Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 76 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 511 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1086 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2605 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 169 |
| Practitioners | 49 |
| Teachers | 32 |
| Administrators | 8 |
| Policymakers | 8 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 174 |
| Australia | 81 |
| Canada | 79 |
| China | 72 |
| United States | 56 |
| Taiwan | 44 |
| Germany | 43 |
| Japan | 41 |
| United Kingdom | 39 |
| Iran | 37 |
| Indonesia | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Hayes, Leola G. – Pointer, 1976
Outlined is a method for teaching reading through naming and reviewing the names of various foods. (SBH)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Food, General Education, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedMasters, Geofferey N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
High item discrimination can indicate a special kind of measurement disturbance via an item that gives high-ability persons a special advantage. The measurement disturbance is described, which occurs when an item is sensitive to individual differences on a second, undesired dimension that is correlated with the variable intended to be measured.…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Item Analysis, Test Bias, Test Wiseness
Peer reviewedHovanitz, Christine A.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Evaluated the hypothesis that a response set accounts for relationships between obvious or subtle statements and criteria by assessing the discriminant validity of two Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) scales subdivided on the obvious-subtle dimension. The full scales appear to possess more discriminant validity than their obvious…
Descriptors: College Students, Discriminant Analysis, Higher Education, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedMiller, Harold R.; Streiner, David L. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Examined the subjectivity of the Harris-Lingoes Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) content subscales by asking expert judges (N=13) to group items from appropriate clinical scales that represented similar content, attitudes or traits. Results showed nine replicated subscales were highly similar and nine were moderately similar to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Item Analysis, Personality Traits, Psychologists
Peer reviewedO'Grady, Kevin E. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Analyzed the intercorrelations among the 11 subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) in the nine age groups in the normative sample. Results suggested that the factor structure underlying the WAIS-R is complex and that a large proportion of WAIS-R performance can be explained by a general intellectual factor. (LLL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedKlosner, Naomi Certner; Gellman, Estelle Klittnick – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Study compared three item arrangements on a classroom test: arrangement by subject matter, arrangement by ascending order of difficulty, and arrangement by ascending order of difficulty within subject-matter subtests. (Authors/CB)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Item Analysis, Performance Factors, Tables (Data)
Peer reviewedWahlstom, M. W.; Hunka, S. M. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1972
An algorithm, based upon factor analytic theory, is presented to illustrate one solution to the problem of selecting items for a test. (Authors)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Criteria, Factor Analysis, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedBowers, John – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Item Analysis, Mathematical Applications
Peer reviewedAsher, James J. – Personnel Psychology, 1972
In comparison with other predictors as intelligence, aptitude, interest, and personality, biographical items had vastly superior validity. (Author)
Descriptors: Biographical Inventories, Item Analysis, Measurement Instruments, Predictive Measurement
Jones, Kenneth V. – Comp Educ Rev, 1970
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Analysis, Role Conflict, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewedGuttman, Louis – Psychometrika, 1971
Descriptors: Definitions, Item Analysis, Measurement, Multiple Regression Analysis
Marso, Ronald N. – J Educ Meas, 1970
It was found test item arrangement does not significantly influence test results. (CK)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Item Analysis, Test Construction, Test Results
Peer reviewedBertou, Patrick; Clasen, Robert E. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1971
Descriptors: Cross Cultural Studies, Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Spanish
Lachman, Roy; Mistler, Janet L. – J Exp Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Item Analysis, Learning Processes, Recall (Psychology)
Proger, Barton B.; And Others – J Educ Res, 1970
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Concept Teaching, Instructional Materials, Item Analysis
