Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 170 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1011 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2882 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6354 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 506 |
| Practitioners | 317 |
| Researchers | 186 |
| Administrators | 167 |
| Policymakers | 92 |
| Media Staff | 21 |
| Students | 19 |
| Community | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Counselors | 5 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 260 |
| Australia | 249 |
| Canada | 222 |
| California | 174 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 150 |
| Texas | 103 |
| China | 100 |
| United States | 97 |
| New Zealand | 87 |
| Turkey | 84 |
| Netherlands | 83 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 8 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 15 |
| Does not meet standards | 8 |
Scriven, Michael
A model checklist conceptualizing the evaluation process is presented and discussed. It is quite general and is intended to apply to the evaluation of educational products, procedures and most outcomes. The Pathway Comparison Model consists of the following: (1) characterization--how generally or specifically to describe the "treatment"; (2)…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Educational Needs, Educational Objectives, Evaluation
Milwaukee Public Schools, WI. – 1972
Three types of evaluation used in program evaluation and the type of instrument or measure used are discussed. The three types of evaluation are: comparison group evaluation, analysis of learner outcome or product objectives, and process evaluation. Measurements employed are either direct or indirect. Most measurement in education is usually…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Guides
Collet, LeVerne S.; And Others – 1971
This project represents the first year of a proposed two-year program to develop FEHR-PRACTICUM (Formative Evaluation and Heuristic Research), a computerized game which simulates experience in a research evaluation assistantship or practicum. In the game teams of from two to five players are given the task of finding the "best" among several…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Decision Making, Educational Development, Educational Research
Briggs, Peter G. – 1972
Two new directions for strengthening the evaluation and research efforts of school districts are discussed. The first direction is in developing a methodology for clarifying and systematizing formative evaluations; the second is in improving the attitude survey capabilities of school districts. (DB)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Data Collection, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
Tosti, Donald T. – NSPI Journal, 1978
Advocates a new set of feedback principles: (1) providing feedback immediately is frequently less effective than later; (2) it is usually a poor idea to couple feedback with praise; and (3) holding people accountable for achieving objectives that they have set often decreases their performance quality. (VT)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Feedback, Formative Evaluation, Guidelines
Peer reviewedSherman, Thomas M. – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1977
Reports an experiment to find out if formative student feedback is effective in improving teaching. Results indicated that this was true when the feedback contained specific enough information regarding instructor classroom behavior. (VT)
Descriptors: Feedback, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education, Statistical Analysis
Today's Education, 1977
Findings from the ninth annual Gallup Poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools are exerpted. (JD)
Descriptors: Bus Transportation, Discipline Problems, Educational Quality, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedHammel, Heidi – Journal of Experiential Education, 1986
Tells leaders how to design debriefing and processing sessions that allow outdoor education participants to integrate learning and achieve closure to experiences by setting aside time to reflect; asking proper questions; planning appropriate reflective activities; assessing collective and individual needs of group; and balancing variety,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Experiential Learning, Formative Evaluation, Guidelines
Peer reviewedColmar, Susan – Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 1988
Discusses the growing use by educational psychologists and teachers of developmental and academic behavior checklists. Identifies the minimum criteria necessary for checklists and criticizes their use as many fail to meet these standards. Describes the limitations, misuse, and narrow focus of behavior checklists. (GEA)
Descriptors: Behavior, Check Lists, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHolliday, Adrian – System, 1988
Shows how observation of a second-language classroom activity can be used to assess student, teacher, and materials performance. The classroom activity involves the key skills taught in the course and mirrors the overall methodological approach of the course. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Course Content, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Duby, Aliza – Educational Technology, 1987
Defines self-formative evaluation as the formative evaluation of instructional materials conducted during the development of the product by its users or developers. Topics discussed include the results of a study that examined users' attitudes toward such evaluation, their ability to execute it, and the effects of training on that ability. (CLB)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Inservice Teacher Education, Instructional Development
Peer reviewedTeskey, Niall; And Others – Online Review, 1987
Reviews current systems designed to help end-users search online databases without the assistance of an intermediary and describes a prototype system which emulates the Deco (the text storage and retrieval system used by Unilever) interface on Dialog and Data-Star. Initial trials of the prototype system are reported. (15 references) (MES)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Computer System Design, Formative Evaluation, Man Machine Systems
Dick, Walter – Performance and Instruction, 1986
Addresses the four questions raised by Yelon about use of pretests with instruction--should I pretest; on what should I pretest; how should I pretest; how should I adjust to results--and answers them from the perspective of instructional designers conducting formative evaluations to improve quality of instruction under development. (MBR)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Instructional Design, Material Development, Motivation
Peer reviewedMiesing, Paul; Preble, John F. – Small Group Behavior, 1985
The effects of different group processes on team performance is examined using a formative evaluation. A taxonomy of six different decision-making and leadership styles is developed. Cohesion was found to be a significant factor in explaining high performance. (Author/BL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Unity
Peer reviewedCamp, William – CEFP Journal, 1985
In an attempt to correct for limitations in the Program Evaluation and Review Technique-Critical Path Method (PERT-CPM), the Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT) has been developed. This management tool allows for evaluation during the facilities' development process. Two figures and two references are provided. (DCS)
Descriptors: Critical Path Method, Educational Facilities Planning, Formative Evaluation, Management Systems


