilt toward the spatial position of the frame, while some utilize two frame cues, i.e., the nearest to vertical side and corner of the frame. Other interpretations of performance were not supported by results. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Style, Higher Education, Scoring
Peer reviewedNussbaum, Albert – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
In response to Webb and Shavelson (EJ 241 567), Nussbaum questions the relevance of the universe score variance as a meaning reliability index and whether it is useful to determine the weights which enter into a composite by means of maximum generalizability. (CM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Tests, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedWebb, Noreen M.; Shavelson, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Answering Nussbaum's (TM 507 069) criticism, the generalizability coefficient for absolute decisions, the use of the error variance formula, composites of maximum generalizability, and covariance components are discussed as yardsticks of measurement precision with arguments for the use of each procedure to interpret data. (CM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Tests, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedGreen, J. R.; And Others – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
A simple unbalanced block model is proposed for examination marks, as an improvement on the usual implicit model. The new model is applied to some real data and is found, by the usual normal linear theory F test, to give a highly significant improvement. Some alternative models are also considered. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Achievement Tests, Models, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedVance, Hubert Booney; Singer, Marc G. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
A study involving 98 children (6 to 13 years old) in ten learning disabilities (LD) classes investigated the hypothesized pattern of recategorized WISC-R (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised) subtest scores into spatial, conceptual, and sequential areas. (SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedHamdan, M. A. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
The distribution theory underlying corrections for guessing is analyzed, and the probability distributions of the random variables are derived. The correction in grade, based on random guessing of unknown answers, is compared with corrections based on educated guessing. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability


