NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)11
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 271 to 285 of 640 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McIntosh, Melinda – Microform Review, 1983
Cites sources of information concerning selection of microform reading equipment and provides step-by-step outline of selection process. Defining specific needs for which equipment is used, determining what equipment is being marketed, and examining and evaluating readers' design features in terms of practicability and aesthetics are discussed.…
Descriptors: Equipment Evaluation, Information Sources, Libraries, Library Equipment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gleaves, Edwin S.; Carterette, Robert T. – Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1982
Suggests the acquisition of microform serials as a solution to the problems of cost, space, personnel resources, rate of acquisition, and rate of consumption of shelving space associated with library acquisition and maintenance of serials. Cost benefits for a select number of microform serials are considered. Nine references are listed. (EJS)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Cost Effectiveness, Higher Education, Library Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burke, Pierre – Microform Review, 1982
Suggests that microfilm storage areas can be more efficiently utilized if the unfilled spaces on microfilm reels are consolidated through splicing with microfilm from successive reels. The splicing procedure costs and equipment requirements are briefly discussed. A 17-item reference list on micrographic splicing is attached. (Author/JL)
Descriptors: Librarians, Library Collections, Library Equipment, Library Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sheets, Janet; Masters, Deborah C. – RQ, 1981
Describes the Reference and Adult Services Division's Outstanding Reference Sources Committee procedures for preparation of the 1979 listing, discusses expansion to include nonbook sources, and provides a retrospective list of nonbook sources selected by the 1979-80 committee. Nonbook sources include microforms and databases. Six references are…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Databases, Library Material Selection, Library Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Niles, Ann – College and Research Libraries, 1981
Suggests that libraries abandon full cataloging in favor of indexing, using the information provided by micropublishers. While a national index to the contents of microforms would be best, an alternative for local libraries would be to create their own COM (computer output microfilm) index. Twenty references are included. (Author/RAA)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Classification, Computer Output Microfilm, Indexing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mikita, Elizabeth G. – Library Resources and Technical Services, 1981
Reviews the major problems in the bibliographic control of microforms, particularly monographs in microform. The shortcomings of current practices in the cataloging of microforms are identified, and suggestions are made for the improvement of bibliographic access to these materials. Twelve reference sources are cited. (JL)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Books, Cataloging, Library Catalogs
Dwyer, James H. – Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 1980
Reviews results of microform user studies to reveal which computer output microfilm (COM) products are accepted and which ones are not. Impediments to use are discussed, and a list of further readings on COM is included. (SW)
Descriptors: Computer Output Microfilm, Information Utilization, Library Catalogs, Library Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hernon, Peter – Microform Review, 1980
Discusses collection development for government publications and encourages many libraries to acquire and retain only the more frequently needed source material. (Author)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Depository Libraries, Government Publications, Library Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cline, Nancy M. – Microform Review, 1979
Document librarians and the Government Printing Office (GPO) micropublishing program may well prove to be responsible for raising microforms up from their low status in libraries. Librarians must continue the dialogue with micropublishers, equipment manufacturers, government agencies, the GPO, and library users. (Author/CMV)
Descriptors: Depository Libraries, Federal Government, Government Publications, Information Dissemination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, William; Rockwood, D. Stephen – College and Research Libraries, 1979
Contends that the college library is primarily an illustrative collection of materials designed to support undergraduate teaching and suggests advisable directions for college collection development in light of this concept. (Author)
Descriptors: College Libraries, Library Acquisition, Library Collections, Literature Reviews
Bourke, Thomas A. – Library Journal, 1989
Explores the meanings that have been attached to the term "archival" and concludes that librarians participating in the national preservation effort use this term to mean permanent. Permanence is practically defined as storage for upwards of 100 years. Given this definition, the merits of microforms and optical disks as archival storage materials…
Descriptors: Archives, Cost Effectiveness, Definitions, Library Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Flores, Bess – Microform Review, 1989
Describes the development and current status of the Pacific Manuscripts Bureau, which was established to set up a South Pacific microfilming service and to collect and distribute manuscripts, other unpublished materials, published items, and oral material of value related to the Pacific Islands. (31 references) (CLB)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Cataloging, Clearinghouses, Cultural Background
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yerburgh, Mark R. – Microform Review, 1989
Discusses the importance of microform reviews as a tool for library collection development and offers advice to microform reviewers. A formula for microform evaluation is presented which covers intellectual content, institutional need, price, bibliographic control, and technical quality and format. (five references) (CLB)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Library Collection Development, Microforms, Nonprint Media
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tinsley, Bradford E.; And Others – Journal of Geography, 1988
Recommends the use of microfiche readers to enlarge imagery transparencies for mapping or tracing of images. The reader permits close viewing so the apparent resolution of the enlarged image is superior to that obtained with overhead or slide projectors. Additionally, the reader is compact and easily used at individual work stations. (LS)
Descriptors: Cartography, Educational Equipment, Educational Technology, Geography
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moran, Gerard T. – Microform Review, 1995
Discusses the project undertaken by MMF Publications to micropublish a collection of rare Dutch maps and drawings. Background information about the collection is given and decisions regarding the choice of microfiche format are explained. MMF elected to publish a printed guide to accompany the collection for enhanced access. (Author/JKP)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Archives, Atlases, Cartography
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  ...  |  43